Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Almost Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Design

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

As we learn more, this is becoming increasingly, transparently obvious. Random errors can screw things up, and — in very rare circumstances — provide a survival advantage in a pathological environment.

The notion that random errors filtered by natural selection can account for all that is found in biological systems is a pathetically illogical, hopelessly improbable explanation for the information-processing machinery of the cell.

Chemistry is not the basis of life. Chemistry is the medium; information is the message.

On the subject of chemistry: The ID movement has thrown a satchel charge of trinitrotoluene into the Darwinian faux-edifice, and blown it to bits (pun intended).

Comments
Chemistry is not the basis of life. Chemistry is the medium; information is the message.” The fact of death proves that chemistry is not the basis of life. What? Do atoms and molecules get tired of reacting one with another, or do individual atoms keep a count of how often/recently they’re reacted with specific other atoms, such that they need to take a rest … and too bad for the organism in which too many of its constituent chemicals go on vacation at once?Ilion
August 14, 2010
August
08
Aug
14
14
2010
10:13 PM
10
10
13
PM
PDT
Bruce David @ 2 -- as I see it, the day with come when even the proverbial "village idiot" -- the one who knows himself to be an idiot -- will understand that even he is entitled to mock the amazing "self discipline" (that is, obstinacy) of DarwinDefenders.Ilion
August 14, 2010
August
08
Aug
14
14
2010
10:08 PM
10
10
08
PM
PDT
Gil, I will look forward to reading that story.tgpeeler
August 14, 2010
August
08
Aug
14
14
2010
10:08 PM
10
10
08
PM
PDT
BA77, As it happens, I watched that video today. As you know, I am a former militant atheist like Richard Dawkins who had a presumably unshakable philosophical bias, but once confronted with the evidence, I found that I could no longer deny the truth as it smacked me over the head with ever-increasing force. At one point I had to admit that everything I believed about everything that matters was wrong. Reason, and much more -- especially the birth of my first daughter after a long infertility ordeal -- demanded it. It was for her, at age five in 1994, that I bought a cartoon video entitled The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe. I had no idea who C.S. Lewis was. It was thus that I was introduced to a world of which I was completely unaware. At the behest of a friend, I read Michael Denton's first book, and my atheistic, materialistic worldview entered a state of immediate, catastrophic, and irrevocable collapse. One day I will write up my story. Those who cannot think, refuse to think, or have hearts so hardened that seeing Christ on the cross would evoke no sympathy or repentance, I cannot reach. But Someone Else can, even at the last minute.GilDodgen
August 14, 2010
August
08
Aug
14
14
2010
09:13 PM
9
09
13
PM
PDT
It's so true--the design in living systems is so blazingly obvious that it takes the greatest self discipline to deny it. There will come a time when people will shake their heads in wonder that any intelligent person in possession of the facts of biology could ever have believed that life could have arisen and evolved by natural causes.Bruce David
August 14, 2010
August
08
Aug
14
14
2010
08:49 PM
8
08
49
PM
PDT
Gil, I don't know if you've seen it, but I liked this video of a debate Dr. Behe was in earlier this year. He said in his opening statement that the cell literally reeks of design. Watch the Debate Between Michael Behe and Stephen Barr http://www.evolutionnews.org/2010/08/watch_the_debate_between_micha037301.htmlbornagain77
August 14, 2010
August
08
Aug
14
14
2010
07:44 PM
7
07
44
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply