Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Pope for sound stewardship

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Pope Benedict XVI has formally challenged governments to address the moral issue of placing humanity above the environment. He calls for political decisions to be based on sound science, not political agendas. His challenge to sound science over ideological pressures parallels issues in the origins debate. Note particularly the parallels between differing presuppositions versus consequences of Darwinism, Intelligent Design, and Creationism. The Pope’s message highlights the importance of sound science in following the truth wherever the data leads, versus political environmental movements with explicit or implicit agendas diverging from or running contrary to the data.
———————–

UPDATE: The Pope’s message advocates responsible stewardship based on prudent policies undistorted by ideological pressures. The post title was changed to reflect the Pope’s emphasis compared to the news article below.
See source: MESSAGE OF HIS HOLINESS POPE BENEDICT XVI FOR THE CELEBRATION OF THE WORLD DAY OF PEACE 1 JANUARY 2008.
See especially: The family, the human community and the environment, Sections 7, 8.

For the human family, this home is the earth, the environment that God the Creator has given us to inhabit with creativity and responsibility. We need to care for the environment: it has been entrusted to men and women to be protected and cultivated with responsible freedom, with the good of all as a constant guiding criterion. . . . Humanity today is rightly concerned about the ecological balance of tomorrow. It is important for assessments in this regard to be carried out prudently, in dialogue with experts and people of wisdom, uninhibited by ideological pressure to draw hasty conclusions, and above all with the aim of reaching agreement on a model of sustainable development capable of ensuring the well-being of all while respecting environmental balances. . . . One area where there is a particular need to intensify dialogue between nations is that of the stewardship of the earth’s energy resources. . . .

See full message.
———————–

The Pope condemns the climate change prophets of doom

By SIMON CALDWELL Last updated at 14:48pm on 12th December 2007
“Pope Benedict XVI has launched a surprise attack on climate change prophets of doom, warning them that any solutions to global warming must be based on firm evidence and not on dubious ideology.The leader of more than a billion Roman Catholics suggested that fears over man-made emissions melting the ice caps and causing a wave of unprecedented disasters were nothing more than scare-mongering.

The German-born Pontiff said that while some concerns may be valid it was vital that the international community based its policies on science rather than the dogma of the environmentalist movement.

His remarks will be made in his annual message for World Peace Day on January 1, but they were released as delegates from all over the world convened on the Indonesian holiday island of Bali for UN climate change talks.

The 80-year-old Pope said the world needed to care for the environment but not to the point where the welfare of animals and plants was given a greater priority than that of mankind. . . . ” See Full Article

