Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

The Left as Christian Heresy

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

In this post I argued that liberal (meaning conservative) democracy is based on an attempt to infuse politics with Christian doctrine, especially the inherent dignity and equality of all men.  In this article Peter Burfeind suggests a parallel on the other side of the political divide.  He argues that progressivism is rooted in an ancient Christian heresy known as Gnosticism:

Gnosticism applied to politics is Leftism. The gnostic mind is cast in black and white absolutes. It says the world is inherently corrupt in every one of its systems and institutions, and the salvation it proposes is pure light and righteousness. Politically, the gnostic mind can only be revolutionary: a new humanity will arise with new thinking and lead history into a new age; the old will be utterly dismantled. Until then, the gnostic is melancholic about the systemically corrupt world he’s imprisoned in.

 

 

Comments
GG -- interesting points. When individuals put the responsibility for acting virtuously on the state and not themselves, then the state just ends up crushing everybody with laws and oppression.Silver Asiatic
February 1, 2017
February
02
Feb
1
01
2017
01:42 PM
1
01
42
PM
PDT
Leftist virtue allows Democrats in confirmation hearings are saying that Trump's nominees have "ethical issues" because they do not support the program of the left to force everyone to serve the "common" good. This is a practical example of how the belief in Christian virtues is used in service to the left when their idea of "ethics" doesn't meet the traditional meaning of the word as referring to personal virtue, especially honesty and self-dealing, but rather leftist virtue of supporting the state as the enforcer of a virtuous society.GaryGag
February 1, 2017
February
02
Feb
1
01
2017
12:38 PM
12
12
38
PM
PDT
This analysis is too narrow. Leftists are not exclusively or even principally Gnostics. More broadly, the left seeks Christian virtue in improving the conditions of the suffering (the hungry, thirsty, outcasts, naked, sick, imprisoned, etc.), but they seek to offload the personal responsibility of virtue to the state. This means virtue is no longer a personal concern, but a political one. This thinking goes back to the basis of communism sought to leverage a non-religious, impersonal Christian-like form of virtue as a justification for state power. The appeal of the Christian attitude toward the less fortunate was undeniable after comparing Christian societies to non-Christian ones. So they claimed that such a society could be created without the unnecessary baggage of God. After all, God in this world relies upon people to act as his hands. The result is a kind of moral superiority without moral action, since no personal good acts are required. All that is required is to support the state forcing other people to pay for the "common good" as defined by the virtuous, that is, the leftists. The idea that there might be a personal good, an individual good, that can only be identified by individuals working and serving those near them is rejected. There is only the collective good (as defined by the left) to which all individual desires must be subordinated.GaryGag
February 1, 2017
February
02
Feb
1
01
2017
12:08 PM
12
12
08
PM
PDT
1 2 3

Leave a Reply