Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

No ID, No Funding

William Dembski
August 1, 2006
Darwinism, Evolution, Intelligent Design
1
Categories
Darwinism
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

This article (http://www.the-scientist.com/article/daily/23793) presents the ongoing controversy over whether an evolutionist presented “adequate justification for the assumption in the proposal that the theory of evolution, and not intelligent design theory, was correct” . . .  in his grant proposal!

Comments
#4, I wonder if it's even available with a subscription or if they've buried it altogether.russ
August 1, 2006
August
08
Aug
1
01
2006
06:45 PM
6
06
45
PM
PDT
Yesterday it was free access, today they are asking for money. Maybe they are trying to raise money for their research, or maybe they are trying to stop us leaving comments. Who knows? No $ no look.idnet.com.au
August 1, 2006
August
08
Aug
1
01
2006
04:20 PM
4
04
20
PM
PDT
Apparently, the article (now?) requires a subscription.russ
August 1, 2006
August
08
Aug
1
01
2006
01:42 PM
1
01
42
PM
PDT
Great article. And could it be that the sacred cow of peer review is starting to swing both ways? The article goes on to say: "Scientists say the rejection letter aroused such interest because a four-person peer-review committee composed it and the SSHRC reviewed it." In any event, given what happened to Sternberg, it'd be interesting to follow the fate of these reviewers since the SSHRC is "looking into its peer-review process because of the controversy."SteveB
August 1, 2006
August
08
Aug
1
01
2006
06:21 AM
6
06
21
AM
PDT
Or as a Chinese laundryman would say, "no ID, no money." (originally was, "no tickee, no washee"). "No ID, no fundee" sounds too ambiguous. LOLLarry Fafarman
August 1, 2006
August
08
Aug
1
01
2006
01:25 AM
1
01
25
AM
PDT

Leave a Reply