From my friend Shawn Mitchell:
There may never have been a less scientific campaign than the public face of Global Warming Alarmism.
As the warming pause approaches two decades; the models and their predictions stand in shatters without rationale, and predicted disasters regularly are falsified (much to the polar bears’ joy) you would think an authoritarian movement to seize control of our energy, consumption, and economy would be moved to “pause” and reflect on the merits and uncertainties of its case. You would be wrong.
The wronger they look, the shriller they get, the more absolute their demands, the more sure and vituperative their response to skepticism. They are a religion impervious to empiricism or doubt.
Has anyone noticed any parallels in the subject oft-debated in these pages?