Darwinism Evolution Intelligent Design Religion Science

Shift!: The Third Way of evolution is beginning to penetrate science-and-religion yawnfests

Spread the love

The Third Way of Evolution is a group of non-Darwinian or minimally Darwinian evolutionary biologists.

From Tom Heneghan at Religion News:

Since scientists succeeded in sequencing the genome in the late 1990s, they have found that epigenetic markers that regulate patterns of gene expression can reflect outside influences on a body.

Even simpler living objects such as plants contain a complex internal genetic system that governs their growth according to information they receive from outside.

To theologians who see a “new biology” emerging, this knowledge points to a more holistic system than scientists have traditionally seen, one more open to some divine inspiration for life.

In this view, the fact that epigenetic markers can bring outside pressures to bear on the genome deep inside a human means genetics is not a closed system, but part of the wider sweep of nature in which they, as religious thinkers, also see God’s hand.More.

Someone mentioned epigenetics? Wow.

Design theorist Michael Behe, author of Edge of Evolution, writes to say,

It strikes me as just pussyfooting around the verboten topic of intelligent design. Either the “holistic” organism could have arisen by unguided natural processes or it couldn’t. In the former case you have some variation or extension of Darwinism. In the latter you have intelligent design.

Possibly, Behe is too demanding here. To get past “Jesus loves Darwin and so should you!” so as to notice what is actually going on in studies of evolution today puts these people far out ahead of salaried, tenured, and unionized colleagues.

“Nature is so complex and rich and that prompts questions about why on earth is this the case? If you’re an atheist, how do you explain a universe that seems to have the capacity to produce these things in the first place?” asked Alister McGrath, an Oxford theologian who is director of the Ian Ramsey Centre for Science and Religion that hosted the conference. More.

Ah, a question we can easily answer: They don’t need to explain it; like Google, they just need to enforce it against people who ask. After all, only an enemy would question the system.

The Paradigm Shifters: Overthrowing 'the Hegemony of the Culture of Darwin' See also: Dawkins: Maybe the hard problem of consciousness can never be solved Unless one’s idea of solving the problem is burbling up fresh trivia.

Tales of the Tone Deaf, featuring dim profs writing in dozy journals about why people doubt Science and how to fix them.

Cosmic inflation theory loses hangups about the scientific method: What if naturalism changes the role of a science program? Perhaps stubbornly contrary evidence merely shows the need for more drive and zeal in generating new naturalist theories, not more reflection and evaluation of that direction.

On Third Way approaches: Paradigm Shifters by Suzan Mazur

5 Replies to “Shift!: The Third Way of evolution is beginning to penetrate science-and-religion yawnfests

  1. 1
    Dionisio says:

    Here’s a discussion thread News started over 3 years ago, which deals with this 3rd way of evolution thing:

    https://uncommondescent.com/evolution/a-third-way-of-evolution/

    BTW, once in there, you may want to take a quick look at the comment @1090:

    https://uncommondescent.com/evolution/a-third-way-of-evolution/#comment-621816

  2. 2
    Granville Sewell says:

    News,
    There is no “third way” between materialism and ID, Behe is right that this is just “pussyfooting around the verboten topic of ID.” Scientists who recognize that Darwinism is absurd, but don’t want to be associated with ID, invented this as a way to show their disapproval of both, but I think they know there is no third way.

    However, you are also right that we should welcome this movement, we may never see a majority of scientists explicitly supporting design, but I would be quite happy if the majority just admitted they don’t have the answers, that would be a great improvement over what we have had to endure for 150 years.

  3. 3
    LocalMinimum says:

    It is a useful solvent.

  4. 4
    Mung says:

    Along with the Third Way we also now have Code Biology.

    I think our strategy should be to highlight the non-Darwinian nature of these projects so that those who support them are forced to take a stand and either admit they are Darwinians or say why they are not.

  5. 5
    Charles says:

    “Jesus loves Darwin and so should you!”

    More like: “Love Darwin but hate Darwinism”

Leave a Reply