Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Not With Our Tax Dollars You Don’t!

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

For IMMEDIATE RELEASE on October 12, 2005

Contact: Larry Caldwell
Phone: 916-774-4667
lcaldwell@qsea.org

Lawsuit Alleges that Federally-Funded Evolution Website Violates Separation of Church and State by Using Religion to Promote Evolution

San Francisco, CA— A California parent, Jeanne Caldwell, is filing a federal lawsuit today against officials of the National Science Foundation and the University of California at Berkeley for spending more than $500,000 of federal money on a website that encourages teachers to use religion to promote evolution in violation of the First Amendment.

Blind Leading the Blind

“In this stunning example of hypocrisy, the same people who so loudly proclaim that they oppose discussion of religion in science classes are clamoring for public school teachers to expressly use theology in order to convince students to support evolution,” said Larry Caldwell, President of Quality Science Education for All, who is co-counsel in the suit with the Pacific Justice Institute.

Called “Understanding Evolution,” the website identified in the lawsuit directs teachers to doctrinal statements by seventeen religious denominations and groups endorsing evolutionary theory. A statement by the United Church of Christ, for example, declares that evolution is consistent with “the revelation and presence of… God in Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit.”

The website further suggests classroom activities that explicitly use religion to promote evolution. In one suggested activity, teachers are supposed to share with students statements by religious leaders on evolution, but only those “stress[ing] the compatibility of theology with the science of evolution.” In another activity, students are assigned to interview ministers about their views on evolution, with the purpose of showing students that “Evolution is OK!” Teachers are cautioned, however, that this particular activity may not work if they live in a community that is “conservative Christian.”

“While the government has a legitimate purpose in educating students about the science of evolution, it’s outrageous that tax dollars would be spent to indoctrinate students into a particular religious view of evolution. There are many different religious views about evolution. How dare the government tell students which religious view is correct!” said plaintiff Jeanne Caldwell. “This is propaganda, not education.”

The lawsuit alleges that the state and federal government are promoting religious beliefs to minor school children through the website in violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The suit seeks injunctive relief to remove these government endorsed religious beliefs from the website.

The lawsuit also alleges that the website is being used to further the religious agenda of a private organization, the National Center for Science Education (NSCE), which has a “long history of religious advocacy” on the evolution issue. According to the suit, the NCSE, which helped design the website, provides religious “outreach” programs and “preaching” on evolution to churches, all aimed at convincing people of faith that there is no conflict between their religious beliefs and evolution.

“It turns out that the NCSE and its allies in the scientific and educational establishments don’t mind having religious beliefs discussed in science class, as long as those discussions are aimed at convincing students to convert to the religious beliefs favored by the NCSE”, added attorney Caldwell. “Their willingness to flagrantly violate students’ constitutionally protected religious freedoms in order to sell evolution to our children is the height of hypocrisy.”

–30–

Here are some references to website links relevant to this lawsuit [Note that these links are as they were given to me; if they don’t work, it may be that the pages are being changed to protect the guilty — AKA damage control]:

San Francisco, CA— A parent, Jeanne Caldwell, is filing a federal lawsuit today against officials of the University of California at Berkeley and the National Science Foundation over religious
statements on the “Understanding Evolution” website (http://evolution.berkeley.edu/), which was created with over $500,000 in federal funding. (http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward.do?AwardNumber=0096613)

According to the lawsuit, the website, which describes itself as the “ultimate evolution resource for K-12 teachers,” includes “classroom strategies” and exercises for public school teachers to use in science class to convince students of faith to change the religious convictions if students (http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/fosrec/Scott1.html)

A webpage called “Misconceptions: ‘Evolution and religion are incompatible’”
(http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/misconceps/IVAandreligion.shtml) makes the theological claim that “most Christian and Jewish religious groups have no conflict with the theory of evolution.” This is illustrated by a cartoon depicting a scientist shaking hands with a pastor holding a Bible with a cross on it.

The website exclusively directs instructors to statements by seventeen religious denominations and groups that adhere to the doctrine that there is no conflict between their religious beliefs and evolution. (http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/5025_statements_from_religious_orga_12_19_2002.asp)

A core claim of many evolutionists is that the origin of all life forms through evolution, including humans, was “unplanned” and “undirected’. This claim clearly contradicts the teaching of all of the world’s major religions, including Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism, that life on earth and people were created on purpose for a purpose.

The lawsuit alleges that officials are using government funding and resources to actively promote the religious beliefs held by a private organization, the National Center for Science Education, which has a “long history of religious advocacy” on the evolution issue. (http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/5025_statements_from_religious_orga_12_19_2002.asp)

Attorney Larry Caldwell, President of Quality Science Education for All, (http://www.qsea.org)

Pacific Justice Institute (http://www.pacificjustice.org/)

Here is another theological article on the website that may be of interest, since it pushes the idea that science deals with reality and religion deals with “personal preferences” and unreality: (http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/resources/readings_moore.shtml)

Comments
"Although it would be inappropriate for a teacherto encourage students towards or against any religious view, it is appropriate to inform them, in a comparative sense, of the existence of more than one religious perspective on creation and evolution." You know, Johnny, there are whole denominations who have almost completely capitulated to a thoroughgoing modernism in their ethics, theology and metaphysics. We scientists really love that. Wouldn't you rather be a nice little Enlightenment rationalist? You can still go to church, but you won't be bothered with cumbersome doctrines like theism, a real difference between right and wrong, etc. Here, I'd like you to meet my friend John Shelby Spong...dave
October 12, 2005
October
10
Oct
12
12
2005
12:54 PM
12
12
54
PM
PDT
"The link referenced above does not work. Makes me wonder if they have removed it as a result of this lawsuit." It appears to work if you add an "l": http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/fosrec/Scott1.htmlintp147
October 12, 2005
October
10
Oct
12
12
2005
12:25 PM
12
12
25
PM
PDT
This is the exact same type of problem the intelligent design (ID) movement has with creationists: they both use religion to further their cause. ID needs no such benefit. The shame is that ID is in no way a religious theory. It's the subjectivity of the uninformed and the deliberateness of the informed that put religious spins on the theory of ID. But then again, macroevolution has not proven itself to be a theory backed by scientific evidence. Many evolutionists talk about how ID is not a "testable" theory. Have any scientists been able to produce entirely new species from completely different ones? No. Has the fossil record shown any transitional forms linking new species to entirely different ones? No. All the fossil record shows is huge jumps, from one species to the next, and with no gradual intermediate forms in between. And yet so many evolutionists still believe in macroevolution. One can then notice how it takes an amount of "faith" to believe in macroevolution in spite of its lacking scientific evidence. And where you have faith, you have religion.mtgcsharpguy
October 12, 2005
October
10
Oct
12
12
2005
10:42 AM
10
10
42
AM
PDT
Darwinism: Another example of a failed religion!Benjii
October 12, 2005
October
10
Oct
12
12
2005
10:18 AM
10
10
18
AM
PDT
According to the lawsuit, the website, which describes itself as the “ultimate evolution resource for K-12 teachers,” includes “classroom strategies” and exercises for public school teachers to use in science class to convince students of faith to change the religious convictions if students (http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/fosrec/Scott1.htm)
The link referenced above does not work. Makes me wonder if they have removed it as a result of this lawsuit.DonaldM
October 12, 2005
October
10
Oct
12
12
2005
10:07 AM
10
10
07
AM
PDT
“It turns out that the NCSE and its allies in the scientific and educational establishments don’t mind having religious beliefs discussed in science class, as long as those discussions are aimed at convincing students to convert to the religious beliefs favored by the NCSE” So true. I wouldn't be surprised to find them replacing the "I'm an Honors Student" bumperstickers with Darwin fish. === Friends at UncommonDescent, Here is my latest piece on TAE: Warnings from the Ivory Towers (http://www.taemag.com/issues/articleid.18782/article_detail.asp) "In the most recent issue of the American Scientist, Pat Shipman issued a warning to his fellow Darwinists, informing them of the impending threat placed upon their theory by intelligent design (ID): “These events prompted me to take ID seriously, and this movement scares me. Now I feel like a jogger in the park at night who realizes that she is far too isolated and that the shadows are far too deep…. I fear my days are numbered unless I act soon and effectively. If you are reading this, the chances are that you are in the same position.” Shipman has officially sounded the alarm. This comes after twenty years of warnings from the ivory towers, issuing the message, “Protect Darwin, or else.” ..."JoeManzari
October 12, 2005
October
10
Oct
12
12
2005
09:49 AM
9
09
49
AM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply