Human evolution News

Homo Naledi: Hawks accuses Shermer of murdering facts

Spread the love

Celebrated SkepticTM Michael Shermer makes the case in Scientific American recently that the recently found Naledi fossils represent humans engaged in murder rather than burial after natural death:

Finally, the ages of the 13 individuals so identified—three infants, three young juveniles, one old juvenile, one subadult, four young adults and one old adult—are unlike those of other cave deposits for which cause of death and deposition have been determined. It’s a riddle, wrapped in sediment, inside a grotto.

I believe the authors are downplaying an all too common cause of death in our ancestors—homicide in the form of war, murder or sacrifice. Lawrence H. Keeley, in War Before Civilization (1996), and Steven A. LeBlanc, in Constant Battles (2003), review hundreds of archaeological studies showing that significant percentages of ancestral people died violently. January 1, 2016

Turning paleontology into a murder mystery never hurt public interest, right?

So then paleoanthropologist John Hawks, often a voice of common sense, responds

Shermer is a regular columnist and contributing editor of Scientific American and the editor of Skeptic magazine. He is widely recognized as a leader of the skeptic movement in the U.S.

It doesn’t sound like the work of a skeptic. Shermer does not seem to have read our open access paper very carefully, because he seems completely oblivious to the evidence most relevant to his idea.

Basically, the bones don’t show signs of violence.

None of the bone fragments have traces of cutmarks or tooth marks that would result from butchery, disarticulation, percussion, or consumption of the remains. There are no cranial bone fragments with radiating fracture lines or signs of intentional breakage. In other words, none of the bone shows any traces that indicate that the individuals met a violent end.

Hawks suggests that Shermer’s interest in ancestral violence is causing him to read things into the story.

File:A small cup of coffee.JPG Well, if we are into speculation anyway, how about this: No one who was a victim of violence was buried there for fear of evil spirits?

There is a paleo-novel in here somewhere. Auel? Jean Auel?

See also: 2015, Hominid hype of the year: homo Naledi

and

The search for our earliest ancestors: signals in the noise

Follow UD News at Twitter!

2 Replies to “Homo Naledi: Hawks accuses Shermer of murdering facts

  1. 1
    Mapou says:

    It obvious that the skeptic (i.e., atheist) community suffers from a disproportionately high incidence of mental illness.

  2. 2
    News says:

    Well, Mapou, there could be a great novelist in there screaming to get out. But that’s not science -and neither is skepticism, in isolation.

Leave a Reply