Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

$50,000 creationist essay contest

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Here is a press release from Answers in Genesis (AiG), second only to the Institute for Creation Research in influence among young earth creationists. It describes a $50,000 essay contest for a creationist paper by high-school and college students. Further down are the stated rules for the contest.

Although those rules seem to allow for a straight ID paper, in fact they do not. Liberty University, which is administering the award in the form of a scholarship, holds to a strict 6-day creation view, even requiring a semester course on creation-evolution from a young earth perspective. In consequence, the essays are expected to explicitly adopt this perspective.

For all the talk about intelligent design being “incredibly well funded,” we have nowhere near the resources of these creationist organizations. Moreover, they seem to be making sure to exclude ID’s distinctive contributions to the origins debate by requiring work that is not merely independent of the age of the earth but instead argues postively for a young earth.

This contest demonstrates that creationism and ID are charting separate paths.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, August 29, 2006
Contact: Cindy Malott, (859) 727-2222 ext. 461

$50,000 grand prize announced for “Research Paper Challenge 2007”

PETERSBURG, Kentucky. ­In a bold move sure to catch the eyes of students, Answers in Genesis today announces “Research Paper Challenge 2007.” The contest will encourage students to defend biblical authority in an unbiblical world. The grand prize is a $50,000 scholarship to Liberty University, a premier Christian institution in Virginia with 10,000 students.

The Research Paper Challenge, now in its second year, is sponsored by Answers in Genesis and open to students aged 14–21. This year’s focus is AiG’s latest information-packed resource, Evolution Exposed. This new book confronts evolutionary indoctrination head-on, revealing the misinformation, naturalistic bias and outright censorship in public school science textbooks. By encouraging youth to understand science and its cultural impact, AiG hopes to help raise up the next generation of scripturally grounded defenders of the Christian faith.

“We’re so excited to partner with Liberty on the Challenge,” commented Ken Ham, AiG president and a popular speaker, writer and radio host. “Today’s public schools are saturated with evolutionary thinking and immorality. By showing youth the gaping holes in evolutionism and pointing to the Bible, we can help rescue this generation from doubt and purposelessness.”

The winner of the $50,000 scholarship (which is larger than first prize for the 2006 Miss America Pageant) will be announced after the April 16, 2007, deadline. Runners-up will receive laptop computers and other prizes. Visit www.ResearchPaperChallenge2007.com for details.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Answers in Genesis, soon to open the $25 million Creation Museum near the Cincinnati International Airport, defends the Bible’s accuracy from the very first verse. In addition to its award-winning website www.AnswersInGenesis.org and the popular quarterly magazine Answers (www.AnswersMagazine.com), its daily radio program, Answers … with Ken Ham, is aired on more than 820 US stations.

Liberty University is a nationally accredited institution that develops Christ-centered men and women with the values, knowledge and skills to impact tomorrow’s world. Students are required to take a creation apologetics course that teaches the same literal Genesis / young earth approach of AiG. Visit Liberty on the web at www.liberty.edu.

-30-

———————-

Comments
Dr Dembski, Thank you for putting your paper online. I look forward to reading it when I get the time. Meanwhile, I would be very interested to know your views. Is a synopsis available or would you or Salvador be able to summarise the paper here? I was brought up a Christian, but having studied "the other side" to get some balance, I am not quite so sure now. I think the New Testament is very inspiring but parts of the Old Testament are very disturbing and have made me question my faith. Examples can be found at Steve Locks' controversial "Leaving Christianity" website: http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~slocks/decon.html Having said that, I think the ID movement is fantastic and the (mostly) wonderful folk who post to this board are usually very balanced and reasonable in their views. A great asset for ID, in being a purely scientific approach, is that it isn't tied to a particular faith. This is very welcome to people like me who think there is good possibility of a higher purpose but don't feel confident to subscribe to any particular brand of religion.rabbite_uk
September 1, 2006
September
09
Sep
1
01
2006
04:18 PM
4
04
18
PM
PDT
jerry, I guess it depends on what one considers "believing in the Bible literally." I believe that the Bible is God-inspired, inerrant, and true (in it's original languages). Though, I admit, my belief in this is nearly entirely by faith -- faith that God would both provide and protect His truth. The other part of me believes this because I feel it's necessary in order for me to not instill my own beliefs into the Bible by deleting or ignoring those things I don't like or find hard to live by. My fear is that I could say, well that "No lusting" part shouldn't be taken literally or was added later by uptight Christians. And to me, this destroys the integrity of my faith. With that said, I don't believe in a literal 6 day creation, but then I don't believe the Bible (strictly) says that the world was created in 6 days (in Hebrew). I also don't believe in a young Earth, which I don't believe the Bible tackles at all. However, as weird as it sounds to me when I'm reading it, I do believe that God appeared to Moses as a burning bush and spoke to His prophet using a donkey! Because if those are just stories and not true history of God's miracles in the world, then I feel my faith it futile. And if that's not true, then why should I believe something as crazy as a God coming down as man in the flesh, executed on a cross an innocent man, and rising from the dead in 3 days in order to save me from my sin -- the center of the Christian faith. And when I start believing that's just another Christian myth, then my faith is beyond futile. It is nothing.dodgingcars
September 1, 2006
September
09
Sep
1
01
2006
03:21 PM
3
03
21
PM
PDT
There was a survey released in the press earlier this week about belief in the bible. The two highest states that believe that the bible is literally true are Alabama and Arkansas, with 75% of the people agreeing. Where I live (Northeast) the number was in the low 20's and I will say personally that I have never met anyone who I know that claimed to believe the bible literally. I am sure I have but I cannot think of anyone at the moment. So it is interesting for me to listen to those here who do believe in the bible literally. But you should be aware that most people, even a lot of good Christians, think this is strange. Sometimes, I get the feeling that there is not enough communication from both sides and each side knows little about the other. My guess is that the creationists know more about the non-creationist because that is all the popular media is about but there is little known by the people in my circle about creationists. There are a lot of stereotypes. Let me give you an example. My daughter went to Penn State and was in the woman's singing group and everyone went on a hayride and the night was beautiful, full of stars. She and another young woman were lying back and looking at the stars and my daughter remarked about how many worlds up there might be like our own. The other young woman said she did not think there were any because the bible didn't say there was any. My daughter was taken aback and her reaction was that this was a ludicrous reason to have such a belief. This other young woman was planning on being a doctor and my daughter wondered how she could ever be a doctor with such backward science beliefs. I told my daughter that I did not think it would have any effect because she would probably be well trained and biology (outside of evolution) or any other medical training is not something that would be an issue. But that was daughter's instinctive reaction. Nearly everyone from my area reading the above post about the $50,000 scholarship would probably think it is strange and if would most likely stiffen their opposition to anything creationists might propose or support. That is one of the biggest hurdles that ID has, it association with creationist science. It looks like a conversion attempt to them and anything that smacks of that will be resisted with a lot of effort.jerry
September 1, 2006
September
09
Sep
1
01
2006
01:32 PM
1
01
32
PM
PDT
Gods iPod, Yes, since all his books affirm special creation of the universe (he takes the big bang as a transcendental event) as well as special creation (and special extinction) of the species, etc, I'd be more than interested in the video. My email is heddle AT fbyg DOT orgDavid Heddle
September 1, 2006
September
09
Sep
1
01
2006
01:21 PM
1
01
21
PM
PDT
I have a video of him calling miracles a bunch of nonsense if you'd like me to send it to you?Gods iPod
September 1, 2006
September
09
Sep
1
01
2006
01:15 PM
1
01
15
PM
PDT
GodsIPod, "But since Hugh Ross doesn’t believe in the miraculous," Of course he does--you're joking, right?David Heddle
September 1, 2006
September
09
Sep
1
01
2006
12:53 PM
12
12
53
PM
PDT
Bill, I read your paper a few weeks ago. I really liked it! I highly recommend it to my YEC brethren to read and consider. Salvadorscordova
September 1, 2006
September
09
Sep
1
01
2006
12:35 PM
12
12
35
PM
PDT
"If OECs like Hugh Ross ever come around to ID, that would be good too" Well, that would be a miracle. But since Hugh Ross doesn't believe in the miraculous, I think we can safely scratch that one :)Gods iPod
September 1, 2006
September
09
Sep
1
01
2006
12:31 PM
12
12
31
PM
PDT
Regarding YEC organizations, a very ID-friendly YEC organization is the Baraminology Study Group (BSG). One does not even have to be a creationist or pro-IDer to serve on the editorial board (Richard Sternberg, an evolutionist is the best example) of BSG. That's the kind of YEC organization that is good for ID and good for creationism. Participation in such organizations does not require any sort of credal confession. This sort of ID-friendly inquiry into YEC is what I hope for. There is no reason YECs and IDers need to be at odds. The BSG is a glowing example of a welcoming atmosphere. I hope more YEC organizations follow suit. If OECs like Hugh Ross ever come around to ID, that would be good too. Salvadorscordova
September 1, 2006
September
09
Sep
1
01
2006
12:21 PM
12
12
21
PM
PDT
For those still finding their way through the OEC-YEC thicket, here's where I ended up: http://www.designinference.com/documents/2006.05.christian_theodicy.pdf.William Dembski
September 1, 2006
September
09
Sep
1
01
2006
12:05 PM
12
12
05
PM
PDT
"At some point, ID and Creationism will knock horns" At some point? A year ago I received a bunch of emails from a senior at Answers in Genesis warning me of my 'evangelism' of ID. He attached several articles to back up his position of the evils of ID. They have gone unread for the most part. The sheer arrogance that some YECs have is so un-Christ-like, it defies belief that they can't see their own hypocrisy. And in full disclosure, I DO lean towards a literal 6-day creation account, though I am open to being shown otherwise. Of course, for many YECs, this openness to learning more makes me a heretic. C'est la vie.Gods iPod
September 1, 2006
September
09
Sep
1
01
2006
10:59 AM
10
10
59
AM
PDT
Among YECs I'm foremost in my dislike of Answers in Genesis (AiG). They do not, imho, serve the Christian faith as well as they could. ID is not a theological viewpoint, ID does not assert itself as Gospel. ID a formulated as a falsifiable scientific hypothesis, not an infallible doctrinal statement. So why should their be trouble? The way ID will prosper is for YECs to dissociate themselves from AiG and create YEC organizations friendlier to ID where ideas about the age of the Earth are not used as a litmus test for an individual's moral character. The foremost YEC organization is Loma Linda/GRI where Timothy Standish (and IDer) teaches and does research. Other YEC organization not affiliated with AiG are www.creationscience.com (Walter Brown) and www.setterfield.org (Barry Setterfield). But hardly anyone knows that (so far). Within the Presbyterian Church of America (PCA) there is a brewing fight between pro-ID YECs and pro-AiG YECs. See: An Open Letter to Our Brother Elders of Westminster Presbytery. I suppose if the pro-AiG YECs had their way, they would put the majority of ministers elder and deacons in the PCA General Assembly on church trial and toss out most of the professors at reformed seminaries. Dave Snoke is in the PCA and so am I. If pro-AiG YEC prevail in the PCA, I wonder what will happen to me (a pro-ID YEC) or PCA elders like Dave Snoke? Salvadorscordova
September 1, 2006
September
09
Sep
1
01
2006
10:55 AM
10
10
55
AM
PDT
As a YEC, it is abundantly clear to me that ID and Creationism are in fact two seperate ways of looking at the origin of life, the universe, and everything. I'm always surprised to read/hear anti-ID folk suggest these two rather distant cousins are the same, showing their ignorance on the matter. One describes the God who did it, the other merely suggests that Darwinian evolution is insufficient and believe evidence speaks of design. It would be irresponsible for Creationists to ignore the contributions of the ID movement. ID has attempted to step away from religion and just so the science of their claims, while YEC cannot remove our beliefs from God. We believe our interpretation of the data can verify the truth of the Bible, but it is still religiously heavy-handed. The same cannot be said of ID. At some point, ID and Creationism will knock horns, and that is sad. The scientists in both fields could help each other tear down the lie of Darwinism. However, maybe when that war is one, the battle between ID and YEC will commence? For us strict creationists, ID could be used as a wedge to overcome Darwin and evangelize people. But that's clearly not the intent of IDs. Does anyone else believe this is a potential cause of friction between the two camps?faithandshadow
September 1, 2006
September
09
Sep
1
01
2006
10:21 AM
10
10
21
AM
PDT
I have told the Director of Creation Studies there the following: - 0 - I'm happy to let people know about your contest, David, but I do think you should clarify that by "...to defend Biblical authority in an unbiblical world" you mean "defend the young earth perspective." When you say, "An ID essay could be submitted, but would not be selected as the winner," I feel it would be fair to let the would-be contestants know that clearly up front. That said, I would like to commend you for offering a contest, and will urge other Christian-based universities to do the same, offering prizes for work from a variety of ID-related perspectives. cheers, Denyse - 0 -O'Leary
September 1, 2006
September
09
Sep
1
01
2006
07:32 AM
7
07
32
AM
PDT
Sigh. It's a good thing that Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, Charles Hodge, B. B. Warfield, Gleason Archer, Francis Schaeffer, etc. aren't alive and interested in Liberty University. The message to them would be: "Heathen, be gone".David Heddle
September 1, 2006
September
09
Sep
1
01
2006
07:27 AM
7
07
27
AM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply