Climate change Education Intelligent Design Science

What Bill Nye is doing now

Spread the love
Bill MFS thumbnail

Language warning

It’s not clear why people who behave this way expect their causes to be taken seriously.

It’s interesting where people end up. Does anyone remember the “Ham on Nye” series? It was at least a respectable examination of evidence.

UD News’ take on Bill Nye is that he was a schoolroom celeb but didn’t really age into a science guru for adults.

See also: Bill Nye’s Knowledge Of Science Could Benefit From A Visit To Wikipedia (Barry Arrington) (And yes, even Wikipedia!)

These Vids Certainly Show A Different Side To Bill Nye…

and

Goes Around, Comes Around: 500 Women Scientists Are Eating Bill Nye…

Follow UD News at Twitter!

9 Replies to “What Bill Nye is doing now

  1. 1
    AaronS1978 says:

    OK somebody’s got to be thinking this

    Bill Nye the science guy bill Bill bill Bill bill Bill bill Bill bill Bill bill Bill bill Nye the science!
    :p

  2. 2
    Brother Brian says:

    I was never a Bill Nye fan but this video made me laugh. It would be like Mr. Rodgers breaking down and dropping several F-bombs while he ranted about how much he hated kids.

  3. 3
    Bob O'H says:

    I think the context of the video is important to understand the swearing. It’s from a piece by John Oliver about the Green New Deal, linking it to the recent IPCC and IPBES reports, which are basically saying that we’re fudging up the planet(*). Nye’s swearing is to drive home the point about the seriousness of the problem, in a humorous way.

    (*) only they didn’t say “fudging”

  4. 4
    forexhr says:

    Bill Nye is one of those who fail to understand that although evolution, i.e. process of evolution, is a fact, this process is totally powerless in creating higher life forms, as required by the theory of evolution. Higher life forms are characterized by novel proteins, organs, molecular machines, and body plans, that were nonexistent in the lower life forms, such as first self-replicating cells. The theory of evolution holds that the above mentioned process was able to repeatedly produce such novelty in a short period of time. Namely, according to the theory, at the beginning of the Cambrian period, in an interval of 20 million years or less, the process of evolution resulted in the explosion of animal diversity with multiple feats of anatomical and physiological novelty. In an evolutionary blink of an eye, most major animal phyla were fully developed. Recently, the “big bang” of bird evolution has been mapped, revealing that almost all of the modern groups of birds evolved in a small window of less than 10 million years. So evolution must have happened extremely fast and produced novelty in a short period of time. Finally, based on 53-million-year-old fossils of whale-like, semi-aquatic mammals, scientists had thought mammals gave rise to whales in a process that took 15 million years. The new find suggests it took just 4 million years. So again, in an evolutionary blink of an eye the evolution process must have produced a lot of novelty to turn a terrestrial mammal to a fully aquatic marine mammal.

    However, the observation clearly shows the complete powerlessness of this process. For e.g. in the last 300,000 years, the variation part of the evolution process produced more than 100 billion different Homo sapiens genomes. But has this enormous diversity caused humans to start to develop some new, distinct organs, molecular machines, or body plans that will occupy ecological niches humans previously could not occupy, i.e. enable the selection part of the evolution process to act on them? Well, obviously not. After an enormous number of different genomes produced, humans are anatomically, morphologically and physiologically practically identical, without any traces of new structures starting to develop. The same is true for the E.coli long-term evolution experiment, which is the longest running microbial evolution experiment. After more than 67,000 generations of E. coli, which is the equivalent to over one million years of human evolution, not a single, new and distinct structure was created. Most of the changes involved streamlining the genome, deleting genes no longer needed, or reducing protein expression, with one change being the breaking of a repressor switch which caused preexisting citrate-uptake pathway to turn on. So, both humans and E.coli have undergone a lot of evolution, but nothing structurally new was created. This clearly shows that the fact of evolution has nothing to do with the validity of the evolution theory. The evolution process is indeed factual the same as other natural processes, be it: fog, thunder, tornadoes, decomposition, wave propagation, erosion, etc. But natural processes, including evolution, are totally powerless in creating new functional things. Many educated people, like Bill Nye, fail to differentiate between evolution process (fact) and evolution theory (human idea about what the evolution process can and cannot do), which is why they hold irrational beliefs about the enormous creation powers of a mere natural process that is in reality totally powerless.

