Education Intelligent Design science education

Husband of new US education secretary once promo’d ID in schools?

Spread the love

First: So? From Rebecca Klein at Huffington Post:

While running for governor of Michigan in 2006, Dick DeVos ― whose wife, Betsy, is now President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for U.S. secretary of education ― said that schools should have the option of teaching intelligent design alongside evolution.

To be sure, DeVos’ comments were made 10 years ago, and his wife has given no indication that she’d like to use her position in the Trump administration to promote intelligent design in schools. But Dick DeVos’ views on religion and education run parallel to his wife’s in many areas, and the couple’s family foundation has made donations that critics say have enabled the encroachment of religious education in the public sphere. More.

Oh? Maybe Dick could be a consultant to the NASA program, started under the outgoing administration, in which:

just a few days prior to our meeting, NASA’s Astrobiology Program—headed by Mary Voytek—awarded $1.108 million (5% of its annual budget) to the Center of Theological Inquiry, a religious think tank with more than $23 million in assets, to investigate how the world’s religions might respond to the discovery of life on other planets. John Templeton Foundation is co-sponsoring the two-year project (2015-2017) with a $1.7 million grant to CTI. (pp. 87–88, Suzan Mazur’s Public Evolution Summit

A far likelier bitchfest will turn out to be that Betsy is a strong advocate of charter schools.

School choice advocates say increased federal control over education policy is unacceptable. They point to wide disparities in test scores between white and non-white students as proof that urgent action is required to ensure that all students are receiving a quality education. As a result, school choice is becoming an increasingly bipartisan issue.

A good guess: Non-white children do more poorly because they are more likely to live in places dominated by government interventions to “help” people – help them, that is, to do everything except not to need government employees “helping” them. Which brings me to my second point:

Chill breeze from up north: Good for DeVos.

Just about any non-criminal development in U.S education would be a refreshing change. No, really! Achievement for dollar value is worse in the United States than in most Western countries, probably because of the unrelenting involvement of their federal government in creating vast multi-layer, overlapping bureaucracies and senseless jumbles of rules.

The rest of the developed world spends way less and gets much more, simply because we limit the number of shovels in the hole at any given time or place…

Tax-enabled mediocrities are doubtless shocked by it all. And they can use “teaching ID in the schools,” horrors!, to fire up their base.

If they were closer to being any kind of answer to the problem, the educrats would be dancing in the streets at the prospect that students could actually understand any ID concepts (information theory, anyone?) As opposed to “Five reasons not to blow your mind on drugs, Unit 4.” (= And big government paid how many million for that twaddle? )

ID fans: The US educrat system is a classic violation of the rule of subsidiarity in decision-making: Decisions should happen at the lowest effective level. = If Johnny can’t read, it is first and foremost his parents’ and his teachers’ problem; it must be addressed there, not in the Senate.

But ID is the least of the mediocrities’ problems – except when they need to fundraise with their base.

See also: My review of a film about a struggle for a charter school, Won’t Back Down.

The scene that made the strongest impression on me was teacher Nona Alberts explaining to a heady but fearful school reform gathering that the folk who build prisons study the huge dropout rate at Adams and similar schools, to decide how many cells to build. According to government statistics, one in every 32 Americans is “either in prison or on parole from prison.” Schools like Adams are feeder schools for prison, not for universities, and nothing will change, absent an honest national discussion of that fact.

Follow UD News at Twitter!

6 Replies to “Husband of new US education secretary once promo’d ID in schools?

  1. 1
    Silver Asiatic says:

    When thinking about American schools, or America in general, and comparing with other countries (as people have been doing lately with Cuba, for example), something to consider here:

    Buffalo NY Schools Challenged with More than 85 different languages spoken throughout the district
    http://buffalonews.com/2016/11.....istration/

    It’s easy to forget that the US is the third most populated country on earth with over 310 million people (compared with 11 million in Cuba, for example, or 35 million in Canada). Subsidiarity and charter schools does seem to be the answer. Catholics, at one time, had a considerable network of parochial schools also which helped in days gone by.

    America changed from a melting-pot to a mosaic (the concept which we probably borrowed from our neighbors to the north) so the government will generally adjust to every culture that arrives here rather than expect the immigrant to conform to “American cultural norms” – and nobody knows what those are anyway. As it seems, American culture is becoming some sort of atheist-materialist-secular thing, and the schools reflect that.

    The kids suffer ultimately in this case.

  2. 2
    kairosfocus says:

    News:

    Oh, the horror, the horror, somebody might tell children in America that Sir Francis Crick identified that text is in the heart of the living cell.

    Worse, they might — shudder — say that large quantities of text expressing machine code and linked information processing machinery (here built with molecular nanotech) raise the question that intelligently directed configuration — the ONLY actually empirically warranted source of functionally specific complex organisation and associated information — might account for certain key features of the natural world such as life. Horrors!

    (What does such a reaction by the radical secularists tell us about their view of the world and what they think about truth and the souls of our children? Maybe, the same that the ghosts of 800+ million unborn victims of abortion over the past 40-odd years are trying to tell us?)

    For shame!

    KF

  3. 3
    Silver Asiatic says:

    Radical secularists impose their worldview on the schools and on the culture as a whole. Obviously that worldview is imposed on science.

    The strange thing is that ID is a totally secular, non-religious theory and it should be permitted in schools.

  4. 4
    News says:

    Silver Asiatic and kairosfocus, all fair, but remember that Canadian schools do better than American ones on less money. Canada is multicultural too.

    But we butted the federal government out of education back in 1867, at Confederation.

    So the Biggest Boot doesn’t land on local systems very often.

    It’s not a recipe for success; just a reduced risk of failure.

    Our problems are in principle fixable.

  5. 5

    SA @ 3: Well said. I am amazed that atheists/materialists still attach ID with specific religions, mostly Christianity which they seem to hate more than any other.

    In fact, ID is absolutely silent on who or what the Designer is. Those are philosophical worldview questions beyond the reach of ID (and science generally).

  6. 6
    Dean_from_Ohio says:

    Diversity is as diversity does. But when diversity is only a wrecking ball to tear down society, as it is used by the Progressives, it isn’t diversity at all. People who have a different skin color offer only marginal benefit to a group as bearers of a different skin color; it is the difference in thought that can, when united by something larger than their differences, can bring strength. But that is precisely what is banned by Progressives. It’s their way, or nothing. They are at war with us. They cannot be persuaded; they can only be defeated.

    Progressivism poisons everything.

Leave a Reply