Intelligent Design Philosophy Science

Will the Tokyo Olympics be a “super-evolutionary” COVID-19 event?

Spread the love

That’s the question at Wired:

This is the worst worst-case scenario. “There are plenty of eco-evolutionary scenarios where this isn’t a traditional super-spreader event, but a ‘super-evolutionary event,’” Scarpino says, “where a critical mass of vaccinated individuals are selecting for variants that have increased transmissibility in vaccinated individuals.” All those people with differing immune statuses and different exposures to different strains of the virus could create a terrifying genetic parody of Olympism’s international cooperation: a free and open exchange of viral ideas on how to be more infectious, maybe even more deadly or more vaccine-evasive. And then it’d travel back to everyone’s home country under the cover of asymptomatic spread.

There are two extremes on the scale of probability. The best outcome anyone can hope for at this point is that with the screening program in place, only a few people will get infected or ill. A few Olympic stories will end badly. That’s already happening—athletes and the people who work with them have been denied a chance to compete in Tokyo because testing shows they’re infected. And on the far side of the scale is a super-evolutionary event that allows the development of an even more potent form of the virus and then puts it on hundreds of jet planes headed to every corner of the planet. For everyone wondering what the most likely outcome is, it’s like the Olympics, except only in the most terrifying way possible: It’s unpredictable.

Adam Rogers, “The Olympics Could Be a Covid-19 ‘Super-Evolutionary Event’” at Wired (July 22, 2021)

Just a thought: A hypothesis in science can be confuted by evidence. If it can’t, it is not a hypothesis in science. It may be a fine scare story but that’s a wholly different matter and we will let the publishers and filmmakers deal with it.

So: If there is no “super-evolutionary event” as a result of the Tokyo Olympics, is there anything that we can reasonably conclude? Could we conclude, for example, that natural selection is not necessarily the terrifying creative force that some have claimed?

No hurry. Just wondering.

5 Replies to “Will the Tokyo Olympics be a “super-evolutionary” COVID-19 event?

  1. 1
    Bob O'H says:

    So: If there is no “super-evolutionary event” as a result of the Tokyo Olympics, is there anything that we can reasonably conclude?

    That we’d need more replications to come to any scientific conclusion.

  2. 2
    asauber says:

    So, what was the vaccine for again?

    “Tuesday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended wearing masks indoors in areas experiencing a surge in COVID-19 cases — including for those who are fully vaccinated.”


  3. 3
    ET says:

    We already know that natural selection is not a creative force. We already know that NS is impotent with respect to producing the diversity of life.

    But without a full gambit of spectators I doubt the Olympics will become a super spreader.

  4. 4
    AaronS1978 says:

    Wow what a way to overdramatize something, it was a super evolutionary event when it infected India

    Millions upon millions of people of already been infected. People around the globe I’ve already gotten on planes while infected.
    That’s how my wife and I got it which was while flying she picked it up
    We’ve been seeing this around the world now for almost a year.

    Everything the author is worried about has already happened in spades

  5. 5
    zweston says:

    Looks like an upstart apologist has kicked the Darwin hornets’ nest on youtube… want to join in the conversation?

    He led off with “Darwin’s Doubt” premise of Cambrian explosion and fossil record… saying there will be 12-15 parts.

Leave a Reply