  5. 5
    bornagain77 says:

    Nye should instead be upset that he is being systematically lied to:

    The Biggest Lie Ever Told – Man-made Global Warming – Mar 29, 2019
    Carbon Dioxide Only Causes Climate Change in UN IPCC Climate Models
    Excerpt: Today’s climate change is well within the range of natural climate variability through Earth’s 4.5 billion-year history. In fact, it is within the range of the climate change of the last 10,000 years, a period known as the Holocene, 95% of which was warmer than today. Indeed, it is now cooler than the Holocene Optimum, which spanned a period from about 9,000 to 5,000 years ago. The Optimum was named at a time when warming was understood to be a good thing in contrast to the miserable cold times that periodically cripple mankind. A small group fooled the world into believing that warming is bad and that today’s weather is warmer than ever before, all caused by the human addition of a relatively trivial amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere. It is the biggest lie ever told, and that reason alone caused many to believe.
    The lie began with the assumption that an increase in CO2 would cause an increase in temperature. In the historical record, temperature increases before CO2, so the benign gas is not causing temperature rise. Indeed, it cannot cause global warming or climate change. The only place where a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase is in the computer models promoted by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). This is the main reason why the model predictions are always wrong.,,,
    Some of the small lies used to perpetuate the big lie include:
    It is warmer now than ever before.
    There is more severe weather now than ever before.
    CO2 levels are the highest ever.
    Arctic and Antarctic sea ice levels are the lowest ever.
    Extinction rates are the highest ever.
    Polar bear populations are in serious decline.
    Sea levels are rising at an increasing rate.,,,
    The Trump administration has proposed to establish a Presidential Commission on Climate Security, headed by former Princeton physicist Will Happer, to expose the climate lie by disclosing how the IPCC only examined human causes of climate change. They will show how natural climate change completely overwhelms any human effect. For example, human production of CO2 is less than the uncertainty in the measurement of the transfer of CO2 from two natural sources: the oceans, and vegetation and land. In other words, if we removed all the people from the planet, a scientist left behind to measure the CO2 levels would not detect any difference.
    https://americaoutloud.com/the-biggest-lie-ever-told-man-made-global-warming/

    Shoot, atheists can’t even explain why we have a remarkably stable orbit, much less why the climate is remarkably fit for advanced life such as ourselves:

    Is the Solar System Stable? By Scott Tremaine – 2011
    Excerpt: So what are the results? Most of the calculations agree that eight billion years from now, just before the Sun swallows the inner planets and incinerates the outer ones, all of the planets will still be in orbits very similar to their present ones. In this limited sense, the solar system is stable. However, a closer look at the orbit histories reveals that the story is more nuanced. After a few tens of millions of years, calculations using slightly different parameters (e.g., different planetary masses or initial positions within the small ranges allowed by current observations) or different numerical algorithms begin to diverge at an alarming rate. More precisely, the growth of small differences changes from linear to exponential:,,,
    As an example, shifting your pencil from one side of your desk to the other today could change the gravitational forces on Jupiter enough to shift its position from one side of the Sun to the other a billion years from now. The unpredictability of the solar system over very long times is of course ironic since this was the prototypical system that inspired Laplacian determinism.
    Fortunately, most of this unpredictability is in the orbital phases of the planets, not the shapes and sizes of their orbits, so the chaotic nature of the solar system does not normally lead to collisions between planets. However, the presence of chaos implies that we can only study the long-term fate of the solar system in a statistical sense, by launching in our computers an armada of solar systems with slightly different parameters at the present time—typically, each planet is shifted by a random amount of about a millimeter—and following their evolution. When this is done, it turns out that in about 1 percent of these systems, Mercury’s orbit becomes sufficiently eccentric so that it collides with Venus before the death of the Sun. Thus, the answer to the question of the stability of the solar system—more precisely, will all the planets survive until the death of the Sun—is neither “yes” nor “no” but “yes, with 99 percent probability.”
    https://www.ias.edu/about/publications/ias-letter/articles/2011-summer/solar-system-tremaine

    Research now establishes that every planet in our solar system must possess exactly the masses and orbits that they do for advanced life to be possible on Earth. No other known planetary system comes anywhere close to having the features to make advanced life possible. We live not only on a miraculously “rare” Earth but also a miraculously “rare” planetary system. For details and documentation, see my latest blog post. – Hugh Ross – June 2017
    per reasons.org

    Life and Earth History Reveal God’s Miraculous Preparation for Humans – Hugh Ross, PhD – video (2014)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2Y496NYnm8

