Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Expelled Plagiarizing Harvard?

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Premise Media has just been slapped with a “cease and desist” letter from XVIVO, the group at Harvard that produced the video clips from which the still images at the top of this thread were taken. They are alleging copyright infringement (not to mention blatant plagiarism). The full text of the letter from XVIVO’s lawyers can be read at:

ERV: Expelled Epelled for Plagiarism
ERV: About That Cell Video in Expelled

The letter makes it clear that if the offending video clips are not removed from the film and all promotional materials by the opening date, immediate legal action will be taken to stop the release of the film.

Thanks to Allen MacNeill for bringing this accusation to our attention.

This accusation first became public when PZ Myers claimed that the Expelled movie used the Harvard “Inner Life of the Cell” animation. We’re currently investigating this claim and hopefully we’ll have more information in the next couple hours. But when asked about this, Jonathan Wells had this to say:

Expelled does NOT use the Harvard animation. The producers paid a professional to create a new animation that is more accurate than the Harvard one (based on current knowledge of cellular processes). Any similarities between the Expelled animation and the Harvard one are due to the fact that both animations depict many of the same processes.

Comments
"I think the point is that the truth seems to be a problem for Harvard — that is, the truth in the hands of the wrong people." No kidding...that animation is all over the internet and on youtube of all places. Harvard didn't seem the least bit concerned until an ID proponent showed it. Truth is, that when people really contemplate the inner life of a cell, you cannot miss the design....*that's what worries them*.FtK
April 10, 2008
April
04
Apr
10
10
2008
10:38 AM
10
10
38
AM
PDT
I wouldn't worry too much, having a university cull scientific research from the public -- because "they might get the wrong idea." Is absolutely priceless. The little people just can't handle the Mass in english, or the sacred texts in the vernacular. You couldn't purchase that kind of malignant hypocrisy for all the tea in China.wnelson
April 10, 2008
April
04
Apr
10
10
2008
10:35 AM
10
10
35
AM
PDT
They've got to come up with something to drag the Expelled producers to court over...might as well be the cell animation. They've tried a few other angles already...none have panned out for them. But, come on people, a cell's a cell...I mean if you're making a computer generated animation, I'd assume that you're going to see some similarities between them. It wouldn't matter if the animations were significantly different...if they were dragged to court, they’d most assuredly come up against some blazingly liberal judge just waiting to be showered with accolades from the "scientific community" and looking to dethrone JJ from his current reign as Mr. Intellectual (or rather Mr. Plagiarism himself). Never ever a dull moment folks..FtK
April 10, 2008
April
04
Apr
10
10
2008
10:33 AM
10
10
33
AM
PDT
With tickets already available online can the film actually be prevented from being released? Is it physically possible at this point to remove the clips? I hope there is some good news on this soon as it threatens to really ruin my day.13atman
April 10, 2008
April
04
Apr
10
10
2008
10:30 AM
10
10
30
AM
PDT
"I just cannot recall where I saw his comments. Does anyone else recall this???" Umm, perhaps on his blog where he posts all of his stuff? http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/03/about_that_cell_video_in_expel.php His original claim was that they actually USED the Harvard animation. Then after comparing them side-by-side, he decided that it wasn't actually the same video, it was just a shameless rip-off (which can be determined by the fact that they made the same mistakes as in the original Harvard video, chose to show AND HIDE the same structures and processes, and even used the same basic "camera" angles.)ykroz
April 10, 2008
April
04
Apr
10
10
2008
10:26 AM
10
10
26
AM
PDT
I'm sure it is basically reversed engineered animation. I believe Miller has admitted as much. If they didn't examine the copyright angle -- then they will have to die by the rules of the game. Which would be disappointing. I think the point is that the truth seems to be a problem for Harvard -- that is, the truth in the hands of the wrong people. The game is over -- the paradigm has shifted, we are just seeing a period of readjustment.wnelson
April 10, 2008
April
04
Apr
10
10
2008
10:20 AM
10
10
20
AM
PDT
I seem to recall that P-Zed noticed a similarity to the Harvard XVIVO animation in a post of his a month or two ago. In that post, he thought it WAS the XVIVO animation, but in another post, backed off those allegations and said the animation was similar but it wasn't the Harvard animation. I just cannot recall where I saw his comments. Does anyone else recall this???JJS P.Eng.
April 10, 2008
April
04
Apr
10
10
2008
10:16 AM
10
10
16
AM
PDT
A university coercing people with legal muscle from seeing the true of interworkings of a cell? Then they've already lost.wnelson
April 10, 2008
April
04
Apr
10
10
2008
10:13 AM
10
10
13
AM
PDT
Um, having watched the new video on the site, they either ARE using the Harvard animation OR they have created an exact replica. When I saw it, it was immediately recognizable as the Harvard animation.Gods iPod
April 10, 2008
April
04
Apr
10
10
2008
10:03 AM
10
10
03
AM
PDT
1 5 6 7

Leave a Reply