Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

On false knowledge …

Categories
Intelligent Design
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Bruce S. Thornton of the Classics department at Fresno State University in California , author of Plagues of the Mind: The New Epidemic of False Knowledge (ISI Books, 1999), certainly spoke for me when he said,

What makes us recognizably human, then, is not what is natural about us but what is unnatural: reason and its projections in language, culture, ritual, and technology, self-awareness, conscious memory, imagination, and the higher emotions; and, most important, values, ethics, morals, and the freedom from nature’s determinism that allows us to choose, whether for good or ill. Nothing else in nature possesses any of these attributes, despite the wishful thinking of those who believe they are teaching chimps to “talk,” or who consider a monkey digging up termites with a stick to be “using tools,” or who label baboon rump-submission a “social practice,” or who subjectively interpret the behavior of animals to indicate the presence of “self-awareness” ore higher human emotions such as love, grief, regret, guilt, shame, or loyalty. For every dog that howls over the body of its dead master there is another that, if necessary, will happily eat his corpse.

Ah yes, … happily eat his corpse.

The meticulously tailored attendants at the funeral parlour down the street from my home are not, typically, told what to do when the bereaved open the coffin and start to …

In those few human civilizations when the bereaved serve the dear departed at the funeral feast, no mere animal hunger drives them. They want to absorb the merits of the departed. A misguided idea to be sure, but a distinctly human one.

Sadly, there is no easy path to virtue.

So what to make of the frantic project of the evolutionary psychologists who pretend that all these human qualities are regularly found among the creatures that squeak, howl, and shuffle in the night – warring over boiled-out soup bones in the dumpsters behind apartment buildings?

Just this: There is no going back on being human. You can be a good or a bad human. You can be a stupid or a wise human. But there is no going back on being human.

Get over looking for advisors among lemurs and chimps. They cannot tell you anything you cannot learn from your own life experiences.

Comments
Humans differ from non-human creatures in physical form, for ours is in the likeness of the creator, and in the defining fact that humans have souls, while non-human creatures do not. Neanderthals, although they possessed intelligence comparable to ours, did not have souls, and so it was no sin for our ancestors to remove them and claim their territory. All non-human creatures are subject to man, and the primitive technologies of Neanderthals were not science, while all of their activities were beastial due to their earthly nature. They were of a different species than ours, and never produced any offspring with humans, who are the descendants of Adam and Eve. Adam's father was not substantially different from Adam physically, but Adam's father had no soul, for the first soul of man is Adam. The soul of a human being is responsible for the moral character of all the thoughts of his or her brain, and the blessings of the Holy Spirit come only to humans, for they are gifts of the Spirit. When a human soul is disobedient to God and turns from His knowledge to seek to supplant God's authority with the knowledge of this world, depraved and immoral behavior occurs and the disobedient person takes on the characteristics of a creature of this world, which is passing away. Art, science, and culture are the product of spiritual man, and even the sciences of Satan could not have been created by physical brains alone. Adam and Eve possessed a genetic diversity greater than that possessed by anyone who lives physically today, and subsequent mutations in our gene pool are limited in comparison to their genetic diversity.FatherJay
December 21, 2008
December
12
Dec
21
21
2008
10:41 PM
10
10
41
PM
PDT
Ms. O'Leary, That's the best post of yours I've read. Thanks, StuStuartHarris
December 21, 2008
December
12
Dec
21
21
2008
09:34 PM
9
09
34
PM
PDT
"Please give me a break. The entire Darwinian story is so stupid I can’t imagine how anyone with any intelligence or who has even given a cursory glance at the reality that surrounds them can take it seriously." Well stated. I did not start questioning Darwinism until I read "Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds" Vividvividbleau
December 21, 2008
December
12
Dec
21
21
2008
08:37 PM
8
08
37
PM
PDT
GilDodgen: Bien dit. Thanks. One has to wonder if the goal [of those who persistently and methodically try to find man in animal and animal in man] is not trying to urge the world 'forward' to, that unspeakable reprobate, P. Singer's ideas on sexuality. That other unspeakable reprobate - H. Hefner - stated many years ago that there is nothing wrong with bestiality. No level of baseness is surprising with these morons. You have to question the motives of these lame brained twits and I remain very suspicious. Indeed, I would not leave a dog alone near them let alone a child.Borne
December 21, 2008
December
12
Dec
21
21
2008
08:25 PM
8
08
25
PM
PDT
A couple of interesting things. No one yet has been able to define intelligence and to describe what it means to be uniquely human. I don't think anyone thinks we are not somehow unique but it is hard to pinpoint just what quality it is that makes it so. In a post a few weeks ago I referred to a Teaching Company course where the presenter addressed this question and the best he was able to do was that humans are unique in using previous knowledge and building upon it. In other words no other species uses accumulated knowledge and builds on it. Other species learn things and transmit this knowledge to other members but none except humans build upon previous knowledge. It seems to me there must be more than this but while we make super computers, write symphonies, fly to the moon etc, this is the best that he says scientists and philosophers have come up with. One related thing is that one of the hominid predecessors to homo sapiens used tools for a million years or more and never improved these tools during this time. So what quality of a human allows it to build to the super computer or symphony. An aside, I spent a couple weeks on a trip where Bruce Thornton was a lecturer. A very bright and nice guy and a conservative thinker about the modern world as well as an expert in the ancient world.jerry
December 21, 2008
December
12
Dec
21
21
2008
07:21 PM
7
07
21
PM
PDT
I continue to be fascinated by the obsession on the part of evolutionary psychologists and evolutionary theorists of all stripes to equate humans with the animal kingdom. It seems to me to be some kind of pathological obsession, when the evidence is that humans are not just "more of the same" from the animal kingdom (that is, only quantitatively different), but something entirely, qualitatively different. This point should be transparently obvious to anyone who is not blinded by the idiocy of Darwinian thinking. Within recorded and archaeological history humans have gone from the stone age to the information age. Chimps are still picking up ants with sticks. If the evo guys want to explore something really interesting, they should compare the complete intellectual and technological stasis of the animal kingdom with the exponential evolutionary growth of human knowledge. Oh, and by the way, please explain how, in such a short period of time (i.e., a few million years at most), the chimp brain was rewired by random accidents affecting the nucleotides in the DNA molecule to convert picking up ants with sticks to the design and manufacture of supercomputers, advanced mathematics, books on ethics, pianos, symphonies, and so much more. Please give me a break. The entire Darwinian story is so stupid I can't imagine how anyone with any intelligence or who has even given a cursory glance at the reality that surrounds them can take it seriously.GilDodgen
December 21, 2008
December
12
Dec
21
21
2008
06:22 PM
6
06
22
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply