Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

At Mind Matters News: Why many now reject science… do you really want to know? Part 1

Categories
Intelligent Design
Philosophy
Science
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

COVID demonstrated — as nothing else could — that the “science” was all over the map and didn’t help people avoid panic:

Science-sponsored panic probably drove up the damage from COVID. Jay Richards, one of the authors of The Price of Panic: How the Tyranny of Experts Turned a Pandemic into a Catastrophe (October 2020), has noted, “In working on the book, we watched social media and platforms such as Google Search manipulate news coverage of the pandemic. It was, honestly, terrifying to watch important stories and studies get buried in real time on Google searches. It was also distressing to watch Twitter and Facebook attach warnings to the advice and viewpoint of scientists who urged calm and caution, while boosting the views of “officials” such as Anthony Fauci and WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom.”

And, just as most of the world was getting the impression that the pandemic — and the panic — had largely run their course, up pops a proposal in 2021 for a “reality czar” to fight disinformation and misinformation, as if all of that were coming from non-government or non-science sources. The proposal was (we are told) put on hold after the fear of just consequences prevailed.

News, “Why many now reject science… do you really want to know?” at Mind Matters News (July 17, 2022)

Takehome: As the panic receded, the government started setting up a disinformation board to target NON-government sources of panic, thus deepening loss of trust.


You may also wish to read: Did social media panic drive up the damage from COVID-19? Richards: It was, honestly, terrifying to watch important stories and studies get buried in real time on Google searches. Social media did a very good job of panicking the population about COVID-19, instead of relaying facts, says Jay Richards, an author of The Price of Panic.

Comments
Climate Change: Global Sea Level […] HIGHLIGHTS Sea level has risen 8–9 inches (21–24 centimeters) since 1880. In 2020, global sea level set a new record high—91.3 mm (3.6 inches) above 1993 levels. The rate of sea level rise is accelerating: it has more than doubled from 0.06 inches (1.4 millimeters) per year throughout most of the twentieth century to 0.14 inches (3.6 millimeters) per year from 2006–2015. In many locations along the U.S. coastline, high-tide flooding is now 300% to more than 900% more frequent than it was 50 years ago. If we are able to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, U.S. sea level in 2100 is projected to be around 0.6 meters (2 feet) higher on average than it was in 2000. On a pathway with high greenhouse gas emissions and rapid ice sheet collapse, models project that average sea level rise for the contiguous United States could be 2.2 meters (7.2 feet) by 2100 and 3.9 meters (13 feet) by 2150. […] Global mean sea level has risen about 8–9 inches (21–24 centimeters) since 1880, with about a third of that coming in just the last two and a half decades. The rising water level is mostly due to a combination of melt water from glaciers and ice sheets and thermal expansion of seawater as it warms. In 2020, global mean sea level was 91.3 millimeters (3.6 inches) above the 1993 average, making it the highest annual average in the satellite record (1993-present). The global mean water level in the ocean rose by 0.14 inches (3.6 millimeters) per year from 2006–2015, which was 2.5 times the average rate of 0.06 inches (1.4 millimeters) per year throughout most of the twentieth century. By the end of the century, global mean sea level is likely to rise at least one foot (0.3 meters) above 2000 levels, even if greenhouse gas emissions follow a relatively low pathway in coming decades. In some ocean basins, sea level has risen as much as 6-8 inches (15-20 centimeters) since the start of the satellite record. Regional differences exist because of natural variability in the strength of winds and ocean currents, which influence how much and where the deeper layers of the ocean store heat.
Seversky
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
09:29 AM
9
09
29
AM
PST
Relatd
I was told Russian ICBMS were about to fall on my head at any time during the 1960s. I barely gave it a second thought. Same here – for most people.
What difference would it have made had you given it any thought? Like everyone else, including me, you are powerless to change events, be they nuclear war or destruction of the human environment due to climate change. Money rules and money decides.Alan Fox
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
09:15 AM
9
09
15
AM
PST
Querius at 151, I completely disagree with 8. No one knows. Literally no one knows. I did read the early How to Fiddle With The Climate ideas. They ran from ridiculous to more ridiculous. Most people have no clue how climate works. Some just know that 'it's complicated.' Nothing more. I'm not saying most people are or want to be stupid but there are more important - to the average person - things to deal with on a daily basis. Example: I was told Russian ICBMS were about to fall on my head at any time during the 1960s. I barely gave it a second thought. Same here - for most people.relatd
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
08:59 AM
8
08
59
AM
PST
And great posts from Lieutenant Commander Data, ET, Relatd, and Marfin @146-149! Thank you! -QQuerius
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
08:58 AM
8
08
58
AM
PST
We're being spammed by an unending stream of vacuous posts by a suspiciously familiar trollbot now named "Alan Fox." The actual facts are: 1. Historical temperature data have been fiddled. This has been proven. 2. The #1 greenhouse gas by far is water vapor. 3. CO2 is plant food. In return, plants give off O2. This is a good thing. 4. When CO2 levels drop below 200 ppm, the plants on earth will die. This is not a good thing. 5. The ideal CO2 level for plants is about 2000 ppm. 6. The Biggest Factor affecting climate is the bright yellow ball in the sky visible from Alan Fox's room at the asylum. 7. Climate stasis is pure science fantasy developed by and for bureaucrats with authoritarian ambitions. 8. Climate interventions commonly proposed by eminent scientists will most certainly kill the planet. -QQuerius
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
08:54 AM
8
08
54
AM
PST
I stopped believing in TV weather a long time ago. Even with Improved Technology (TM) they are just as likely to get it wrong as to get it right. I now use an "old" method. I look out the window before going out. Easier. Cheaper. And no commercials.relatd
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
08:52 AM
8
08
52
AM
PST
I live in Ireland , now I play golf and ride a motorcycle so I check the weather forecast regularly to see if it will be dry on the weekend so I can golf or motorcycle (yes I am a wimp) . The meteorological office in Ireland use weather models to predict the weather but I find they change the weekend forecast 3 or 4 times during the week and its really only come Friday they will be sure of the forecast come the weekend. So if the computer models they use cannot predict the weather a week in advance why on earth would I believe they can predict the climate 100 years from now, seeing that climate models are much more complex and have far more variables.Marfin
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
08:49 AM
8
08
49
AM
PST
Guys, There are rules for confusing people. First, throw graphs at them. Then you bury them in data, followed by more data. Then you mix that all together and promote vague interpretations. Just make sure you have plenty of vague interpretations. Meanwhile, Tesla exceeded expectations, and more electric cars and charging stations are coming. It's all about money. Just money. From today's The Street: "Tesla (TSLA) - Get Tesla Inc. Report shares jumped higher Thursday after the carmaker topped Wall Street's second quarter earnings forecasts and reiterated its goal for full-year delivery growth despite input price pressures and narrowing profit margins." "The group also said it expects full year deliveries to grow 50% from 2021 levels, implying a target of 1.4 million vehicles that Tesla CFO Zachary Kirkhorn said has become "more difficult but remains possible with strong execution."relatd
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
08:19 AM
8
08
19
AM
PST
Right Alan. Anyone but you, apparently. The "warming" is 0.06C above some arbitrary line.. Anyone can see that. And it is too late for you. You are too stupid to understand the science involved.ET
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
08:12 AM
8
08
12
AM
PST
Over 30,000 Scientists Declare Climate Change A Hoax Climate "experts" missed 53 prediction from 53 :))) It's not easy to miss all the answers from an exam, only geniuses do that . :) 9 Things You Need To Know About The Climate Change HoaxLieutenant Commander Data
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
08:10 AM
8
08
10
AM
PST
Are you blind? The graph shows that all alleged warming is gone. There hasn’t been any warming trend in years.
You must be looking at a different graph. Anyone can follow your link and look for themselves. It's all too late, anyway. I wish I was wrong but here we are.Alan Fox
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
08:08 AM
8
08
08
AM
PST
And, unlike you, they should be able to read for comprehension.ET
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
08:07 AM
8
08
07
AM
PST
JH at 90, Baloney. The first rule of Fight Club is to talk about "climate change" as if it's real. "Climate Change" is just a propaganda campaign to get people to spend trillions of dollars on electric cars, and other things. In real, actual news, General Motors is building charging stations for the day when everyone will have no choice but to buy an electric car.relatd
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
08:07 AM
8
08
07
AM
PST
ET
Alan needs to learn how to read.. There isn’t anything in comment 116 that supports hos alleged prediction.
Anyone can look for themselves.Alan Fox
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
08:05 AM
8
08
05
AM
PST
Asauber
AF, This is just a lie. Pathetic. Andrew
No, it's a fact. I didn't name the mountain range but the mountains I see from my terrace are the Pyrenees. https://phys.org/news/2021-09-documents-loss-pyrenees-glaciers.htmlAlan Fox
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
08:03 AM
8
08
03
AM
PST
Alan needs to learn how to read.. There isn't anything in comment 116 that supports hos alleged prediction.ET
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
08:00 AM
8
08
00
AM
PST
You predicted that you are too stupid to respond to comments? Really?
Nope, in comment 98, I wrote:
Now JoeG will chime in to say that is better for plants. The dead plants in my garden disagree.
You chime in at comment 116.Alan Fox
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
07:59 AM
7
07
59
AM
PST
Only scientifically illiterate fools thin k that fossil fuels are a problem. The earth is getting greener. However, our misuse of the land is a problem. Animal agriculture is a problem. Trash is a problem. Yet the moron politicians are focusing on CO2 because they are just ignorant. Makes my think that Alan is a politician.ET
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
07:59 AM
7
07
59
AM
PST
Alan honest question , say temperature has increased by 1.5 deg c in last 150 years , would you prefer to raise a family 150 years ago or now , if so why.Marfin
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
07:55 AM
7
07
55
AM
PST
Again, only scientifically illiterate fools think that CO2 has anything to do with global warming/ climate change. Physics says that it is impossible for such low concentrations of CO2 to have any noticeable effect on temperatures. There is a reason why it still gets cold at night in deserts even though CO2 is the primary GHG there. I doubt that Alan understands physics.ET
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
07:54 AM
7
07
54
AM
PST
The deck chairs nearly always end up in the same place here.
Sorry, Jerry, I missed this before. Well, that's true. ;) It's too late, now, but perhaps the way to have sold the idea of reducing carbon emissions was to have promoted the ancillary benefits of leaving fossil fuel in the ground. But the fossil fuel industries have been too rich and powerful and thus run politics, especially in the US. Look at Joe Manchin. Look at his campaign funds. Look at the source of those campaign funds. Look how he delivers for his puppet-masters.Alan Fox
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
07:53 AM
7
07
53
AM
PST
Alan Fox:
My prediction is confirmed! Thanks, Joe.
You predicted that you are too stupid to respond to comments? Really? Nicely done, then.ET
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
07:51 AM
7
07
51
AM
PST
Alan Fox:
Odd that Europe doesn’t get a mention here.
Perhaps you should learn how to think.ET
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
07:50 AM
7
07
50
AM
PST
Alan Fox:
Do you look at your own links? The graph in that article shows a clear and significant rising trend.
Are you blind? The graph shows that all alleged warming is gone. There hasn't been any warming trend in years.ET
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
07:48 AM
7
07
48
AM
PST
"unprecedented 420ppm" Been higher in the past, according to (proxy)records. Another lie. Andrewasauber
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
07:41 AM
7
07
41
AM
PST
Asauber
Predictions aren’t facts.
The changes I referred to are historic. CO2 has gone up from 260ppm to an unprecedented 420ppm in my lifetime. Glaciers are not predictions. There are old photographs. You can look up the observed changes. Changes in sea ice and level are facts. People keep records.Alan Fox
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
07:38 AM
7
07
38
AM
PST
Alan- you clearly do not know anything about greenhouse gasses and climate change. The atmosphere actually needs more CO2. And the real problem is how we farm the land. The overuse of pesticides and fertilizers are the real problems. But Alan has a one-track mind. Unfortunately, he is on the wrong track.
My prediction is confirmed! Thanks, Joe.Alan Fox
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
07:33 AM
7
07
33
AM
PST
Again, for the learning impaired: The latest satellite data says that all alleged warming is gone!
Do you look at your own links? The graph in that article shows a clear and significant rising trend.Alan Fox
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
07:29 AM
7
07
29
AM
PST
Blame La Nina (sic) for the lack of rain in Europe.
Odd that Europe doesn't get a mention here.Alan Fox
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
07:26 AM
7
07
26
AM
PST
Again, for the learning impaired: The latest satellite data says that all alleged warming is gone! Reality Refutes Alan's Fear MongeringET
July 21, 2022
July
07
Jul
21
21
2022
07:25 AM
7
07
25
AM
PST
1 2 3 4 5 8

Leave a Reply