Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Physics prof Eric Hedin has a ticket on the Ball Street Railroad

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Hedin_Eric.jpg

An interesting piece in the San Francisco Chronicle spells out the problems assistant prof Eric Hedin is having at Ball State U in Muncie, Indiana, where he teaches an honours course exploring the nature of the universe. He is accused by atheists of promoting intelligent design, and is under investigation. Here is who is investigating him, according to John West of the Discovery Institute, who did some research:

The three other panelists [besides Catherine Pilachowski, an astronomy prof from Indiana U who has chaired the American Astronomy Society] are Ball State faculty members Gary Dodson, a professor of biology; Juli Thorson Eflin, a professor of philosophy; and Richard Fluegeman Jr., a professor of geological sciences.

West said Pilachowski was on the governing council of AAS when it issued a declaration denouncing intelligent design in 2005 and stating that it should not be taught in science classes.

He also said Dodson signed an anti-creationism petition circulated by the lobbying group the National Center for Science Education and that in 2009, Dodson was a presenter and discussion leader for a Darwin Day conference organized by the Ball State Freethought Alliance.

Fluegeman delivered the opening lecture at the same Darwin Day conference.

Some of us suspect that the problem is a bit like this: The fine tuning of our universe suggests it is designed. The only serious alternative these days is the multiverse, for which there is no evidence.

So anyone who sets forth the facts honestly could be got on charges of non-atheism.

Hey, ya gotta choose: Lies, nonsense… or just don’t teach. Call it, if you like, the Ball State Railroad.

(We’ve covered this story here. And here.)

Note: Yes, that’s the same place as just hired exoplanet hunter Guillermo “Earth is special” Gonzalez. Maybe Hedin can get him to teach a few sessions on what a real planetary “habitability zone” involves. A bit more, let’s say, than two-inch type about billions of “habitable” planets.

Comments
So citing a a fairly contestable figure for how large this universe is provides support for the multiverse??? Oh,, I see who made the comment,,, someone who believes designed computer algorithms provide support for Darwinism! Never mind then.bornagain77
July 15, 2013
July
07
Jul
15
15
2013
04:44 AM
4
04
44
AM
PDT
Elizabeth I have to concur, we have not observed the edge of our universe yet that much is true but to speculate that there are an infinite number of these is just fantasy. Nobody knows and you can bring a million mathematical models none of them make it true. Unless these universes are observed its not science.Andre
July 15, 2013
July
07
Jul
15
15
2013
04:40 AM
4
04
40
AM
PDT
"Estimates are that the universe is 10^23 larger than the part we can observe." Wow!! Isn't it amazing what an explosion amidst nothingness can achieve? ;)PeterJ
July 15, 2013
July
07
Jul
15
15
2013
04:33 AM
4
04
33
AM
PDT
I'm curious: do people who say that the "multiverse" has no evidence to support it, nonetheless agree that our observable universe must be a tiny fraction of the whole? Estimates are that the universe is 10^23 larger than the part we can observe. Does anyone here have a problem with this estimate?Elizabeth B Liddle
July 15, 2013
July
07
Jul
15
15
2013
04:06 AM
4
04
06
AM
PDT
News: Each of those, just on basic professional ethics, should have refused to serve on a panel as judges. This is why I would rather be tried by twelve plain ordinary folks, good and true, taken at random from the phone book, than by a faculty railroading committee in those indoctrination centres formerly known as universities. KFkairosfocus
July 15, 2013
July
07
Jul
15
15
2013
03:34 AM
3
03
34
AM
PDT
Actuall, Axel, that is what pop science writers often sound like when writing about it. It holds more attractions for them than one might at first suppose. - O'LearyNews
July 15, 2013
July
07
Jul
15
15
2013
02:23 AM
2
02
23
AM
PDT
I can't help but wonder... who saw this multiverse?Andre
July 15, 2013
July
07
Jul
15
15
2013
01:57 AM
1
01
57
AM
PDT
The multiverse ..... the only serious alternative? A (multi)phenomenon(!) which would, at a stroke, nullify all intelligibility, and knowledge, science in its pristine meaning; its very antithesis?Axel
July 15, 2013
July
07
Jul
15
15
2013
01:23 AM
1
01
23
AM
PDT
1 2 3

Leave a Reply