Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Birds’ eyespot designs likely had independent origins

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

According to a new Royal Society paper by Keping Sun et al:

The most striking feature of peafowl (Pavo) is the males’ elaborate train, which exhibits ocelli (ornamental eyespots) that are under sexual selection. Two additional genera within the Phasianidae (Polyplectron and Argusianus) exhibit ocelli, but the appearance and location of these ornamental eyespots exhibit substantial variation among these genera, raising the question of whether ocelli are homologous. Within Polyplectron, ocelli are ancestral, suggesting ocelli may have evolved even earlier, prior to the divergence among genera. However, it remains unclear whether Pavo, Polyplectron and Argusianus form a monophyletic clade in which ocelli evolved once. We estimated the phylogeny of the ocellated species using sequences from 1966 ultraconserved elements (UCEs) and three mitochondrial regions. The three ocellated genera did form a strongly supported clade, but each ocellated genus was sister to at least one genus without ocelli. Indeed, Polyplectron and Galloperdix, a genus not previously suggested to be related to any ocellated taxon, were sister genera. The close relationship between taxa with and without ocelli suggests multiple gains or losses. Independent gains, possibly reflecting a pre-existing bias for eye-like structures among females and/or the existence of a simple mutational pathway for the origin of ocelli, appears to be the most likely explanation. (paywall)

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Comments
UD is right on another case where convergent evolution must be invoked to explain a result in biology. normal evolution won't do. pretty soon all biology will be just convergent evolution with unexplained gaps. Its the end of dumb ideas created or supported to oppose christian origin science.Robert Byers
July 21, 2014
July
07
Jul
21
21
2014
08:52 PM
8
08
52
PM
PDT

Leave a Reply