Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Physics we don’t need: Social physics

arroba Email

In his new book, “Social Physics,” Alex Pentland, a prominent data scientist at M.I.T., shows as much uncritical enthusiasm for prediction as Tucker, while making a case that we need a new science — social physics — that can make sense of all the digital bread crumbs, from call records to credit card transactions, that we leave as we navigate our daily life. (That the idea of social physics was once promoted by the positivist Auguste Comte, one scholar who would have warmed to the idea of Big Data, goes unmentioned.)

What is social physics good for? It would allow us to detect and improve “idea flow” — the way ideas and behaviors travel through social networks. For example, Pentland wants to arm employers with sophisticated gadgets that would allow them to monitor the communicative activities of their employees and coax them toward more productive behaviors so their cognitive activity isn’t wasted on trifles. More.

They used to call that kind of thing Nineteen Eighty Four, but updates happen.

Haha! How silly of me; not physicists at all! Someone pass the coffee. Bateman
I have graduate degrees in the social sciences, and I would like to stake my territory from such a physicist. For one, this individual seems ignorant about the progress social science has already made regarding social networks: it's called Social Network Analysis (not just the internet kind of social network), and the US intelligence community has already successfully used this tactic to find terrorists. Companies have used it to target consumers. It's been done, physicists! Go back to theories of everything! Bateman

Leave a Reply