Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Where Did The Water Come From?

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Having read the recent post here on where Earth’s water came from, I just stumbled across an interesting article over at ExtremeTech.com from June of this year, evidently commenting on a find that was originally reported in Science (at least, that’s what I’ve gathered from reading a bit about it elsewhere). I’m not sure if anything came of this or if it was mentioned here and I missed it (I couldn’t find it in a search), but I thought it might spark some interesting discussion.

From the article, titled Scientists discover an ocean 400 miles beneath our feet that could fill our oceans three times over:

After decades of theorizing and searching, scientists are reporting that they’ve finally found a massive reservoir of water in the Earth’s mantle — a reservoir so vast that could fill the Earth’s oceans three times over. This discovery suggests that Earth’s surface water actually came from within, as part of a “whole-Earth water cycle,” rather than the prevailing theory of icy comets striking Earth billions of years ago.

….

This new study, authored by a range of geophysicists and scientists from across the US, leverages data from the USArray — an array of hundreds of seismographs located throughout the US that are constantly listening to movements in the Earth’s mantle and core. After listening for a few years, and carrying out lots of complex calculations, the researchers believe that they’ve found a huge reserve of water that’s located in the transition zone between the upper and lower mantle — a region that occupies between 400 and 660 kilometers (250-410 miles) below our feet.

….

Finally, here’s a fun thought that should remind us that Earth’s perfect composition and climate is, if you look very closely, rather miraculous. One of the researchers, talking to New Scientist, said that if the water wasn’t stored underground, “it would be on the surface of the Earth, and mountaintops would be the only land poking out.” Maybe if the formation of Earth had be a little different, or if we were marginally closer to the Sun, or if a random asteroid didn’t land here billions of years ago… you probably wouldn’t be sitting here surfing the web.

Thoughts?

Comments
bystander, I think we have just illustrated the problem with Darwinian predictions. They are routinely so utterly frivolous that your attempt to sarcastically ape them looked no different to me than the most sober of Darwinian proclamations about the marvelous predictive power of Evolutionary Theory.HeKS
September 29, 2014
September
09
Sep
29
29
2014
09:39 PM
9
09
39
PM
PDT
Of course I was being sarcastic I thought the 'Hmm..'(Thinking :-) ) will make that clear!the bystander
September 29, 2014
September
09
Sep
29
29
2014
08:33 PM
8
08
33
PM
PDT
@Eric Anderson #13 LOL. Yes, if he was being sarcastic that would have been helpful to know. You really just never know when it comes to "The Amazing Predictions of Evolutionary Theory" (TM)HeKS
September 29, 2014
September
09
Sep
29
29
2014
07:55 PM
7
07
55
PM
PDT
@the bystander #11 So, you're saying Evolution predicts that at the time when there was only water, any animals living would have lived in water, and that animals wouldn't live on land until there was land for animals to live on? What a brilliant Darwinian prediction that is. And, BTW, you seem to be describing some situation where the sun formed after the earth, but what the article you're referring to is actually saying is that some of the water that eventually became part of our oceans is older than the sun. It's not saying that our oceans themselves, or our planet, is older than the sun.HeKS
September 29, 2014
September
09
Sep
29
29
2014
07:53 PM
7
07
53
PM
PDT
the bystander: You might want to put a "/sarc" tag at the end of your comment, just so no-one thinks you were being serious.Eric Anderson
September 29, 2014
September
09
Sep
29
29
2014
07:49 PM
7
07
49
PM
PDT
the bystander:
Hmm… this scenario seems to be exactly what Darwin predicts in his theory of Evolution.
Amazing. I must have missed this prediction. I also missed the part where this prediction was proved. I, too, can imagine all sorts of scenarios. But surely you jest.Mapou
September 29, 2014
September
09
Sep
29
29
2014
07:47 PM
7
07
47
PM
PDT
Interesting. Combined with the other article, we can conclude that Earth was more or less completely covered with water , and since Sun formed later than water, there would have been no evaporation. So what ever organisms existed during those period would be adapted to darkness and aquatic life. When Sun formed, water would have evaporated and life would have adapted to exposed land - Hmm... this scenario seems to be exactly what Darwin predicts in his theory of Evolution.the bystander
September 29, 2014
September
09
Sep
29
29
2014
07:27 PM
7
07
27
PM
PDT
The above article combined with this one sounds very Genesis 1 like. http://www.newsweek.com/much-earths-water-older-sun-and-came-deep-space-273289beau
September 29, 2014
September
09
Sep
29
29
2014
06:35 PM
6
06
35
PM
PDT
Or under our feet WhicheverVishnu
September 29, 2014
September
09
Sep
29
29
2014
06:18 PM
6
06
18
PM
PDT
SpaceVishnu
September 29, 2014
September
09
Sep
29
29
2014
06:16 PM
6
06
16
PM
PDT
...if the water wasn’t stored underground, “it would be on the surface of the Earth, and mountaintops would be the only land poking out.”
...probably wouldn’t be sitting here surfing the web.
that's right, most probably would be up there near the mountaintops surfing the high water :)Dionisio
September 29, 2014
September
09
Sep
29
29
2014
05:44 PM
5
05
44
PM
PDT
This also seems to support Dr. Walt Browns hydroplate theory: http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/HydroplateOverview2.htmlsagebrush gardener
September 29, 2014
September
09
Sep
29
29
2014
05:41 PM
5
05
41
PM
PDT
KF @ 1: I don't know that Ken Ham himself has commented on this, but it was discussed in an AiG article by Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell on April 17, 2014: https://answersingenesis.org/geology/rocks-and-minerals/diamond-ringwoodite-reveals-water-deep-earths-mantle/sagebrush gardener
September 29, 2014
September
09
Sep
29
29
2014
05:37 PM
5
05
37
PM
PDT
Interesting article. Thanks. BTW, minor observation:
Maybe if the formation of Earth had been a little different,...
Dionisio
September 29, 2014
September
09
Sep
29
29
2014
05:23 PM
5
05
23
PM
PDT
Alice's Adventures in Water-Land Air and Water: The Biology and Physics of Life's Media Water and Life: The Unique Properties of H2OMung
September 29, 2014
September
09
Sep
29
29
2014
05:13 PM
5
05
13
PM
PDT
Ah water. It's a beautiful illusion. Not really required for life. Atoms colliding in the void. Contrary theories are all wet.Mung
September 29, 2014
September
09
Sep
29
29
2014
05:05 PM
5
05
05
PM
PDT
Blub, blub, blub. Maybe we would be glorified fish then? KF PS: Has Mr Ham of AiG commented yet on this?kairosfocus
September 29, 2014
September
09
Sep
29
29
2014
05:00 PM
5
05
00
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply