Swirling around the planet’s equator, the rings of Saturn are a dead giveaway that the planet is spinning at a tilt. The belted giant rotates at a 26.7-degree angle relative to the plane in which it orbits the sun. Astronomers have long suspected that this tilt comes from gravitational interactions with its neighbor Neptune, as Saturn’s tilt precesses, like a spinning top, at nearly the same rate as the orbit of Neptune.
But a new modeling study by astronomers at MIT and elsewhere has found that, while the two planets may have once been in sync, Saturn has since escaped Neptune’s pull. What was responsible for this planetary realignment? The team has one meticulously tested hypothesis: a missing moon.
In a study appearing in Science, the team proposes that Saturn, which today hosts 83 moons, once harbored at least one more, an extra satellite that they name Chrysalis. Together with its siblings, the researchers suggest, Chrysalis orbited Saturn for several billion years, pulling and tugging on the planet in a way that kept its tilt, or “obliquity,” in resonance with Neptune.
But around 160 million years ago, the team estimates, Chrysalis became unstable and came too close to its planet in a grazing encounter that pulled the satellite apart. The loss of the moon was enough to remove Saturn from Neptune’s grasp and leave it with the present-day tilt.
What’s more, the researchers surmise, while most of Chrysalis’ shattered body may have made impact with Saturn, a fraction of its fragments could have remained suspended in orbit, eventually breaking into small icy chunks to form the planet’s signature rings.
The missing satellite, therefore, could explain two longstanding mysteries: Saturn’s present-day tilt and the age of its rings, which were previously estimated to be about 100 million years old — much younger than the planet itself.
Sometime between 200 and 100 million years ago, Chrysalis entered a chaotic orbital zone, experienced a number of close encounters with Iapetus and Titan, and eventually came too close to Saturn, in a grazing encounter that ripped the satellite to bits, leaving a small fraction to circle the planet as a debris-strewn ring.Full article at EurekAlert.
However they formed, we can appreciate that Saturn’s rings have offered telescope viewers a spectacular jewel in the night sky.
3 Replies to “At EurekAlert: Saturn’s rings and tilt could be the product of an ancient, missing moon”
Many years ago I read that Saturn’s rings are a temporary phenomenon. They are unstable in that pieces get picked up by other moons, fall into Saturn, or flip out of Saturn’s gravity well. I gather there are slow overall losses of energy/momentum in the particles’ movements in orbit – a sort of friction effect. The rings weren’t there 200 million years ago and will probably be mostly gone in another 100 million or so. Thus, on a geological time scale, we are “lucky” to have a planet with a visible ring system; something that has helped humans study and better understand the Universe.
“Thus, on a geological time scale, we are “lucky” to have a planet with a visible ring system; something that has helped humans study and better understand the Universe.”
Seems like atheists believe in a LOT of LUCK to explain the universe. Sorry. I doubt you are an atheist, but when you take purpose, design, intent, and God out of the mix, luck and chance become your gods.
I am decidedly NOT an atheist, hence the quotation marks around the word “lucky”. But I see no point in inserting God into every post and comment. ID has enough strong and irrefutable evidence for intentional design; it does not need to use Saturn’s rings for that purpose. We should use evidence appropriately, without trying to make everything into evidence for ID. That just opens us up to doubt and possible ridicule; a Darwinist would just belittle the long list of vague and maybe evidence, and then just dismiss the hard evidence.