Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Coffee!! A rather different take on Darwinism in the schools

arroba Email

John Taylor Gatto, a veteran teacher who is “against school ” discusses an old book about education and its hair-curling ideas:

It was from James Bryant Conant – president of Harvard for twenty years, WWI poison-gas specialist, WWII executive on the atomic-bomb project, high commissioner of the American zone in Germany after WWII, and truly one of the most influential figures of the twentieth century – that I first got wind of the real purposes of American schooling. Without Conant, we would probably not have the same style and degree of standardized testing that we enjoy today, nor would we be blessed with gargantuan high schools that warehouse 2,000 to 4,000 students at a time, like the famous Columbine High in Littleton, Colorado. Shortly after I retired from teaching I picked up Conant’s 1959 book-length essay, The Child the Parent and the State, and was more than a little intrigued to see him mention in passing that the modern schools we attend were the result of a “revolution” engineered between 1905 and 1930. A revolution? He declines to elaborate, but he does direct the curious and the uninformed to Alexander Inglis’s 1918 book, Principles of Secondary Education, in which “one saw this revolution through the eyes of a revolutionary.”

, among which ideas are,

5) The selective function. This refers not to human choice at all but to Darwin’s theory of natural selection as applied to what he called “the favored races.” In short, the idea is to help things along by consciously attempting to improve the breeding stock. Schools are meant to tag the unfit – with poor grades, remedial placement, and other punishments – clearly enough that their peers will accept them as inferior and effectively bar them from the reproductive sweepstakes. That’s what all those little humiliations from first grade onward were intended to do: wash the dirt down the drain.[ … ]

That, unfortunately, is the purpose of mandatory public education in this country. And lest you take Inglis for an isolated crank with a rather too cynical take on the educational enterprise, you should know that he was hardly alone in championing these ideas.

No, I know for a fact he wasn’t alone. Many of the ideas have fallen by the wayside, but I remember the teacher practise of singling out slow learners for ridicule. The worst part is that this didn’t come from personal vindictiveness; the teachers were encouraged and taught to do it.

Moderator/Administrator please read I have been defending ID on Mathgrrl's congratulatory blog for more than 10 days. Another ID supporter came over to help me for a while but I'm there mostly alone.Here is the blog page http://mfinmoderation.wordpress.com/2011/03/14/mathgrrls-csi-thread/#comment-1340 Why am I in moderation? Please let me know on epesic@gmail.com Thanks Eugen Pesic Burlington,Ontario Eugen

Leave a Reply