Comments
From the Pope's statement: "Respecting the environment does not mean considering material or animal nature more important than man. Rather, it means not selfishly considering nature to be at the complete disposal of our own interests, for future generations also have the right to reap its benefits and to exhibit towards nature the same responsible freedom that we claim for ourselves. Nor must we overlook the poor, who are excluded in many cases from the goods of creation destined for all." Well put, and hard to disagree with. I am not a Catholic or a Christian, but as Shaner74 said, I'm really starting to like this Pope. The only problem I've got is the inherent contradiction. The head of an inherently theologically ideological Church urging an unbiased nonideological consideration of the matter: "....to be carried out prudently, in dialogue with experts and people of wisdom, uninhibited by ideological pressure to draw hasty conclusions..." Surely the theological pronouncements of doctrine issued by the many Popes constitute an ideology imposed on all good Catholics.magnan
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
07:30 PM
7
07
30
PM
PDT
Robo asks: "Does anybody really care what the Pope says?" Robo, I'm going to go out a limb here and suggest that perhaps, just maybe, a few of the world's one billion Catholics might care about what the Pope says. Just a guess.BarryA
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
06:59 PM
6
06
59
PM
PDT
PlatosPlaything/Zoe "As far as I understand it, there is scientific consensus that we have harmed the Earth, our Mother. What some misogynist in a funny hat has to say about it is of little interest." What has "consensus" got to do with science? Cannot evidence overthrow theories at any time, let alone scientific dogma? Please consider some of the important contrary evidence being published. e.g.: Skeptical scientists urge world to have the courage to do nothing at UN conference I did not know ID was seeking to worship "the Earth, our Mother". Could we not all learn from that "funny hat". With his years, study, and consultation, Benedict XVI speaks with wisdom worth reflecting on. Regarding "misogynist", frivolous ad hominem attacks are not welcome here, nor is wasting our time. See Charter of the Rights of the Family, 24 November 1983, Holy See.DLH
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
06:35 PM
6
06
35
PM
PDT
bornagain77 re #9 "If this is true that they passed 100% efficiency, this could be the ultimate “green” fuel." If only it were true. Unfortunately, the laws of thermodynamics still rule. Expensive fuel drives the turbines to generate electrical energy which powers the microwaves that heat the water to form the plasma that burns so beautifully. Very pretty and impressive. Sadly this appears a very expensive way to generate and burn fuel. Focus on the incredible abundance of solar energy we bask in. "More energy from the Sun falls on the Earth in one hour than is used by everyone in the world in one year. In one day, the Sun provides more energy than our current population would consume in 27 years. In fact, "The amount of solar radiation striking the earth over a three-day period is equivalent to the energy stored in all fossil energy sources." The key challenge no is to design cost effective solar fuels. Applying ID, what insights can understanding design in nature give to this challenge?DLH
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
06:19 PM
6
06
19
PM
PDT
Does anybody really care what the Pope says? I mean, comments like: "I may start going to church again" just don't make sense. Christianity is -- loosely speaking -- about following Jesus Christ, and part of His message and that of His contemporary followers was to meet together with other believers, irrespective of anyone's views on human induced climate change.Robo
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
06:17 PM
6
06
17
PM
PDT
Off Topic: Trans Siberian Christmas in Lights http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsPZ2b-S1sM Amazing Guitar - Christmas Canon http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7949904946459764238 Holiday Light Show to Trans Siberian part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRvzcs3gQYkbornagain77
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
05:49 PM
5
05
49
PM
PDT
"Again, I don’t see why this belongs on an intelligent design blog." I don't understand how this type of question can pop up again and again and again and...It's almost like there needs to be a disclaimer on the front page. Something like, "We here at UD are free to discuss topics we feel highlight or parallel the injustices being committed under the banner of 'science'"shaner74
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
05:38 PM
5
05
38
PM
PDT
Yeah I'm really starting to like this Pope! It's just so funny that the "Pope" is more in touch with science than the media.shaner74
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
05:33 PM
5
05
33
PM
PDT
Um, why is this of interest? As far as I understand it, there is scientific consensus that we have harmed the Earth, our Mother. What some misogynist in a funny hat has to say about it is of little interest. I'm a committed design theorist, but I don't much care for Christians. However, at least the (largely Protestant) ones here are honest about their beliefs. Everything interesting in Catholicism (the worship of Mary, for instance) they stole from us pagans. Again, I don't see why this belongs on an intelligent design blog. Zoe.PlatosPlaything
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
05:29 PM
5
05
29
PM
PDT
