Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Study documents the rise of authoritarianism in science

Categories
Culture
Intelligent Design
News
Science
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Darwin Day in America From the updated edition of John West’s Darwin Day in America (with Afterword),

Our culture is witnessing the rise of what could be called totalitarian science—science so totalistic in its outlook that its defenders claim the right to remake every sphere of human life, from public policy and education to ethics and religion. The evidence for the rise of this kind of scientific authoritarianism is not just anecdotal. A study published in 2010 confirmed that in recent years there has been a dramatic increase in what some have called the “authoritarian tone” of science, exemplified by the growing use in science journalism of phrases such as “science requires,” “science dictates,” and “science tells us we should.”

The study to which he refers is discussed here:

In the past, scientists were generally neutral on questions of what to do. Instead, they just told people what they found, such as “we have discovered that smoking vastly increases your risk of lung cancer” or “we have discovered that some people will have adverse health effects from consuming high levels of salt.” Or “we have found that obesity increases your risk of coronary heart disease.” Those were simply neutral observations that people could find empowering, useful, interesting, etc., but did not place demands on them. In fact, this kind of objectivity was the entire basis for trusting scientific claims.

But along the way, an assortment of publicity-seeking, and often socially activist, scientists stopped saying, “Here are our findings. Read it and believe.” Instead, activist scientists such as NASA’s James Hansen, heads of quasi-scientific governmental organizations such as the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, editors of major scientific journals, and heads of the various national scientific academies are more inclined to say, “Here are our findings, and those findings say that you must change your life in this way, that way, or the other way.”

News here has noticed the trend, and also the growing impatience with the traditional rules of science that constrain their fantasies.

See also: John West has updated Darwin Day in America (read free excerpt!)

