Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

You’d rather watch this than passing trains …

arroba Email

A friend drew my attention to this video essay: “The animators of life”, New York Times (November 15, 2010):

Building on decades of research and mountains of data, scientists and animators are now recreating in vivid and sometimes jaw-dropping detail the complex inner machinery of living cells.

Essentially, the Darwinists’ problem isn’t with us. It is twofold: an ever-intensifying blizzard of disconfirming evidence from nature, plus the bad fortune to be working at a time when the Internet brings that information to people who are not inoculated against it. Essentially, time and chance do not create high levels of information through ruthless competition. Darwinism is a form of magic, and has the same success rate as the others.

Here’s a snippet on the new technical power for discovering the facts, courtesy Boing Boing:

A human hair is somewhere between 60,000 and 120,000 nanometers wide. The new microscope that took this image of a mouse cell can capture 3-D images at a resolution of 30 nanometers.

Other friends recently became immersed in a question of the best source of animations.

One favors this one from Mercola:

This animation was designed to take cellular biology students on a journey through the microscopic world of a cell. It illustrates the mechanisms that allow a white blood cell to sense its surroundings and respond to an external stimulus.

And here’s one that covers most of the major cell processes.

And here’s the oddest attack I’ve ever heard on the evidence that the animations show: They are animations, and the real thing looks fuzzier under a micrograph. But then this person sees no difference between animations of actual cell processes and Haeckel’s misleading embryo drawings, a scandal for over a century and still defended by Darwinists because, while misleading, they front Darwin’s cause to students in tax-supported, compulsory attendance schools. And what else matters?

It’s interesting to reflect that if ID folk had any reason to suspect that the new cell life animations really misled in any way, they would not want anything to do with them.

Please check this out - I think it deserves a separate article here: Scientists create computer-programmable bacteria http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/12/12/scientists-create-computer-programmable-bacteria/?hpt=C2 rprado
It takes a great deal more faith than I have to believe all this happened by a series of lucky accidents. camdenguy
The most amazing thing about these processes is that in real life they occur in total darkness... rprado
"Essentially, time and chance do not create ..." Neither time nor chance have any causal power. To speak of time having causal power is as odd as speaking of space having causal power. To speak of chance having causal powere it to speak of non-causes having causal power (this point -- and the seeming disinclination to understand it -- is one of my pet peeves with IDists). Ilion
Well if they don't like animations here is a,,, Bacterial Flagellum: Visualizing the Complete Machine In Situ Excerpt: Electron tomography of frozen-hydrated bacteria, combined with single particle averaging, has produced stunning images of the intact bacterial flagellum, revealing features of the rotor, stator and export apparatus. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VRT-4M8WTCF-K&_user=10&_coverDate=11%2F07%2F2006&_rdoc=1&_fmt=full&_orig=search&_cdi=6243&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=8d7e0ad266148c9d917cf0c2a9d12e82&artImgPref=F bornagain77

Leave a Reply