See here. It seems to me that that a news organization’s reputation for veracity is its most critical asset, without which it is literally nothing. And it is not as if there isn’t an oversupply of pretty boys who can read the news. It’s as if they don’t care that they are throwing away what little credibility they had left. Can someone please help me make sense of this seemingly senseless decision?
16 Replies to “Why Does NBC News Continue to Employ a Known Liar?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Barry, I can possibly help, at least for a start.
In the age of the Internet, veracity matters much less for a news organization than it did before.
People who actually want to know what is going on can find out for themselves using the search engine while exercising good judgement.*
But many people, including most of the viewership in this case, do not want to know what is going on. They want a version of the world that suits them, flatters them even.
They don’t care if the guy is a liar as long as those are the lies they want to hear. In fact, they are likely to turn and snarl at anyone who insists on facts.
Look at all the news stories recently that turn on lies and frauds. How many news consumers really care much?
You and I do because we are trying to get a serious discussion going in an area dominated by lies, fraud, and popular foolishness (Darwinism). But, let’s face it, we are a minority.
The average high school science teacher is perfectly willing to get up on her hind legs and spout Darwinism, even if she knows or suspects it would not stand rigorous testing in terms of accounting for the history of life.
The union will back her, with help from the Darwin-in-the-schools lobby, and that is what matters.
* It was way more difficult in the 1970s, when one could arrive at the library in a snowstorm only to discover that it was closed due to bad weather conditions. Just to find out about the government of the Cayman Islands or something. Ring so sorry. Today, it is only a click away – provided that the site is not fraudulent.
So back then veracity was much more important than it is now. Now it is all style, catering to worldviews, etc.
The big worry now should be government and other interference with finding out the facts. See, for example, troll house news. It probably won’t just be the “other guys” doing it.
Does this help?
Barry,
What do you think of Bill O’Reilly?
Bill O’Reilly is more honest and has more integrity than any evolutionist.
Why do people keep voting known liars into office?
If, because of his known lies, no one watches his segment and ratings tank, they will can him. The only show worth watching on that channel is “Caught On Camera”- they better keep him off of that. 😉
“What do you think of Bill O’Reilly?” – I think he’s full of himself like Larry Moran. But, unlike Brian Williams, he’s up front with his stance on issues instead of pretending to be an objective reporter.
Is NBC thinking of replacing Brian Williams with Bill O’Reilly?
That would be awesome!
Barry, everyone is a liar, including you. I happen to like B.W. and I think his lie was a smallish infraction. Who are you going to nominate to be less of a liar? No such person. Including you and me. Grace is in order.
I heard that Brian Williams now claims he’s an African American.
Just kidding, but I bet it would fly.
-Q
@8
hahaha
To echo mike1962’s observation
I challenge any adult to try to make it through a week, shoot even one day, being 100% absolutely, and completely, honest.
It is a lot harder than it sounds.
Of related interest is Benjamin Franklin’s quest for moral perfection.
Verses, Quote, and Music:
Just sayin’
The inmates are running the asylum.
Here’s an interesting thought. What do you think motivated Brian Williams to lie?
Why would someone who makes $10 million a year feel the need? 10 million a year.
I’m just asking.
-Q
He probably came from a fairly monied background, and it sometimes happens – perhaps more often than among the poorer folk – that the children of such parents don’t get the parental love that the poorer folk tend to get. Toffs often feel closer to their nanny when they grow up than to their own mother.
I remember a TV programme where an orphan lad had done quite well in business, and eventually discovered his family. His mother had been forced to give him up for adoption or to an orphanage for one reason or another, as did happen several decades ago. They were a very warm, working-class family, and we saw him taking one of his brothers out on a motor-boat he owned.
The thing is, he would have given up all his affluence to have grown up in his family with his brothers and sisters. Anyway it was a happy ending. The point of course being that an affluent background doesn’t necessarily signify a healthy development and happiness.
I think what Williams did was wrong, it was a serious lapse of journalistic integrity, but let’s not get too self-righteous about it. To quote Dr Gregory House, “”It’s a basic truth of the human condition that everybody lies. The only variable is about what.”
News @ 1
Maybe in Canada, not so much in the US