Darwinism Evolution Intelligent Design

What will be the next time and money-wasting error Darwinism leads scientists into?

Spread the love

What’s the next time and money-wasting error Darwinism leads scientists into?

Researchers are discovering that what had been dismissed as evolution’s relics are actually vital to life. What used to be considered evidence for neo-Darwinism gene-formation mechanism can no longer be use as such evidence. In this case, neo-Darwinism has been a proven science inhibitor as it postponed serious investigation of the non-coding DNA within the genome, which was “one of the biggest mistakes in the history of molecular biology” [John Mattick, BioEssays, 2003 930-939].” This is reminiscent of the classification of 86 (later expanded to 180) human organs as “vestigial” that Robert Wiedersheim (1893) believed “lost their original physiological significance.” in that they were vestiges of evolution. Functions have since been discovered for all 180 organs that were thought to be vestigial, including the wings of flightless birds, the appendix, and the ear muscles of humans.”

Don Johnson, Probability’s Nature and the Nature of Probability, pp. 58-59.

The explicit reason for both the junk DNA error and the vestigial organs error was the need to find evidence for Darwinism in the form of stuff in life forms that doesn’t work. Without that need, these errors would not have been made. For many kids, mid-twentieth century, it was an error that resulted in needless, risky surgeries, removing supposedly vestigial tonsils and adenoids.

What will the next error be? Thoughts?

The Darwinist can take comfort that he is paid to stop science, and entitled to persecute those who want a reckoning – though that latter right is becoming more tenuous, as the recent Granville Sewell case and others show.

Remember, you can win a copy of Probability’s Nature and the Nature of Probability in this contest, which closes Saturday (August 6, 2011): “Uncommon Descent contest: List the five books that helped ID most – written by non-ID researchers”

6 Replies to “What will be the next time and money-wasting error Darwinism leads scientists into?

  1. 1
    Joseph says:

    Sure vestigal organs function- they just don’t have their original function. That is what evolution does.

    And sure junk dna has a function NOW, that is what evolution does.

    IOW there aren’t any errors with evolution, just errors made by creationists.

    😛

  2. 2
    Ilion says:

    Without that need, these errors would not have been made. For many kids, mid-twentieth century, it was an error that resulted in needless, risky surgeries, removing supposedly vestigial tonsils and adenoids.

    My mother’s “useless” tonsils were yanked twice … and grew back again.

  3. 3
    Mung says:

    Did the old ones grow back or did new ones come in?

  4. 4
    Robert Byers says:

    This yEC always finds the vestigial subject a gain for creationism.
    they always use vestigial bits and pieces to prove to the public that evolution has taken place.
    Yet in fact all it does is demonstrate the opposite. there are very few vestigial bits showing forming anatomical physical lives.
    All of biology should be crawling with remnants and leftovers if they use the few leftovers to try to prove their points.
    I do believe leftovers are pregnant with trails.

    Now they do have to say that vestigial bits remain because of use because evolution did not select them.
    Evolution selected everything else away.
    if bugs to buffalos is true evolution musr explain the lack of vestigial bits.
    right now they are in transition.
    Our tails will be found to have been useful for all these years just watch.

  5. 5
    junkdnaforlife says:

    Robert: “Our tails will be found to have been useful for all these years just watch.”

    Our tails help us get our poo and hump on:

    “The coccyx serves many different purposes. When you sit down, this bone helps to balance the weight of your body. If you are required to sit for most of the day, your coccyx is the part of your body that makes this possible to do comfortably. Without it you would have no support. The coccyx is also a link to many other important muscles and ligaments that are important for everyday bodily functions. It is what makes performing a bowel movement possible due to the support it provides to the pelvis and anus. Without a healthy tailbone, it would be awkward for you to walk, sit, use the bathroom, play sports and have sexual intercourse.

    http://www.losethebackpain.com.....occyx.html

  6. 6
    Robert Byers says:

    junkdnaforlife
    I didn’t know this as i never investigated the matter. i knew the “tail’ is brought up to say we were critters.
    That is a good answer .
    I guess AIG and ICR know it.
    It does make sense there is need.

    In fact evolutionism would have to agree as they have to say anything that sticks around must of enduring function.
    so the tail ly babies much brought up need only be seen as minor abberations of the tailbone and not a former tail ly past.
    Interesting post from you to me.

Leave a Reply