Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Off topic: Why Canada is less violent … except sometimes

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

A while back, and I cannot find it now, a commenter expressed the view that Canada is less violent than the United States because we have more atheists here.

Sounded wrong to me. First, Canada is not always less violent. It depends on what you count.

If anyone thinks they can just murder a public servant in the course of his/her duties, for essentially religious reasons, and have it classed as routine “workplace violence,” Canada is definitely the wrong country to pick.

We have never seen things that way, and most of us hope we never will.

It doesn’t mean we are anti-religious: From our Charter of Rights and Freedoms:

Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law.

I (born citizen) was one of the witnesses abruptly summoned to the Constitution Committee hearings, in Ottawa in 1981. All that said and forgotten, here are some useful things to know:

1. The original Canadians were people who either refused to take part in the American Revolution or were living in the United States but fled, to avoid getting involved. Not all were white. Many were Native Americans or African Americans, worried about how the Founders would treat them.

This was not out of cowardice. Canadians have performed very well in military engagements. We simply did not believe that the proper response to George III was a revolution. We reckoned we could outlive him.

2. Canada also had the historical advantage that the American Revolution apprised the British that they could not just deal peremptorily with the “colonials” any more. So by the time Canadians became seriously unhappy (Rebellions of 1837), the British sent out toffs instead of redcoats, to find out why we were so unhappy. Then they started pressuring us to become more independent. By 1867, Queen Victoria was choosing us a national capital (Ottawa) over tea.

3. Because we don’t really have a history of violence, we usually don’t try solving problems that way (please, I am NOT talking about some guy murdering a public servant in the course of his duties. We call that: Getting to the top of our In tray, and we deal with it promptly).

I mean, in general, if there is a lot of violence somewhere in our own territory, we would historically prefer to send out a police force (the Mounties, for example) to just start enforcing the Criminal Code. Not a cavalry, you understand, but a police force.

4. We have not tended to be in wars we have lost. So that means older Canadians like me are not full of resentment and rage. We like new immigrants. But we think it will help them adjust if they know a little about the country.

At least, it helps them go to sleep at night because the most likely way they would die is boredom or exposure to cold, not violence from their neighbours.

* I did not live in Ottawa then. I never even ate a meal here at the time, so I had no “expenses” to declare, when asked by the Committee, at the time. Air travel in those days was so free and easy that I was even on the wrong flight as well, but no one cared. After all, it was just the usual run between Toronto and Ottawa. Everybody was a Canadian or else wanted to be one, or maybe wanted us to do something for them. So, the flight attendant simply said, take a seat, and marked up my papers accordingly. This was long before terrorism took hold, of course.

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Comments
Whoever pays for that is crazy. One thing that is - I hope - gaining a lot of traction is community policing. It is best done informally. Here is an example from my own experience: Some homeowners I knew of encountered a biohazard: Used syringes in their back yard. (heroin, of course) So what the police officers did was, they went door to door in the neighbourhood informing "everyone" of the dangers of accidentally inappropriate disposal of syringes. There was only one person they were really trying to reach and they knew who it was. But they couldn't "prove" it. However, that person went and got medical help when they heard that everyone was being informed of this problem and was watching out for it.News
October 26, 2014
October
10
Oct
26
26
2014
06:15 AM
6
06
15
AM
PDT
'I mean, in general, if there is a lot of violence somewhere in our own territory, we would historically prefer to send out a police force (the Mounties, for example) to just start enforcing the Criminal Code. Not a cavalry, you understand, but a police force.' Some of the caper that goes on in the US today is literally (sic) surreal, and I don't doubt some Americans are as acutely aware of it as anyone. The most unbelievable, to my mind, was their sending in a fully-accoutred SWAT team to a barber's shop, because it was suspected that his barber's licence had expired!!!!! Then, the other day, I remembered that barber-shop scene in one of the classic, Leone, Spaghetti westerns, and wondered whether the poor, aforesaid barber thought he'd perhaps somehow wandered onto the set of that film, when Monco (or was it the County Killer?) spins round in his barber's chair and shoots all four or five the baddies within the space of a second or two - with unerring accuracy, of course! No, I couldn't imagine that happening in Canada, Denyse. Incidentally, I've read posts of Americans suggesting maybe it wasn't such a good idea revolting against the Brits, judging from Canada relative sanity.Axel
October 26, 2014
October
10
Oct
26
26
2014
05:26 AM
5
05
26
AM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply