Help me out here: are these simple but accurate descriptions of where each school of thought stands?
(a) Naturalism (evolutionism) says that matter just happens to have the properties to sometimes spontaneously lead to life, life that can improve itself through evolution.
(b) Theistic evolution says that God designed matter to have the properties to sometimes spontaneously lead to life, life that can improve itself through evolution.
(c) Intelligent design says that matter does not have the properties to spontaneously lead to life, and that it is entirely unclear whether life can improve itself through evolution. It is more likely, perhaps even evident, that evolution can make, at most, only minor changes.
Does this briefly describe each school of thought? Are there other schools of thought other than nuances of these positions? Let me know where you agree or disagree.