Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

At Mind Matters News: Researchers: If we tell folks more about science, they trust less

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Part 3: The researchers argue that doubts about science arise from conflict with beliefs. The many COVID-19 debacles suggest other causes…

“It may not be researchers’ fault that “the science” was grievously misrepresented by others. But they still have a lot of ground to make up with the thoughtful proportion of the public. And the next insight shared is hardly going to help: “Counterintuitively, increasing someone’s general scientific literacy can actually backfire, because it provides the skill to better bolster their pre-existing beliefs. Increasing scientific reasoning and media literacy skills, prebunking, or inoculating people against misinformation are advised instead, as is framing information in line with what matters to your audience and using relatable personal experiences. – Tessa Koumondoros, “These 4 Factors Can Explain Why So Many People Are Rejecting Science” at Sciencealert (July 16, 2022) The paper requires a fee or subscription.”

This sounds so much like: Don’t rely on telling people how to think about science; try “inoculating people against misinformation” which, in the context, sounds like: Come up with more convincing propaganda.

The trouble is, the COVID pandemic was practically a laboratory experiment in watching claims about science self-destruct. People who noticed probably won’t forget. And their science literacy may well have increased in a way no one anticipated: a much deeper agnosticism about claims made in science’s name.

News, “Researchers: If we tell folks more about science, they trust less” at Mind Matters News (July 20, 2022)

Takehome: Generally, the remedy for loss of trust after widespread failures is reform of the system, not reform of its doubters. Post-COVID, scientists should take heed.

Note: The paper itself, which requires a subscription, is “Why are people antiscience, and what can we do about it?” by Aviva Philipp-Muller, Spike W. S. Lee, and Richard E. Petty, July 12, 2022, PNAS 119 (30) e2120755119 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120755119


Here are Parts 1 and 2:

Why many now reject science… do you really want to know? COVID demonstrated — as nothing else could — that the “science” was all over the map and didn’t help people avoid panic. As the panic receded, the government started setting up a disinformation board to target NON-government sources of panic, thus deepening loss of trust.

and

Researchers: Distrust of science is due to tribal loyalty. In Part 2 of 4, we look at a claim arising from a recent study: We blindly believe those we identify with, ignoring the wisdom of science. There seems to be no recognition that researchers, however fiercely competitive among themselves, also have a tribal loyalty that skews their judgment.

Comments
Andrew at 7, Get over it. I wear a mask at work daily and when I go shopping. I've had experience dealing with patients in quarantine. This is no different. If people think they can go without and they get infected, words are not going to help them.relatd
July 22, 2022
July
07
Jul
22
22
2022
08:11 AM
8
08
11
AM
PDT
AaronS1978, They've moved past the lies. Onto masks again! Andrewasauber
July 22, 2022
July
07
Jul
22
22
2022
07:50 AM
7
07
50
AM
PDT
Just a friendly reminder of where a lot of the mistrust came from https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3PrUKA4dFnU&fbclid=IwAR1VmwTqT-NSz0OUshSt-lG9_VhJUElChEq_9vAa_QOswLEv7zXZK2iengcAaronS1978
July 22, 2022
July
07
Jul
22
22
2022
07:17 AM
7
07
17
AM
PDT
"Come up with more convincing propaganda." Yes. Lie to them if you have to. Andrewasauber
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
07:21 AM
7
07
21
AM
PDT
@Belfast I’m talking about this article https://www.sciencealert.com/distrust-in-science-is-causing-harm-but-these-researchers-have-a-plan The one being critiqued A portion of it says that’s it bad that people that have a better understanding of science can better defend their own beliefs “Counterintuitively, increasing someone’s general scientific literacy can actually backfire, because it provides the skill to better bolster their pre-existing beliefs.“ Or at least that’s what I’m getting from it But so far they are blaming everyone else but them selves for the issue even as far as saying being a deductive thinker because of science could back fire because you can better reason your own beliefs Comically apply that EXACT SAME logic to our science enlightened atheistsAaronS1978
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
12:20 AM
12
12
20
AM
PDT
@Aaron, It says nothing of the kind. And it’s just one of a growing perception and real understanding of Richard Feyman’s dictum that outside their particular field a scientist is just the same as another person. To which is added that a scientist-administrator has forgotten all principles os the science he/she learned when young. If “inoculating against misinformation” isn’t commo-speech nothing is.Belfast
July 20, 2022
July
07
Jul
20
20
2022
08:57 PM
8
08
57
PM
PDT
Yeah the article pretty much for the most part says teaching people about science allows them to think more for themselves and that’s badAaronS1978
July 20, 2022
July
07
Jul
20
20
2022
08:19 PM
8
08
19
PM
PDT
When I read, “ This sounds so much like: “Don’t rely on telling people how to think about science; try “inoculating people against misinformation” which, in the context, sounds like: Come up with more convincing propaganda,” I immediately thought, “Hello, that’s O'Leary talking.” Fáilte ar ais, Denise.Belfast
July 20, 2022
July
07
Jul
20
20
2022
06:54 PM
6
06
54
PM
PDT
1 2 3

Leave a Reply