Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Someone is looking for the “free will” neuron. Otherwise …


Further to “So now free will is just background noise?”, from Technology Review:

Kreiman, 42, believes his work challenges important Western philosophical ideas about free will. The Argentine-born neuroscientist, an associate professor at Harvard Medical School, specializes in visual object recognition and memory formation, which draw partly on unconscious processes. He has a thick mop of black hair and a tendency to pause and think a long moment before reframing a question and replying to it expansively. At the wheel of his Jeep as we drove down Broadway in Cambridge, Massachusetts, Kreiman leaned over to adjust the MP3 player—toggling between Vivaldi, Lady Gaga, and Bach. As he did so, his left hand, the one on the steering wheel, slipped to let the Jeep drift a bit over the double yellow lines. Kreiman’s view is that his neurons made him do it, and they also made him correct his small error an instant later; in short, all actions are the result of neural computations and nothing more. “I am interested in a basic age-old question,” he says. “Are decisions really free? I have a somewhat extreme view of this—that there is nothing really free about free will. Ultimately, there are neurons that obey the laws of physics and mathematics. It’s fine if you say ‘I decided’—that’s the language we use. But there is no god in the machine—only neurons that are firing.”

But the firing of a neuron that guides us one way or another is ultimately like the toss of a coin, Kreiman insists. “The rules that govern our decisions are similar to the rules that govern whether a coin will land one way or the other. Ultimately there is physics; it is chaotic in both cases, but at the end of the day, nobody will argue the coin ‘wanted’ to land heads or tails. There is no real volition to the coin.”

Actually, there is no particularly good evidence for the absence of free will; only theories that do not accommodate it.

Question: What sorts of political systems are best suited to the belief that there is no free will?

See also: “‘I will’ means something after all


Guess what? A “genetic predisposition” to empathy has been discovered in the brain!

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Hat tip: Bioethics.com

I'm looking for the "free lunch" neuron. Mung
Automotive Engineers are designing state of the art Crash Avoidance Systems to compensate for sapiens lack of free will? Forget about the "ghost in the machine", focus on the "distracted professor behind the wheel". Thank you Automotive Safety Engineers. ppolish

Leave a Reply