Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Model: Quantum wave collapse creates gravitational fields, may be testable

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Uniting quantum mechanics and gravity at last. From Anil Ananthaswamy at New Scientist

One approach towards reconciling gravity with quantum mechanics has been to show that gravity at its most fundamental comes in indivisible parcels called quanta, much like the electromagnetic force comes in quanta called photons. But this road to a theory of quantum gravity has so far proved impassable.

Now Antoine Tilloy at the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics in Garching, Germany, has attempted to get at gravity by tweaking standard quantum mechanics.

Odd that no one has thought of this before, given all the strenuous mental effort that has gone into the topic… But now,

Nonetheless, his model makes predictions that can be tested. For example, it predicts that gravity will behave differently at the scale of atoms from how it does on larger scales. Should those tests find that Tilloy’s model reflects reality and gravity does indeed originate from collapsing quantum fluctuations, it would be a big clue that the path to a theory of everything would involve semiclassical gravity. More.

The main thing is, it’s good that testability still matters somewhere.

See also: Physicist at Forbes; Is the inflationary universe not science any more?

and

Question for multiverse theorists: To what can science appeal, if not evidence?

Comments
Without reading the article and watching the video I can say with certainty that the title and the first sentence of the OP is wrong for 2 reasons...lets see... I would love to be found wrong about this... Just finished reading: "unifying all the fundamental forces underpinning the laws of physics on scales large and small. For example, Tilloy’s model can be used to get gravity as described by Newton’s theory, but the maths still has to be worked out to see if it is effective in describing gravity as governed by Einstein’s general relativity." The math doesn't add up... One theory has to be wrong... Most likely relativity...J-Mac
September 30, 2017
September
09
Sep
30
30
2017
06:32 PM
6
06
32
PM
PDT
Odd that no one has thought of this before, given all the strenuous mental effort that has gone into the topic… But now, Really. The phrase before the comma by itself would seem like a dig at the New Scientist writer. The 'sentence' as a whole (single quotes given its composition with ellipses) and the sarcasm would seem like sticking out the neck by non-scientist composer, given the serious scientific effort over the decades. Or maybe not.groovamos
September 30, 2017
September
09
Sep
30
30
2017
06:22 AM
6
06
22
AM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply