Intelligent Design Peer review

Seeing is believing? 35,000 science papers may have doctored images

Spread the love

From Alison McCook at Retraction Watch:

n a new preprint posted to bioRxiv, image sleuths scanned hundreds of papers published over a seven-year period in Molecular and Cellular Biology (MCB), published by the American Society for Microbiology (ASM). The researchers — Arturo Casadevall of Johns Hopkins University, Elisabeth Bik of uBiome, Ferric Fang of the University of Washington (also on the board of directors of our parent non-profit organization), Roger Davis of the University of Massachusetts (and former MCB editor), and Amy Kullas, ASM’s publication ethics manager — found 59 potentially problematic papers, of which five were retracted. Extrapolating from these findings and those of another paper that scanned duplication rates, the researchers propose that tens of thousands of papers might need to be purged from the literature. That 35,000 figure is double the amount of retractions we’ve tallied so far in our database, which goes back to the 1970s. We spoke with the authors about their findings — and how to prevent bad images from getting published in the first place. More.

Retraction Watch. One way to boost your uni’s ranking: Ask faculty to cite each other This is elsewhere called a citation ring.

See also: From Retraction Watch:

and

Study of causes of science skepticism sails right by the most obvious cause

Leave a Reply