The global warming thing is a damn lie. Its not a scam. It's a lie. If this pope continues they way hes going I just might start going to church again. Why do you think they called it "Greeland" becuase it use to be warm. Climate change is real but human cause climate change is not. If people realy cared about climate change and its impact on people they would be tlaking about global cooling just as much as global warming becasue the earth goes through natual ice ages and warming periods and we need to PREPARE for the climate change which is enevitible if we are to save money and lives. But nobody cares about the people they just want to take a shot at big business and/or make a buck- this is the sad nature of the human condition and the political climate is at its intellecual all time low IMOP. The earhts land mass is only 30% of the globe. Humans live on about 10% of that and human CO2 emmissions account for a startleing 1% of the earth's CO2 emmsions. Man made global warming- We are all going to die- What a big lie. Scientists are selling their souls to make a buck again - but what else is new?Frost122585
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
05:09 PM
5
05
09
PM
PDT
DLH ask: Or if there is evidence for Intelligent Design, could there actually be sufficient or even abundant energy to support such population growth? http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:John_Kanzius_Produces_Hydrogen_from_Salt_Water_Using_Radio_Waves#Oct._31.2C_2007 Fire from Salt Water of special note: John Kanzius has found a way to burn salt water with the same radio wave machine he is using to kill cancer cells. "While the phenomenon is interesting, it is not yet practical for energy generation as long as more energy is consumed by the radio frequency device than is produced for burning. Efficiency-wise, they started at around 76 percent of Faraday's theoretical limit...They subsequently quietly reported that they surpassed 100% efficiency, which would mean that the system is somehow harnessing environmental energy." If this is true that they passed 100% efficiency, this could be the ultimate "green" fuel.bornagain77
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
04:05 PM
4
04
05
PM
PDT
One would think this would at least make splash-page news, but the MSM sites don't even mention it. Perhaps it is because the Pope takes issue with Materialism's eschatological construct.toc
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
03:55 PM
3
03
55
PM
PDT
Mark Tooley opines on The Religious Left’s Meltdown on Global Warming
A growing world population cannot simultaneously reduce industrial emissions by 80 percent in 38 years without withholding modern material comforts from most of the Third World. Hundreds of millions in China, India, Africa and Latin America cannot aspire to refrigeration, air conditioning, reliable heating, or most electricity, much less automobiles, if reducing “carbon footprints” becomes humanity’s most important goal. In the mournful Malthusian minds of the European bishops, humanity must suffer in favor of preserving the sacred earth. They probably envision greedy Americans only having to abandon their SUV’S and mega-homes in favor of mass transmit and European style apartment dwellings. But the gargantuan reductions in industrialization for which the bishops plead will mostly punish those who have the least, not those who have the most, which includes the very un-self aware bishops themselves.
Are we condemned to Darwinian shackles of scarcity in a fight for survival in the modern jungle? Or if there is evidence for Intelligent Design, could there actually be sufficient or even abundant energy to support such population growth? Is there sufficient intelligence among humans today to design for cost effective sustainable energy?DLH
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
03:47 PM
3
03
47
PM
PDT
Slightly off topic: I thought this was interesting: http://acct.tamu.edu/smith/ethics/BP_rise_of_science.htm Christianity and the Rise of Science of special note: "Christian theology was necessary for the rise of science." Science only happened in areas whose worldview was shaped by Christianity, that is, Europe.bornagain77
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
03:09 PM
3
03
09
PM
PDT
-----bornagain77 writes, "He did not appeal to faith or any other “religiously motivated” reason. No he called attention to the fact that shabby science is being practiced in this matter! A funny turn of events indeed." Yes, Also, note that he is obviously open to intelligent design at some level. Just ask the anti-ID astromoner who recently got booted from the vatican.StephenB
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
01:06 PM
1
01
06
PM
PDT
Tobin Harshaw in News Flash: Pope Prefers People to Polar Bears raises questions over the thrust of the Pope's message vs the Daily Mail's article. It also linked to the Pope's message. With that heads up, I updated the lead post citing the Pope directly, linked to his message, and toned down the title. Rick Moran in Pope Benedict Calls Out Warming Fanatics provides a measured perspective to the situation:
Pope Benedict has taken an entirely different approach, calling out the fanatics who have substituted ideology for science in the search for answers on climate change . . .
DLH
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
12:49 PM
12
12
49
PM
PDT
Touchdown, Pope! He almost makes me want to be Catholic.Berceuse
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
12:05 PM
12
12
05
PM
PDT
The Pope stated: "that political decisions must be based on sound science, not political environmental movements." Isn't it funny that the Pope himself has called for the practice of sound science on this matter. He did not appeal to faith or any other "religiously motivated" reason. No he called attention to the fact that shabby science is being practiced in this matter! A funny turn of events indeed.bornagain77
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
11:54 AM
11
11
54
AM
PDT
A voice of reason - it's so refreshing. It will be interesting to see the reaction of the warm-mongers.Douglas Moran
December 12, 2007
December
12
Dec
12
12
2007
11:34 AM
11
11
34
AM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply