Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Anything I Remove Without Causing Immediate Catastrophe Must Be Junk

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

I was in the server room with my system administrator the other day, discussing how we could cut costs in the server room.

I told him that the budget for the server room was too big, and we needed to implement some cost-saving measures. He said that everything he bought was necessary. That is so like a system administrator – to overbuy and just pretend that it is necessary.

What I told him is this – if I can remove it and the servers still function, then it was a waste and we can at least resell the extra pieces.

So, I took a big bin with me and started walking around. The first thing I noticed was that every server was plugged into the wall twice into different circuits. Not only that, but the machines themselves had two power supplies. So I went to each machine and physically removed one of the power supplies and put it in the bin. The machines continued to run, so I was satisfied with what I had done. In fact, removing one power supply from each machine opened up an entire circuit path on each rack, so that was removed as well.

Then, I went to the an area labelled “backups”. There was a giant, expensive-looking machine that was moving tapes back-and-forth. There were numerous servers, each sucking up a huge amount of electricity. I asked the system administrator if this data existed anywhere else. “Yes,” he said. “Well, then we don’t need it.”

I unplugged all of the devices. I put all the servers in the bin. The tape library was too big for the bin, but I had some people remove it and take it to the curb.

Next, I noticed that the cables connecting everything were attached to various nodes. I asked the system administrator, “what do these things do?” “Cable management” he said. Cable management? “Do the wires carry the same amount of data without cable management?” “Yes.” “Then get rid of them.” So we removed all of the armatures and supports of the cabling.

Then, I got to a section that had an endless array of batteries. “What do these batteries power?” “Right now, nothing” said the system administrator. “So why did we buy them?” I said angrily as I threw them into the bin. I also noticed an unused generator in the corner. I told the men carrying out the tape machine to get the generator as well. “What is that, from the 1800s? We’ve been connected to the grid for years, and that generator is just sitting in the corner doing nothing. Get rid of it.”

Then I realized – I had been concentrating on the center of the room. There was all sorts of equipment on the outer walls of the room as well. “What are these big units? How much data do they process?” “They don’t process any data, sir” said the administrator. “They are air conditioners” he said. I responded, “the building is already air-conditioned! You don’t need special air conditioners just because you are well-paid.” So we removed the air conditioners.

“Is there anything else that can be removed?” I asked. “Well,” the administrator said nervously. “The hard drives are in a RAID configuration. That means that at least one hard drive from each machine can be removed.” So we went around and removed a hard drive from each machine.

Then there were a bunch of machines labelled “staging”. “What do these do?” I asked. “They are the machines that we use to test code before we release it.” “Get rid of them.” I said.

Then I noticed a lot of machines labelled “Secondary”. There was a “Secondary DNS” machine, a “secondary database” machine, and so forth. “Are these needed?” “Only if the main one goes down.” “So they just sit here and eat up electricity and bandwidth without doing anything?” Get rid of them.

I then called up to the operations center and had them test all of our systems to make sure they are all still online. “Yes, sir!” They said. “In fact, you are using significantly less electricity as well – sounds like you are doing a great job over there!”

So, pleased with my work, I told the system administrator – “see, I told you that we could cut this stuff down. We removed over half of the server room and it is still functional!”

(note – this post is a more satirized version of a comment I made on a previous post)

——————–end of story

I should also note that instead of removing the secondary DNS and secondary databases, we actually could have removed the primary DNS and the primary database without any immediate issue if the site was not under load. Additionally, if the hard drives were in a RAID5 configuration, removing a hard drive would actually increase performance.

In case you didn’t notice, the goal of this is to illustrate the idiocy of saying that the “functional fraction” of the genome is equivalent to the amount of the genome for which there are no detrimental effects to removing or to mutation. Under this criteria, all of the things that we removed from the server room would not be considered “functional”.

And yes, if the server is well built, you can remove active power supplies and hard drives from running servers without them even hiccuping.

Comments
Perhaps the comment posted @1030 in the thread titled “A third way of evolution?” in the following link relates to this OP? https://uncommondescent.com/evolution/a-third-way-of-evolution/#comment-612770Dionisio
July 15, 2017
July
07
Jul
15
15
2017
08:00 PM
8
08
00
PM
PDT
EricMH @ 9, Seversky is saying that stuff wears out, which wasn't really my point. Any agreement with Seversky on my part was purely accidental, coincidental, and unintended. :o)harry
July 15, 2017
July
07
Jul
15
15
2017
07:24 PM
7
07
24
PM
PDT
Seversky and harry make johnnyb's point. Without understanding the server room, we have no way of knowing what is functional or not merely by removing it and nothing crashing.EricMH
July 15, 2017
July
07
Jul
15
15
2017
06:20 PM
6
06
20
PM
PDT
If the criteria for junk is the ability to to remove anything without causing immediate catastrophic failure, then I guess we could all lose a few fingers and toes, a kidney, gallbladder, a lung, and who knows what else.....Kal
July 15, 2017
July
07
Jul
15
15
2017
05:21 PM
5
05
21
PM
PDT
Seversky @ 4: Your analogy breaks down at almost every point, as if you have no idea about how DNA works or how miserably a/mats failed when trying to use the junk DNA myth against design arguments. I don't hear many a/mats talking about junk DNA anymore, save for a few diehards (like yourself?) still clinging to the myth.Truth Will Set You Free
July 15, 2017
July
07
Jul
15
15
2017
03:49 PM
3
03
49
PM
PDT
johnnyb: I just posted on the original OP concerning Graur's assertion. You might be interested.PaV
July 15, 2017
July
07
Jul
15
15
2017
02:58 PM
2
02
58
PM
PDT
johnnyb, I like this. Thanks. Unfortunately some politely dissenting interlocutors won't understand the meaning of the story. Oh, well. What else is new?Dionisio
July 15, 2017
July
07
Jul
15
15
2017
02:33 PM
2
02
33
PM
PDT
Yupkairosfocus
July 15, 2017
July
07
Jul
15
15
2017
01:16 PM
1
01
16
PM
PDT
It's a nice little parable but there is one point missing. Nothing is perfect, things break down. So around the server room, tucked away in various odd spaces and in neighboring storage rooms. are piles of crashed hard drives, burnt-out monitors, broken keyboards and spent batteries, They take up a bit of space but they don't impede the operation of the servers in any way. they all have a function, it's just that they can no longer perform it. Maybe you could still get some fragments of information off the damaged drives if you hooked them up right or a splutter of power from the batteries. Would you say they are still functional or would you say they are junk?Seversky
July 15, 2017
July
07
Jul
15
15
2017
01:11 PM
1
01
11
PM
PDT
johnnyb,
(note – this post is a more satirized version of a comment I made on a previous post)
I am glad you added that, as, having spent most of my adult life working in IT, your story sounded far fetched. ;o) We are in a no better position to decide what is really functional and what isn't, what is necessary and what isn't, in the nanotechnology of life than jungle savages are to make such judgments about the functionality of a laptop PC. The technology is beyond us. We can't even design and build a small package that can be buried in the earth that will, using the resources in the ground, grow into something the size of, say, a small bush, and produce more packages like the one we started with. Why can't we do something like that? Because we are nowhere near understanding the nanotechnology of life. We have learned a lot. So would savages poking around with laptop PCs, but they would still have no idea how to build one from scratch. Nor do we have any idea how to build life from scratch. Just as it would be for the savages poking around with PCs, it is ridiculous for us to be making pronouncements about the functionality or necessity of the components of nanotechnology that is light years beyond our own.harry
July 15, 2017
July
07
Jul
15
15
2017
11:42 AM
11
11
42
AM
PDT
Excellent post, thank you.LocalMinimum
July 15, 2017
July
07
Jul
15
15
2017
09:47 AM
9
09
47
AM
PDT
It's not just the genome. I'm putting together courseware based on a Neurology book, and in the process I'm learning all sorts of stuff that wasn't known 10 years ago. The glial cells were considered to be padding until somebody looked closely. Now the glia are turning out to be a skilled and varied army of technicians taking care of the neurons. Just one example: Oligodendrocytes spend their time knitting myelin sleeves around axons. Most of their work is done in childhood, but they remain around in case the sleeves start to unravel. If you wiped them out, you'd guarantee MS.polistra
July 15, 2017
July
07
Jul
15
15
2017
08:35 AM
8
08
35
AM
PDT
1 2 3

Leave a Reply