Human evolution Intelligent Design News

Missing link fossil a “hotchpotch,” “may never have existed”

Spread the love
File:Australopithecus sediba MH1 (ausgestellt in Maropeng).JPG
Sediba at Maropeng/phiston

So pulled from rewrite team for human evolution.

From “Human ‘missing link’ fossils may be jumble of species,” New Scientist:

ONE of our closest long-lost relatives may never have existed. The fossils of Australopithecus sediba, which promised to rewrite the story of human evolution, may actually be the remains of two species jumbled together.

The first fossils of A. sediba were found at Malapa, South Africa, in 2008. At 2 million years old, they show a mix of features, some similar to the ape-like australopithecines, others more like our genus, Homo. To its discoverers, this hotchpotch means A. sediba was becoming human, and that the Homo genus first evolved in South Africa, not east Africa as is generally thought.

But a new analysis suggests A. sediba didn’t exist. “I think there are two different hominin genera represented at Malapa,” says Ella Been at Tel Aviv University in Israel. One is an Australopithecus and one an early Homo. We can’t yet tell if the australopithecine remains are distinct enough to call them a new species, Been says. More.

All these chopping and changing stories have a central theme: Humans evolved randomly over a long period of time from a shrew-like creature into our current state. The evidence for that is always falling apart and is always dutifully reconstructed.

Watch for my upcoming Science Fictions series on human evolution at Evolution News & Views (it will be linked here at Uncommon Descent). – O’Leary for News

From a friend: While we are at it, “let’s clear out Homo habilis too.” Probably because “Skull 1470 has long been notorious for its ability to assume different shapes depending on how it is reconstructed.” See also: Contemplating Bill Nye’s 51 skull slide

Sediba two years ago:

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Note: Sometimes it feels surreal that some people lose their faith over stories about human evolution. They can’t be reading the real stories. The real stories sound more like this one. What people should be losing their faith in is pop culture’s current certainties and its general outlook.

6 Replies to “Missing link fossil a “hotchpotch,” “may never have existed”

  1. 1
    JWTruthInLove says:

    ^ It’s more like “changing their faith”.

  2. 2
    Dionisio says:

    Note: Sometimes it feels surreal that some people lose their faith over stories about human evolution. They can’t be reading the real stories. The real stories sound more like this one. What people should be losing their faith in is pop culture’s current certainties and its general outlook.

    “Do not despise prophecies, but test everything; hold fast what is good. Abstain from every form of evil”
    [1 Thessalonians 5:20-22 (ESV)]

  3. 3
    humbled says:

    Another evolutionary myth squashed…how many does that make now?

  4. 4
    jw777 says:

    Africa?

    I’m sorry. Is it the 1980s? Since then we learned that humans were in Spain at least as early as 1.3 mya and Georgia 2 mya. Categorically, there is not and cannot be a “missing link” from 2mya. It would have to date MUCH farther back.

    There is greater variation in contemporary Americans’ skulls and feet than the greatest difference between one “transitional” proto hominid and another. I’m sorry, folks. But we are never going to reconstruct common descent from fossils. It simply can’t be done without assuming the conclusion.

  5. 5
    Dionisio says:

    jw777 @ 4

    It simply can’t be done without assuming the conclusion.

    Agree. It seems like ‘a priori’ presuppositions become conclusions in line with their worldview. Hey, why not? Welcome to the world! 🙁

  6. 6
    OldArmy94 says:

    Completely unrelated, but I learned today that “hotchpotch” is a variation of “hodgepodge.” Carry on! 🙂

Leave a Reply