Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Richard Lewontin in The New York Review of Books

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Richard Lewontin, in reviewing several books that celebrate Darwinism, writes

…There remains, nevertheless, a substantial population whose commitment to a fundamentalist Christian belief in divine creation of the earth and its inhabitants has driven them to political action. Having been convinced that the separation of church and state is here to stay, they have adopted a pseudo-scientific theory of intelligent design in which the designer is unspecified, and attempted to introduce it into the school curricula in the name of intellectual openness. The scientific community has the definite sense of being embattled and one of its responses is to use the two hundredth anniversary of the birth of its apostle of truth about the material basis of evolution and the 150th anniversary of the appearance of his gospel to carry on the struggle against obscurantism. Jerry Coyne’s Why Evolution Is True is intended as a weapon in that struggle…

Source: www.nybooks.com/articles/22694

Comments
"(seeing that it is supernatural)." And neither is this a requirement. Design is design, whether by supernatural or Little Green Men.selectedpete
May 13, 2009
May
05
May
13
13
2009
11:02 AM
11
11
02
AM
PDT
btw, the separation of church and state was initiated by the church, not liberal materialists as they might have some believeuoflcard
May 13, 2009
May
05
May
13
13
2009
10:55 AM
10
10
55
AM
PDT
pseudo-scientific theory of intelligent design in which the designer is unspecified
Why is this a requirement? That would be a completely unscientific statement, because there would be no way to naturally test or observe it (seeing that it is supernatural).uoflcard
May 13, 2009
May
05
May
13
13
2009
10:51 AM
10
10
51
AM
PDT
1 2 3

Leave a Reply