Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

On the Origin of Religion

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Science 6 November 2009:
Vol. 326. no. 5954, pp. 784 – 787
DOI: 10.1126/science.326_784 

On the Origin of Religion          Elizabeth Culotta
“How and when did religion arise? In the 11th essay in Science’s series in honor of the Year of Darwin, Elizabeth Culotta explores the human propensity to believe in unseen deities. No consensus yet exists among scientists, but potential answers are emerging from both the archaeological record and studies of the mind itself. Some researchers, exploring religion’s effects in society, suggest that it may boost fitness by promoting cooperative behavior. And in the past 15 years, a growing number of researchers have followed Darwin’s lead and explored the hypothesis that religion springs naturally from the normal workings of the human mind. This new field, the cognitive science of religion, draws on psychology, anthropology, and neuroscience to understand the mental building blocks of religious thought.”

Yes, indeed, Darwinism springs from the normal workings of the human mind. Whoops. Wait a minute, that can’t be right ’cause Darwinism is what allows us to understand all the other false things which spring from the normal workings of the human mind. So, like Darwinism is true. It has to be true. So maybe it’s the one thing that doesn’t spring from the human mind. It comes from somewhere else, some higher plane. Oh shoot, there is no higher plane. Sorry I forgot. OK Darwinism springs from the normal workings of the human mind, but it happens to be the one normal working we can trust. That’s it! It’s different from all the other normal workings which are false. We know this is the one and only true working of the human mind because… Well, just because.

Comments
Daniel 9 (24-27) is a prediction/future fulfillment. One that could not be faked by later writers. Mung, Matthew Henry wrote in the 1700s and he was waiting on Israel to become a nation again. This has been a common Christian belief since early times. Just because some Christians don't believe it doesn't mean they are correct.ellijacket
November 7, 2009
November
11
Nov
7
07
2009
06:28 PM
6
06
28
PM
PDT
----Saint and Sinner: "Many of the prophetic verses listed in Josh McDowell’s book are good proofs, but many are not since the fulfillment formulae in the NT (esp. Matthew) are more complex than a simple past prediction/future fulfillment." Yes, and even some of those that are simple past prediction/future fulfillment would seem ambiguous to the outside observer. If we raise the bar and disallow both categories, however, we still have a few hundred to spare.StephenB
November 7, 2009
November
11
Nov
7
07
2009
05:57 PM
5
05
57
PM
PDT
The Precisely Fulfilled Prophecy Of Israel Becoming A Nation In 1948
Even Christians don't believe this, so why should atheists be bothered about whether they can "dodge" it?Mung
November 7, 2009
November
11
Nov
7
07
2009
05:51 PM
5
05
51
PM
PDT
---Mr. Nakashima: "if we accept the evo-psych agenda that all human universals have an evolutionary component, then it is necessary for evolution to try to explain the universal of religion." Yes, that makes sense.StephenB
November 7, 2009
November
11
Nov
7
07
2009
05:48 PM
5
05
48
PM
PDT
What we're going to get is the argument that "science doesn't represent the *normal* working of the human mind; it represents a more disciplined peer-reviewed, tested kind of thinking". And, in fact, many people do find it difficult to think in the scientific way (probably lack of training rather than lack of capability). But I don't think that will help, because, well, what tells us that "scientific" is the "right" way to think? Our minds. And if our minds are susceptible to believing bunkum, then what if science is just another kind of bunkum? More to the point, how would you tell that it isn't? Because it's peer reviewed? That only means that you can get several others who are recognized as experts to agree with you. Religions do that, too. And peer-reviewed bunkum is still bunkum.rewt66
November 7, 2009
November
11
Nov
7
07
2009
05:43 PM
5
05
43
PM
PDT
Mr StephenB, Thank you for the references. Turning to the subject of the OP. if we accept the evo-psych agenda that all human universals have an evolutionary component, then it is necessary for evolution to try to explain the universal of religion. Whether it is possible to do so today is another matter.Nakashima
November 7, 2009
November
11
Nov
7
07
2009
05:26 PM
5
05
26
PM
PDT
ellijacket and StephenB, Many of the prophetic verses listed in Josh McDowell's book are good proofs, but many are not since the fulfillment formulae in the NT (esp. Matthew) are more complex than a simple past prediction/future fulfillment.Saint and Sinner
November 7, 2009
November
11
Nov
7
07
2009
05:19 PM
5
05
19
PM
PDT
---Nakashima: "That number, 459, is so precise. Do you have a source for it? I can’t find one." Consult either "Evidence That Demands a Verdict," by Josh McDowell or "Life of Christ," by Fulton J. Sheen.StephenB
November 7, 2009
November
11
Nov
7
07
2009
04:17 PM
4
04
17
PM
PDT
Mr StephenB, That number, 459, is so precise. Do you have a source for it? I can't find one.Nakashima
November 7, 2009
November
11
Nov
7
07
2009
03:57 PM
3
03
57
PM
PDT
Daniel 9 is rock solid. Even if you accept the most liberal dating for it's being written the prophecy still takes place 200 years later and cannot be faked. 1948 is another. Also, Deuteronomy 28-32.ellijacket
November 7, 2009
November
11
Nov
7
07
2009
03:48 PM
3
03
48
PM
PDT
Here Is one prophecy that atheists can't dodge: The Precisely Fulfilled Prophecy Of Israel Becoming A Nation In 1948 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrQqhINYrc4bornagain77
November 7, 2009
November
11
Nov
7
07
2009
03:09 PM
3
03
09
PM
PDT
---ellijacket: "There is incredibly strong evidence for the validation of the OT prophecies concerning Christ. Several that could not be faked if the NT writers wanted to." Yes, indeed. In the Old Testament, there are 459 prophecies in all, including several which detail the time, place, and circumstances of Christs birth. Those three elements alone [leaving out the other 400+] defy the odds at a level that virtually rules out chance. Of course, when confronted with these facts [they lack the intellectual curiousity to discover it on their own], Darwinists respond by suggesting that the New Testament writers redacted Old Testament prophecies after the fact, as if such a thing could even be possible. Let us be compassionate toward Darwinists. A mind is a terrible thing to waste.StephenB
November 7, 2009
November
11
Nov
7
07
2009
03:00 PM
3
03
00
PM
PDT
Has anyone ever thought that I might believe what I believe because of validated prophecies? To start with, Daniel 9. There is incredibly strong evidence for the validation of the OT prophecies concerning Christ. Several that could not be faked if the NT writers wanted to. I'll take my totally trustworthy, randomly generated brain and go now....ellijacket
November 7, 2009
November
11
Nov
7
07
2009
02:29 PM
2
02
29
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply