Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Media “reasonably fair and factual” in the David Coppedge case v JPL

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

That guy who was fired for offering ID vids to fellow employees. Or something.

David Klinghoffer says, re Coppedge (Evolution News & Views, March 13, 2012)

It’s tempting to say he has already won, before opening statements even begin this morning at the Stanley Mosk Courthouse in Los Angeles. There has been tremendous international media attention to this story, reasonably fair and factual. The headlines alone say it all: “Suit: NASA specialist axed over intelligent design” (that’s Yahoo). I’m very concerned about being able to get a seat in the courtroom!

In the courtroom yesterday I had the opportunity to meet him for the first time. The idea that this sweet and very soft-spoken guy was going around “bothering” people on the job is absurd, and one can only assume that Judge Hiroshige will perceive this clearly when Coppedge takes the stand. (It’s a bench trial rather than a jury trial.) You can see and hear the pain that David Coppedge has suffered because of the way he has been bullied and shut down and punished by his former employer, simply for not keeping silent about his scientific views.

The two factors may be related, of course. Media people who couldn’t imagine doubting for second that, given enough time alone, an amoeba can become a man do know one thing for sure: What a workplace is like if the boss seems out to get you. Stuff you are doing that nobody considered a problem suddenly becomes a big problem. Maybe it’s the slogan on your coffee mug (which your aunt gave you at Christmas). Or the photos of family or friends in your office. Or the vid you lent someone who had shown some interest in something you said …. oh wait, that was what happened in this case, wasn’t it?

After a while, everything becomes about the boss’s opinion and his opinion is not actually about job performance but a reflection of his own issues in life. And the bigger the organization, the more easily a boss can make everything about his own opinion and not about job performance.

Then he just has to wait for the employee to make some minor mistake and blow it out of proportion. Or put him on the list when a downsizing occurs.

Media people do know about that kind of boss, yes they do. And if that’s what they think is going on, it’s not surprising if they show Coppedge some sympathy.

Comments
Thanks for the link.jstanley01
March 14, 2012
March
03
Mar
14
14
2012
09:49 PM
9
09
49
PM
PDT
Perhaps while you are eating your popcorn, you can read JPL's response to the suit. http://ncse.com/webfm_send/1746alicejohn
March 13, 2012
March
03
Mar
13
13
2012
07:28 PM
7
07
28
PM
PDT
It's hard not to notice how kairofocus's recent post on "blood libel" exposes the roots of this kind of "blood sport" against people's livelihoods at places like JPL. Which isn't a grade school or a college, with "innocent minds" to protect, it's a real-world "scientific" enterprise. I'd be interested in reading the outraged comments by those who fancy that they post in support of the ToE here at UD objectively and in good faith. Or their comments in favor of JPL's actions, for that matter. Of course, who knows? Maybe their moral reasonings are as dense and inert as their objections to ID usually turn out to be, and they do well to keep their traps shut. Or maybe they've "gotten the message" about lengths that the Dispensers of Admnistratium at their own jobs and/or educational venues might be capable of, and likewise do themselves well -- as, let's get honest, mere underlings and sycophants -- to remain mum. After all, it's one thing to brave the heretics' benighted halls as a light-bearing champion of orthodoxy. Quite another to, in any way shape or form, side with them. Right boys and girls? Of course, this being the sole thread I've read here on the David Coppedge matter, maybe they have spoken up elsewhere on it. Or maybe they're simply waiting for what the judge ends up ruling... I guess I'll enjoy some popcorn till then too... *chomp* *chomp*jstanley01
March 13, 2012
March
03
Mar
13
13
2012
03:24 PM
3
03
24
PM
PDT
Yet Obama wants NASA to be welcoming and tolerant of Muslims and is willing to commit NASA money and resources to that end: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/09/nasa-chief-revealed-muslim-outreach-plan-al-jazeera-congress/ It looks to me the ID thing is just a proxy to make Christians feel unwelcome at NASA. No outreach to Chrisitans at NASA, persecution is the order of the day, and ID is a mere proxy for the persecution.scordova
March 13, 2012
March
03
Mar
13
13
2012
08:03 AM
8
08
03
AM
PDT

Leave a Reply