But they think so for the strangest reason: “Scientists found that only nine out of 8,700 planets could survive for as long as the Earth has”
Researchers at the University of Sourthhampton carried out mass simulations of climate evolution of 100,000 randomly generated planets.
Each planet was simulated 100 times with random climate-altering events occurring each time in order to see if habitable life could be sustained for three billion years like on Earth.
Of these planets, 9 per cent (8,700) were successful at least once but, of those, nearly all (about 8,000) were successful fewer than 50 times out of 100 and most (about 4,500) were successful fewer than 10 times out of 100.Adam Smith, “Life on Earth Didn’t Get Wiped out Because of ‘Luck’, Study Suggests ” at Independent
But why is that supposed to be luck? Earth appears organized to be highly adaptable. And that is not luck.
Darwinism makes people stupid and naturalism rots the brain.
See also: What becomes of science when the evidence does not matter?