Karl Niklas’ new review of the evolution of evolutionist’s understanding of evolution, and in particular the evolution of multicellularity, now admits that multicellularity must have evolved at least, err, a dozen times or more. So much for common descent and its powerful explanatory power. Once again, for evolutionists it’s all about convergence, lineage-specific biology and Aristotelianism: Read more
3 Replies to “A New Review of the Evolution of Multicellularity”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
As a novice, looking at the plausible origin of multicellularity through bottom up random variation/natural selection processes, it strikes me, not only as impossible but, as a ludicrous notion bordering on insanity to even imagine it can be done. The more I have learned about what would have to be involved, in turning a single celled creature into a multi-trillion celled creature, has only strengthened my conviction in the matter. First, as Dr. James Tour notes in the following video and quote,,,
,,,i.e. it is extremely difficult to coax molecules into a desired (Intelligently Designed) molecular machine without using already preexisting molecular machines to help you do the job, and even then it is extremely difficult to build a ‘new’ molecular machine, such as the nano-car that Tour’s team built,,
This problem for the bottom up processes of neo-Darwinian evolution become much more apparent as we take note of this following piece of trivia on Flagellum fabrication:
You can catch a glimpse of the stunning engineering parameters, and the precise manner in the step by step assembly process of the bacterial flagellum, that inspired it to be modeled, in the following video:
Clearly there is some instruction code somewhere in the bacterial cell that directs the construction, but it is far from clear that it resides in DNA alone as neo-Darwinists presuppose. In fact, there are some very good reasons for supposing that construction/fabrication coding does not, and cannot, reside entirely in DNA:
And the ‘form’ problem just becomes exponentially exasperated for bottom up materialistic explanations as we consider multicellular creatures instead of just the ‘form’ of single celled creatures:
Yet, Darwinists actually believe that randomly rearranging molecules, and selecting the lucky accidents, can account for such fabrication complexity. A level of complexity that man has yet to fully understand yet. Indeed, it is a level of complexity that man may never fully understand, much less imitate:
Verse and Music:
From the paper: “Multicellularity has evolved at least once in every major eukaryotic clade (in all ploidy levels) and numerous times among the prokaryotes.”
Really? You have evidence indicating this?