Philosopher asks, what do you want to know about intelligent design?

Is the conclusion that the universe was designed -- and that the design extends deeply into life -- science, philosophy, religion, or what? In a sense it hardly matters. By far the most important question is not what category we place it in, but whether a conclusion is true. A true philosophical or religious conclusion is no less true than a true scientific one. Although universities might divide their faculty and courses into academic categories, reality is not obliged to respect such boundaries. ~ Michael Behe Of course the argument form If X were true, it would be inconvenient for science; therefore, X is false is at best moderately compelling. We aren’t just given that the Lord has arranged the universe for the comfort and convenience of the National Academy of Science. To think otherwise is to be like the drunk who insisted on looking for his lost car keys under the streetlight, on the grounds that the light was better there. (In fact it would go the drunk one better: it would be to insist that because the keys would be hard to find in the dark, they must be under the light.) ~ Alvin Plantinga bevets

I would want to know whether intelligent design is science, because I don't know what it means to say that intelligent design is true. Now, Prof. Monton may get the definition correct, but that doesn't prevent him from writing: The way intelligent design proponents typically portray their activity is that they are looking for scientific evidence for the existence of a designer. Mung