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Comments
See, it's not science that has become authoritarian, it's the people - along with their values - behind the constant political push. Correct me if I am wrong, but scientist tend to be more left of center. If this is the case, they will inevitably do what leftist often do which is to get government involved. If you are so sure of the purity of your crusade, you will seldom allow any other opinion to get equal footing. So today, the latest crisis that Liberals are fighting to stop (Liberals always tend to have some new crisis) is climate change. I am not going to argue for or against it. I am simply don't have all the know-how. But, what I will say is that if this is the latest crisis, and Liberals always tend to need get government involved in some capacity to regulate the public sphere, than the blame ought to lie there and not science.HD
February 27, 2015
February
02
Feb
27
27
2015
02:00 PM
2
02
00
PM
PST
Axel: ‘Righteous’ means the state or condition of ‘righteousness’, of ‘being in the right’ (not an emotion), used adjectivally to qualify ‘the outraged sense of justice or morality’(the emotion), you cite . Note the word "sense" in the definition. It might be that you are unfamiliar with the species, but among humans, it is common when seeing a small human child being injured to have a feeling of empathy, and if the injury is being inflicted unnecessarily to experience a sense of 'righteous indignation', a sensation which often compels action. This doesn't require any particular philosophy or rationalization, but seems to be a characteristic of humans generally. It's similar to how they form attachments to one another. There's no rational basis for it. It's just one of their peculiar behaviors.Zachriel
February 27, 2015
February
02
Feb
27
27
2015
01:59 PM
1
01
59
PM
PST
Axel @13 That's it. You could have 'unjust indignation'. So, righteousness requires some kind of moral judgement.Silver Asiatic
February 27, 2015
February
02
Feb
27
27
2015
01:24 PM
1
01
24
PM
PST
I suspect that over 90% of scientific knowledge did not come from atheists but theists. The atheists are just latter day science usurpers with a religious agenda. Authoritarianism comes when one religious group (such as atheists) begins to promote the idea that science belongs to them and them alone. Their pompous reign is allowed to flourish for a while and they go into orgies of mutual adoration and butt kissing. Of course, as will all such groups in the past, they eventually run right smack into the brick wall of reality. A paradigm shift pops out of nowhere and hits them hard between the eyes with a two-by-four. That's when it finally dawns on them that they are really just a bunch of self-righteous, know-nothings. They never had a clue, just like everybody else.Mapou
February 27, 2015
February
02
Feb
27
27
2015
01:16 PM
1
01
16
PM
PST
righteous': arising from an outraged sense of justice or morality' No, Zac. Righteous is the adjective qualifying the emotion of 'indignation'. 'Righteous' means the state or condition of 'righteousness', of 'being in the right' (not an emotion), used adjectivally to qualify 'the outraged sense of justice or morality'(the emotion), you cite .Axel
February 27, 2015
February
02
Feb
27
27
2015
12:40 PM
12
12
40
PM
PST
@Diogenes:
Moreover, the ID movement is itself an attempt to hijack the authority of science in pursuit of a political, authoritarian goal. They’re down with authoritarianism as long as it’s Christian right wing authoritarianism.
That would be bad publicity, since most id supporters think of trinitarianism as a false religion.JWTruthInLove
February 27, 2015
February
02
Feb
27
27
2015
11:10 AM
11
11
10
AM
PST
Really Diogenes? There are many in the ID camp who are not Christians and there are many Christians that oppose ID. In my mother's tongue; Jy praat nou stront.Andre
February 27, 2015
February
02
Feb
27
27
2015
11:06 AM
11
11
06
AM
PST
O'Leary's tweet for this post falsely states "study documents rise of authoritarianism in science" but the study in question did no such thing. O'Leary and John West present no evidence to back up their accusations. As usual. Moreover, the ID movement is itself an attempt to hijack the authority of science in pursuit of a political, authoritarian goal. They're down with authoritarianism as long as it's Christian right wing authoritarianism.Diogenes
February 27, 2015
February
02
Feb
27
27
2015
10:53 AM
10
10
53
AM
PST
Silver Asiatic: Righteousness is not an emotion. righteous: arising from an outraged sense of justice or morality Silver Asiatic: But beyond that, there are no good or bad emotions, they just are what they are. p Well, not sure about you, but for humans, they have many emotions, some good, some bad. Generally, humans prefer what they call pleasure to pain.Zachriel
February 27, 2015
February
02
Feb
27
27
2015
08:52 AM
8
08
52
AM
PST
Z
If a materialist sees moralizing as, at base, an emotion ...righteousness ... then there’s no illogic about it.
I think the term I selected there does show the illogic. Righteousness is not an emotion. But beyond that, there are no good or bad emotions, they just are what they are.Silver Asiatic
February 27, 2015
February
02
Feb
27
27
2015
08:21 AM
8
08
21
AM
PST
Axel: Strums lips… If you see love, hate, attachment, awe, fondness, righteousness, commitment, as 'lip strumming', then sure.Zachriel
February 27, 2015
February
02
Feb
27
27
2015
08:12 AM
8
08
12
AM
PST
Strums lips...Axel
February 27, 2015
February
02
Feb
27
27
2015
07:58 AM
7
07
58
AM
PST
Axel: It amounts to no more than infantile burbling of a very young baby, being precluded by the (il)logic of their formal creed. If a materialist sees moralizing as, at base, an emotion (love, hate, righteousness, envy, etc.), then there's no illogic about it.Zachriel
February 27, 2015
February
02
Feb
27
27
2015
07:41 AM
7
07
41
AM
PST
Thank you Zack. I believe you are right: 'libertinism'; not that a conceptual discordance is not the essence of the point. 'Have no idea where you got that idea. Some, but certainly not all, materialists are moralizing prigs.' It amounts to no more than infantile burbling of a very young baby, being precluded by the (il)logic of their formal creed. The appropriate response of an adult would probably be to strum one's lips, and see if it elicits a beaming smile - and more animated burbling; perhaps a squeal, even.Axel
February 27, 2015
February
02
Feb
27
27
2015
07:32 AM
7
07
32
AM
PST
Axel: Authoritarian libertarianism. You WILL be promiscuous in every way. Authoritarian and libertarianism are antonyms. Perhaps you mean authoritarian libertinism. Axel: Materialism prohibits any consideration of any kind of moral restraint Have no idea where you got that idea. Some, but certainly not all, materialists are moralizing prigs.Zachriel
February 27, 2015
February
02
Feb
27
27
2015
06:42 AM
6
06
42
AM
PST
Authoritarian libertarianism. You WILL be promiscuous in every way. Materialism prohibits any consideration of any kind of moral restraint; the sole exception being the immorality of opposing its own nihilistic canon. Secularism is indeed, the most jealous of gods.Axel
February 27, 2015
February
02
Feb
27
27
2015
06:36 AM
6
06
36
AM
PST
News: science so totalistic in its outlook that its defenders claim the right to remake every sphere of human life, from public policy and education to ethics and religion Too late! Turns out that science has already remade every sphere of human life, from the time your alarm clock wakes you, to when you turn on the lights, to when you bathe yourself in artificially heated water, to the time you cloth yourself in machine-made garments, to when you check your social media, to when you press the synthetic pedal that makes your automobile go, to when you while yourself to sleep watching cat videos delivered through a wireless digital connection to your electronic tablet. Didn't require any authoritarianism either.Zachriel
February 27, 2015
February
02
Feb
27
27
2015
06:30 AM
6
06
30
AM
PST
1 2