    Anthropic Principle: A Precise Plan for Humanity By Hugh Ross
    Excerpt: Brandon Carter, the British mathematician who coined the term “anthropic principle” (1974), noted the strange inequity of a universe that spends about 15 billion years “preparing” for the existence of a creature that has the potential to survive no more than 10 million years (optimistically).,, Carter and (later) astrophysicists John Barrow and Frank Tipler demonstrated that the inequality exists for virtually any conceivable intelligent species under any conceivable life-support conditions. Roughly 15 billion years represents a minimum preparation time for advanced life: 11 billion toward formation of a stable planetary system, one with the right chemical and physical conditions for primitive life, and four billion more years toward preparation of a planet within that system, one richly layered with the biodeposits necessary for civilized intelligent life. Even this long time and convergence of “just right” conditions reflect miraculous efficiency.
    http://christiangodblog.blogsp.....chive.html

    The Place of Life and Man in Nature: Defending the Anthropocentric Thesis – Michael J. Denton – February 25, 2013
    Excerpt page 6: Water
    The fitness of the thermal properties of water for life were first discussed by Whewell in his Bridgewater Treatise [47], and later touched on by Wallace [2: ch. 7]. In The Fitness, Henderson pointed out that water’s high thermal capacity assists in the maintenance of a constant body temperature in warm-blooded organisms [3: p. 89], while its high evaporative cooling greatly assists terrestrial warm-blooded organisms in losing heat when the ambient temperature approaches 38°C. As he put it:
    “In an animal like man, whose metabolism is very intense, heat is a most prominent excretory product, which has constantly to be eliminated in great amounts, and to this end only three important means are available: conduction, radiation and the evaporation of water … At a low temperature there is little evaporation of water, but at body temperature or above there can be no loss of heat at all by conduction and radiation, and the whole burden is therefore thrown on evaporation. [3: p. 102;]”,,,
    Summary (page 11)
    Many of the properties of the key members of Henderson’s vital ensemble —water, oxygen, CO2, HCO3 —are in several instances fit specifically for warm-blooded, air-breathing organisms such as ourselves. These include the thermal properties of water, its low viscosity, the gaseous nature of oxygen and CO2 at ambient temperatures, the inertness of oxygen at ambient temperatures, and the bicarbonate buffer, with its anomalous pKa value and the elegant means of acid-base regulation it provides for air-breathing organisms. Some of their properties are irrelevant to other classes of organisms or even maladaptive.
    It is very hard to believe there could be a similar suite of fitness for advanced carbon-based life forms. If carbon-based life is all there is, as seems likely, then the design of any active complex terrestrial being would have to closely resemble our own. Indeed the suite of properties of water, oxygen, and CO2 together impose such severe constraints on the design and functioning of the respiratory and cardiovascular systems that their design, even down to the details of capillary and alveolar structure can be inferred from first principles. For complex beings of high metabolic rate, the designs actualized in complex Terran forms are all that can be. There are no alternative physiological designs in the domain of carbon-based life that can achieve the high metabolic activity manifest in man and other higher organisms.
    http://bio-complexity.org/ojs/.....O-C.2013.1

    Privileged Species – video (2015) (13:29 minute mark; water’s thermal properties, 15:00 minute mark; evaporative cooling is optimal for humans in particular)
    https://youtu.be/VoI2ms5UHWg
    Opening remark in the video by Bill Nye: “I am just another speck of sand”

    No you are not Billy boy. You have far more significance in this universe than you realize in your atheistic worldview.

    Atheistic Materialism vs Meaning, Value, and Purpose in Our Lives – video
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqUxBSbFhog

  6. 6
    asauber says:

    “the seriousness of the problem, in a humorous way”

    Yes Bob O’H, what a sad joke this is. You nailed it.

    Andrew

  7. 7
    Marfin says:

    Who knew that all a Bond villain had to to to control the worlds weather was to drive a diesel car and light coal fire .The fact is ask any climate scientist to guarantee that there will not be another ice age anytime soon they cannot ,so maybe us heating up a planet a little might just help us survive that impending doom , ha ha.
    Climate change is real its causes are so multi faceted to think we can prevent it is just a joke and to think that scientist know exactly what the future holds in relation to future change is another big joke , this is not science its money and attention grabbing hysteria.

  8. 8
    asauber says:

    “this is not science its money and attention grabbing hysteria”

    And of course Bob O’H is defending it, predictably, on cue, and without shame. lol

    Andrew

  9. 9
    Trumper says:

    Bill Nye…. the goofy guy…. nothing more funny and scary than Bill Nye. This Halloween I think i’ll work up a short YouTube clip of the three scariest clowns out there being frightened by each other…yes that is right, Pennywise the clown getting terrified by the other two, Gore and Nye and their antics.

Leave a Reply