Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Newly discovered ant species supports controversial species theory?

Queen ant of parasitic and host species/Christian Rabeling/ University of Rochester

Evidence for sympatric speciation

From ScienceDaily:

The ant, only found in a single patch of eucalyptus trees on the São Paulo State University campus in Brazil, branched off from its original species while living in the same colony, something thought rare in current models of evolutionary development.

“Most new species come about in geographic isolation,” said Christian Rabeling, assistant professor of biology at the University of Rochester. “We now have evidence that speciation can take place within a single colony.”

“Since Darwin’s Origin of Species, evolutionary biologists have long debated whether two species can evolve from a common ancestor without being geographically isolated from each other,” said Ted Schultz, curator of ants at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History and co-author of the study. “With this study, we offer a compelling case for sympatric evolution that will open new conversations in the debate about speciation in these ants, social insects and evolutionary biology more generally.”

M. castrator is not simply another ant in the colony; it’s a parasite that lives with — and off of — its host, Mycocepurus goeldii. The host is a fungus-growing ant that cultivates fungus for its nutritional value, both for itself and, indirectly, for its parasite, which does not participate in the work of growing the fungus garden. That led the researchers to study the genetic relationships of all fungus-growing ants in South America, including all five known and six newly discovered species of the genus Mycocepurus, to determine whether the parasite did evolve from its presumed host. They found that the parasitic ants were, indeed, genetically very close to M. goeldii, but not to the other ant species.

They also determined that the parasitic ants were no longer reproductively compatible with the host ants — making them a unique species — and had stopped reproducing with their host a mere 37,000 years ago — a very short period on the evolutionary scale.

But wait:

Rabeling explained that just comparing some nuclear and mitochondrial genes may not be enough to demonstrate that the parasitic ants are a completely new species. “We are now sequencing the entire mitochondrial and nuclear genomes of these parasitic ants and their host in an effort to confirm speciation and the underlying genetic mechanism.” Interesting:
The parasitic ants need to exercise discretion because taking advantage of the host species is considered taboo in ant society. Offending ants have been known to be killed by worker mobs. As a result, the parasitic queen of the new species has evolved into a smaller size, making them difficult to distinguish from a host worker. More.

Evolved into a smaller size? Or just never got enough to eat, given that she has had to “exercise discretion” since she was a dab of royal jelly. That’d be interesting to test.

Here’s the abstract:

Inquiline social parasitic ant species exploit colonies of other ant species mainly by producing sexual offspring that are raised by the host. Ant social parasites and their hosts are often close relatives (Emery’s rule), and two main hypotheses compete to explain the parasites’ evolutionary origins: (1) the interspecific hypothesis proposes an allopatric speciation scenario for the parasite, whereas (2) the intraspecific hypothesis postulates that the parasite evolves directly from its host in sympatry [ 1–10 ]. Evidence in support of the intraspecific hypothesis has been accumulating for ants [ 3, 5, 7, 9–12 ], but sympatric speciation remains controversial as a general speciation mechanism for inquiline parasites. Here we use molecular phylogenetics to assess whether the socially parasitic fungus-growing ant Mycocepurus castrator speciated from its host Mycocepurus goeldii in sympatry. Based on differing patterns of relationship in mitochondrial and individual nuclear genes, we conclude that host and parasite occupy a temporal window in which lineage sorting has taken place in the mitochondrial genes but not yet in the nuclear alleles. We infer that the host originated first and that the parasite originated subsequently from a subset of the host species’ populations, providing empirical support for the hypothesis that inquiline parasites can evolve reproductive isolation while living sympatrically with their hosts. Registration wall

Follow UD News at Twitter!

There have been other examples of at least suspected sympatric speciation. The difficulty with it as a concept is figuring out how two populations of one species, in contact with each other, became reproductively isolated so that selection pressure could act differently on them. Allopatric speciation, with a barrier between groups, is much easier to envision - an isolated population receives different selection pressure than the main population. Since this works best if the isolated population is small, it also explains the lack of transitional fossils - there were very few transitional animals to begin with. An example of sympatric speciation is welcome, but does not overturn anyone's apple cart. Few are arguing that sympatric speciation cannot happen, only that it is likely to be rare. tkeithlu
OT: The wit of Denyse O'Leary: Catholics & Evolution [God & Evolution] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TA780yWDZAI bornagain77

Leave a Reply