Mind
Oxytocin, love drug, turns out not to be
Deprogramming “neuro”politics in an election year
We must pretend there is free will so as to go on using the language of ethics?
Consciousness: Neuroscientist David Eagleman sort of starts to get the picture
Is the search for the origin of human intelligence really a discipline in science?
Materialist neuroscientist admits that his stance is a “leap of faith”
A materialist account of the human mind that allows for free will?
How’s that materialist project going again?
No one should pay a cent for a theory of consciousness, let alone a review of it
New York Times piece: “There’s not a grain of real science in it that’s worth putting on the front page”
Trying to make a machine into a human isn’t really new, it turns out
Memo from materialists: Science is over. Oh and, by the way, consciousness doesn’t matter
Q: Is Logic simply a matter of axioms at play in an abstract logical world unconnected to external reality? A: Nope
As we continue to look at the issue of first principles of right reason, one of the key steps being taken by critics of the Law of Non-Contradiction [LNC] is to assert that we are here dealing with axioms unconnected to the real world, at least in relevant cases.
First, let us clip a recent comment to refresh our recollection of the why behind the classical laws of thought, which can here be seen as self-evident and thus “natural,” rather than arbitrary projections unto reality conditioned by genes and memes: Read More ›