On the eye, the same argument proves a thing and its opposite
Evolution takes a “heads I win; tails you lose” stance.
As we all know from watching TV nature shows, millions of years of evolution lead to creatures that are perfectly adapted to their environments. They are equipped to fly, leap, sniff, mate, fight with systems remarkable for their novelty and reliability. That’s just what we would expect of evolution.
On the other hand…
When we read books and magazine articles (hardly ever does this appear in TV shows) we learn that evolution leads to many imperfect vestigial thinggies like the appendix, tonsils, backwards retinas, and junk DNA. These troublesome imperfections are remarkable for their poor design. That’s just what we would expect of evolution.
So Darwinists are in the position of telling us that not only does a certain argument prove evolution but it’s exact opposite also proves evolution equally well. My my. I wonder where logic went.
Follow UD News at Twitter!