One thing scientists never, ever do is multiply entities, but not so for evolutionists: Read more
Comments
Where to start!?
OK I'll ask two obvious questions. The paper states that some animals may have evolved bio-fluorescence for camouflage against algae and coral that also bio-fluoresce. This does nothing to explain how/why the algae and coral bio-fluoresce in the first place?
Aside from the obvious: how does a blind undirected process "evolve" such a highly specified function like bio-fluorescence? johnp
Dr Hunter, as to:
"Evolution adds nothing to the science."
You are too kind. The reality of the situation is that:
"Evolution hinders and thus subtracts from science". bornagain77