Biology Darwinism

He said it: As a butcher eyes a sheep, so the Darwinists eyed paleontologist Steve Gould (1941-2002)?

Spread the love

David Berlinski recalls Gould’s tetchy relationship with the iron rice bowls of the Darwin establishment:

Of course, if the fossil record does not fit the theory, it is always possible to adjust the theory to fit the record. In science, an enterprising theoretician has several degrees of freedom within which to maneuver before the referee reaches ten and the final bell comes to clang. Steven Jay Gould, who was trained as a paleontologist, surveyed the fossil evidence early in the 1970s and came to the obvious conclusion that either the theory or the evidence must go.

What went, on his scheme of things, was the neo Darwinian orthodoxy by which species change into different species by means of an endless series of infinitesimal changes, continuously, like the flow of syrup. Instead, Gould argued, biological change must have been discontinuous, with vast changes taking place at once. Such was his model of punctuated equilibria.

It fits the fossil record far better (if it makes sense, even, to talk of scientific fit here), but the model achieves faithfulness to the facts only by chucking out the chief concepts of the Darwinian theory itself, and while paleontologists have been glad to have had Gould’s company, evolutionary theorists have looked over what he has written with the cool, slitted, appraising glance of a butcher eyeing a sheep.

– David Berlinski, “The Evidence for Evolution,” in Black Mischief: Language, Life, Logic, Luck,” Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: Boston MA, Second Edition, 1988, pp. 300-302.

My impression is that Gould thought at first that revealing the facts of Darwinism’s failures (the trade secret of paleontology) would just be a lark. He soon learned otherwise, and ended up capitulating to the Darwinists in public while doubting in private. A friend told me he would not likely have signed the Steves list (Darwin lobby’s list of loyalist guys named Steve).

Well, he’s dead now, and we’ll never know, but I sense a story, and it would be interesting to hear more.

(Note: Here is an instance of Wiki Answers forced to admit, however evasively, that there was a serious issue there.)

2 Replies to “He said it: As a butcher eyes a sheep, so the Darwinists eyed paleontologist Steve Gould (1941-2002)?

  1. 1
    Heinrich says:

    What went, on his scheme of things, was the neo Darwinian orthodoxy by which species change into different species by means of an endless series of infinitesimal changes, continuously, like the flow of syrup. Instead, Gould argued, biological change must have been discontinuous, with vast changes taking place at once

    Gould was also happy to acknowledge that the amount of continuous change that we see occurring (e.g. in Darwin’s Finches) could easily explain the apparent discontinuous changes we see in the fossil record. The time scales are just so different.

    (BTW, that second answer at wiki answers looks like it’s written by a creationist: who else would write about “fellow believers in evolution”?)

  2. 2
    Robert Byers says:

    The only relevant thing about this Gould guy on origin issues is that he in a minor, minor, minor way corrected a pregnant problem. The fossil record ain’t much of a record of a bug to a buffalo.
    So it must, must, must, be that there are sudden leaps of change and this later has documentation in the fossil record. Yeah thats it.

    Of coarse this still demands the geology is accurate that there is a sequence of time.
    This biology subject is founded on geological strata.
    Yec folks like to point this out.

Leave a Reply