Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Evolutionary psychologists: Might a taller opponent defeat Obama?

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email
File:Pierre Elliot Trudeau-2.jpg
Trudeau, 1980 - actually taller than opponent?/jbarta

From “Caveman Politics: Has Our Violent History Led to an Evolved Preference for Physically Strong Political Leaders?” (ScienceDaily, Oct. 18, 2011), we learn:

The author’s interest in the physical strength of political leaders stems from the popular observation that taller candidates have won 58 percent of US presidential elections between 1789 and 2008; a trend known as the “presidential height index” by political pundits.

“We believe this research extends beyond merely establishing an association between physical stature and leadership by offering a theoretical basis for this phenomenon,” said Schmitz. “Culture and environment alone cannot explain how a preference for taller leaders is a universal trait we see in different cultures today, as well as in societies ranging from ancient Mayans, to pre-classical Greeks, and even animals.”

They close with

“So while at 6’1″ Barack Obama towered over the 5’8″ John McCain in 2008, perhaps he’ll meet his physical equal in one of the ‘big man’ governors in the 6’1″ Rick Perry or the 6’2″ Mitt Romney in November 2012.”

Hold on! Big, loud people tend to stand out more easily than small, quiet people. That would be enough to explain the phenomenon in ancient times, without further theoretical basis.

The evolutionary psychologists  may be on to something here, but it’s a good idea to ask what: People do expect leaders to be bigger than other people. In one country, a woman recounted gushing to a friend about Pierre Trudeau, who had clamped down hard on civil liberties,

“He’s shorter than he should be!” For you see, I’d thought that he must be a giant.

Trudeau’s key political opponent, Joe Clark, was portrayed as puny in the media, but there is good reason to believe that he was physically taller than Trudeau (now deceased). Perceptions of tallness in leaders are now largely folklore.

Now, could a taller opponent defeat Obama? Probably not, because if the example here offered is an indicator, popular folklore will simply portray whoever is the favourite of most opinion leaders … as taller. And no one need shout to get heard on the Internet.

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Comments
Taller? Its more likely that taller people simply in life gained more confidence and then ability . being big does matter as a kid. On fact taller people seem to be more successful when i look around. To say its about being tal is to say oits not about other matters so they should show the shorter candidate was the better one. Obama surely will win again. The way to beat him is for the very reason he was promoted, supported, and voted (by many many) . The issue of identity. its all been about the right and greater right of a non white to assume the prestiges office. Its all about being African. the man himself is a ordinary civil servant quota. Still better then the previous prez but thats saying nothing. IOne needs a true american to say NO to the african in his and supporters claims that he and he represents who deserves to be the boss. Who doesn't also is involved. A true american to take on the great idea that animated America. tHe right of any man, common or elite, to become president if born there. Obama is against this. Beat him with a great ideal and idea and ideology . All of modern North America is run on the issue of identity determining who gets what. Something to aim at. I see no one right now.Robert Byers
November 26, 2011
November
11
Nov
26
26
2011
01:13 AM
1
01
13
AM
PDT

Leave a Reply