Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Intelligent Design Added to Primary School in Britain

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Creationism gains foothold in schools

THE government has cleared the way for a form of creationism to be taught in Britain’s schools as part of the religious syllabus.

Lord Adonis, an education minister, is to issue guidelines within two months for the teaching of “intelligent design” (ID), a theory being promoted by the religious right in America.

Until now the government has not approved the teaching of the controversial theory, which contradicts Darwinian evolutionary theory, the basis of modern biology.

1/1/07 Update: Additional information from Truth in Science

As a side note, the famous Keele/Reading atheist philosopher Professor Antony Flew, who last year sparked a huge controversy by giving up atheism for deism, a move that was fitfully argued as untrue by the alarmed atheist movement, is one of the eggheads who encouraged the British government to start teaching ID.

It has emerged that 12 prominent academics wrote to Tony Blair and Alan Johnson, the education secretary, last month arguing that ID should be taught as part of science on the national curriculum.

They included Antony Flew, formerly professor of philosophy at Reading University; Terry Hamblin, professor of immunohaemotology at Southampton University; and John Walton, professor of chemistry at St Andrews University. In October Truth in Science was criticised for sending education packs to hundreds of schools across Britain explaining ID.

The packs — which included books and DVDs — were used by some unwary science teachers as teaching aids.

But Truth in Science in turn accuses Dawkins of pressuring ministers into promoting atheism through schools.

McIntosh said: “People like Dawkins are pushing atheism through schools, which is a religious view, and not a scientific one. Atheism is not the natural state of a scientist, since there have been scientists who have been theists both before and after Darwin.”

Lord Pearson, a Tory peer and supporter of ID, who asked the question that prompted Adonis’s statement, said: “Advances in DNA science show that the DNA molecule is so complicated that it could not have happened by accident. It shows there is a design behind it.”

Quick, call Judge John Jones and let him know. Obviously the Brits haven’t heard of his majesty’s ruling in Kitzmiller v. Dover and how ID died as a result. ROFLMAO

Comments
By the way- didn’t a well known scientist come out recently to knock down the idea that Darwinian Evolution is the basis of modern biology?
Not just one, but several. The whole biological community tacitly admits this when the Reporters cameras are off. See: In science’s pecking order, evolutionary biology lurks somewhere near the bottom Salscordova
December 31, 2006
December
12
Dec
31
31
2006
01:38 PM
1
01
38
PM
PDT
By the way- didn't a well known scientist come out recently to knock down the idea that Darwinian Evolution is the basis of modern biology? The claim that NDE is the basis of modern biology is fairly ridiculous on the surface. Would biology be put in a stand still if we were to get rid of the idea that blind, uncaring, undirected, accidental forces shaped all of biology? I seriously doubt the world would come crashing to a stop as some seem to almost claim.JasonTheGreek
December 31, 2006
December
12
Dec
31
31
2006
01:33 PM
1
01
33
PM
PDT
You have to wonder his journalism has gotten so dishonest and full of blatant biases. ID is "creationism" and simply an idea promoted by the religious right in America. Ummm, but Flew (a deist for famous former atheist) is supporting it in the UK. So Flew is part of the religious right in America, huh? Crazy how these extra dimensions work...that Flew could be a deist over the pond yet also in the US as part of the religious right! Needless to say- the top story above is commentary full of distortion not news reporting. The fact that the statements are so patently false is troublesome. You think a writer would realize some in his audience aren't complete fools, right?JasonTheGreek
December 31, 2006
December
12
Dec
31
31
2006
01:30 PM
1
01
30
PM
PDT
For what it's worth I have quote from Richard Dawkins:
I really have less trouble than some of my colleagues with so-called creation science being taught in the public schools as long as evolution is taught as well. By all means let creation science be taught in the schools Richard Dawkins Alabama Insert
scordova
December 31, 2006
December
12
Dec
31
31
2006
01:28 PM
1
01
28
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply