Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

But are human groups “extinct” if their genes live on in us?

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

From the New York Times, we learn:

Ancestors of Modern Humans Interbred With Extinct Hominins, Study Finds

The ancestors of modern humans interbred with Neanderthals and another extinct line of humans known as the Denisovans at least four times in the course of prehistory, according to an analysis of global genomes published Thursday in the journal Science.

The interbreeding may have given modern humans genes that bolstered immunity to pathogens, the authors concluded.

“This is yet another genetic nail in the coffin of our oversimplistic models of human evolution,” said Carles Lalueza-Fox, a research scientist at the Institute of Evolutionary Biology in Barcelona, Spain, who was not involved in the study.

The new study expands on a series of findings in recent years showing that the ancestors of modern humans once shared the planet with a surprising number of near relatives — lineages like the Neanderthals and Denisovans that became extinct tens of thousands of years ago. More.

So we know they were separate species because … ? Someone just decided it? Someone needed it for ideological reasons?

Someday someone is going to start asking these questions.

See also: “Extinct” human group Denisovans’ genes found in Oceania peoples

and

“Speciation” means what exactly? No one can define it but it is the basis of Darwinian evolution.

Comments
And just found this for evidence to go with what goodusername said in comment #2:
Denisovan or Denisova hominin is an extinct species of human in the genus Homo. The species is sometimes given the name Homo sp. Altai, and Homo sapiens ssp. Denisova.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denisovan
Scientific name: Homo neanderthalensis Higher classification: Humans Extinction status: Extinct Rank: Species
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NeanderthalGaryGaulin
March 26, 2016
March
03
Mar
26
26
2016
04:57 PM
4
04
57
PM
PDT
But are human groups “extinct” if their genes live on in us?
They in part live on but the rest of their human lineage became “extinct”, no longer around to interbreed.GaryGaulin
March 26, 2016
March
03
Mar
26
26
2016
04:38 PM
4
04
38
PM
PDT
Someday someone is going to start asking these questions.
As has been pointed out many times by others, if you think people - many people - haven't been asking such questions and addressing the "species" issue, than you haven't been paying attention. It's been one of the most debated and discussed subjects in biology for the past 300 years.
So we know they were separate species because … ?
Actually, the article no where claims that Neanderthals or Denisovans are separate species. (And, no, using the term "extinction" doesn't imply such. The term is also used for groups within species.)goodusername
March 26, 2016
March
03
Mar
26
26
2016
04:15 PM
4
04
15
PM
PDT
The concept of a species is man made. For extant animals, there are many different species that can interbreed (eg. Tigers and lions, dogs, coyotes and wolves, Grizzlies and Polar bears, etc.). The distinct species chatagorizationd are maintained for historical convenience. For fossils, it is even more confusing.Indiana Effigy
March 26, 2016
March
03
Mar
26
26
2016
02:10 PM
2
02
10
PM
PDT

Leave a Reply