Fine tuning Intelligent Design News Privileged planet

Our Moon formed in collision with embryo planet?

Spread the love
artist’s conception, Theia/NASA, JPL-CalTech

A new moon formation theory, from ScienceDaily:

The moon was formed from a violent, head-on collision between the early Earth and a ‘planetary embryo’ called Theia approximately 100 million years after the Earth formed, almost 4.5 billion years ago.

Scientists had already known about this high-speed crash, which occurred almost 4.5 billion years ago, but many thought the Earth collided with Theia (pronounced THAY-eh) at an angle of 45 degrees or more — a powerful side-swipe (simulated in this 2012 YouTube video). New evidence reported Jan. 29 in the journal Science substantially strengthens the case for a head-on assault.

File:Moon nearside LRO.jpg
near side Moon/NASA

The fact that oxygen in rocks on the Earth and our moon share chemical signatures was very telling, Young said. Had Earth and Theia collided in a glancing side blow, the vast majority of the moon would have been made mainly of Theia, and the Earth and moon should have different oxygen isotopes. A head-on collision, however, likely would have resulted in similar chemical composition of both Earth and the moon.

“Theia was thoroughly mixed into both the Earth and the moon, and evenly dispersed between them,” Young said. “This explains why we don’t see a different signature of Theia in the moon versus the Earth.”

Theia, which did not survive the collision (except that it now makes up large parts of Earth and the moon) was growing and probably would have become a planet if the crash had not occurred, Young said. Young and some other scientists believe the planet was approximately the same size as the Earth; others believe it was smaller, perhaps more similar in size to Mars. More.

There’s no question Earth’s relationship with the Moon is unusual; it is somewhat like a double planet system and, as Privileged Planet explains, the arrangement favours life.

See also: Origin of the moon still shrouded in mystery

What if the Moon disappeared?

More on Theia

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Here’s the abstract:

Earth and the Moon are shown here to have indistinguishable oxygen isotope ratios, with a difference in ?’17O of -1 ± 5 parts per million (2 standard error). On the basis of these data and our new planet formation simulations that include a realistic model for primordial oxygen isotopic reservoirs, our results favor vigorous mixing during the giant impact and therefore a high-energy, high-angular-momentum impact. The results indicate that the late veneer impactors had an average ?’17O within approximately 1 per mil of the terrestrial value, limiting possible sources for this late addition of mass to the Earth-Moon system. (paywall) – E. D. Young, I. E. Kohl, P. H. Warren, D. C. Rubie, S. A. Jacobson, A. Morbidelli. Oxygen isotopic evidence for vigorous mixing during the Moon-forming giant impact. Science, 2016; 351 (6272): 493 DOI: 10.1126/science.aad0525

4 Replies to “Our Moon formed in collision with embryo planet?

  1. 1
    Mung says:

    Didn’t Velikovsky say something similar?

  2. 2
    velikovskys says:

    Except for there not being a collision ,having nothing to do with the moon and occurring thousands not billions of years ago, similar.

  3. 3
    tjguy says:

    Wait? Another hypothesis on the moon?

    What that tells us is that the current hypotheses were really insufficient and couldn’t explain the data.

    Will this new idea be any better? It will last until the next new idea comes along. They talk about this “discovery” as if it is FACT.

    The moon was formed by a violent, head-on collision between the early Earth and a “planetary embryo” called Theia approximately 100 million years after the Earth formed, UCLA geochemists and colleagues report.

    I think referring to it as an hypothesis would be most accurate. This is simply one interpretation of the current data, but I don’t think it solves all the problems, so their excitement and hubris would seem just a bit premature to me.

    It will be interesting to see how long this new idea lasts and – never mind whether the models are realistic or not – whether the computer models can be tweaked enough to make it work.

  4. 4
    DillyGill says:

    And for those of us who are prepared to consider that the moon landings were fake so the moon rocks must be fake, this is an argument for that! At least we now know where they got the rocks from now!

    NASA the forked tongue liars.

Leave a Reply