Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Response to search engine query: What is the Colliding Universes blog about?

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

I was asked to define my littlest blog for a “deep” search engine group, Feedmil, and replied as follows:

Colliding Universes takes a critical look at cosmology, especially its many unexplained assumptions. Here’s one:

Earth is not special. There must be many planets that host life forms.

Now, what if we find 3000 exoplanets and none host life forms?

Does that suggest that Earth is special?

No, many cosmologists would say. We just haven’t looked hard enough. Find 3000 more.

It becomes obvious that their research is intended to confirm the “not special” view, and that – for both practical and philosophical reasons – it cannot be disconfirmed.

The practical reason is that they can always argue, “They’re out there somewhere.” The philosophical reason is that they are determined to believe what they want to believe.

That’s fine, but don’t call it science.

Incidentally, even if, after a search of 6000, two other planets were found that had life forms, we would know that there are three special planets, ours being one.

But don’t expect the pop science media to interpret it that way.

Also just up at Colliding Universes, my blog on competing theories of our universe:

Extraterrestrial life: Immanuel Kant, meet Frank Drake and Carl Sagan

Recession? Finally, big science gets the picture: Think payload

Conference: Quantum to Cosmos Festival

Time and space: Can we cure everything by advanced technology?

Comments
Graham: In this context, "special" just means we aren't here by random chance. Denyse rightly points out the philosophical underpinnings of those that fervently wish to avoid any indication that life or the universe is special. It just doesn't fit their paradigms. UrbanMysticDee: If the ability for abstract thought can arise through random chance mechanisms/events alone throughout our galaxy and the universe, I wouldn't see it as special in the context of this discussion. Indeed, if it were that common, it would be, well, common - not special. Given that I don't think sufficient evidence exists to support your confidence in the arise of consciousness, abstract thought, etc. through materialistic forces (not to mention the lack of any evidence to support the arise of the simplest of DNA-based life forms through random chance), I have no idea where your confidence comes from. Sounds like you, too, suffer from a philosophical approach to this issue rather than a scientific one.mtreat
June 24, 2009
June
06
Jun
24
24
2009
08:48 AM
8
08
48
AM
PDT
Even if one percent of the stars in our galaxy had life of comparable intelligence as humans (which I do not doubt is the case) I would still say we are special for the simple reason that we are here contemplating specialness. Any species that can move beyond mere existence into the realm of abstract thought would be special in my view. We are able to imagine what the world was like before we were here (highly speculative) and what the world will be like should we be go extinct for whatever reason (much less speculative). We can also plan ahead and develop technologies to spread to other planets, should the initiative be taken. If that is not grounds for special status then some people are in denial of their own specialness, which in itself is another special quality.UrbanMysticDee
June 23, 2009
June
06
Jun
23
23
2009
10:11 PM
10
10
11
PM
PDT
Science can move towards specialness.lamarck
June 23, 2009
June
06
Jun
23
23
2009
03:57 PM
3
03
57
PM
PDT
So, is earth 'special' ? If so, whats special about it ?Graham
June 23, 2009
June
06
Jun
23
23
2009
03:36 PM
3
03
36
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply