Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

At Evolution News: Michael Behe in World Magazine — “Game Over” for Darwinism

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

David Klinghoffer writes:

Image: A scene from “Molecular Machines — ATP Synthase: The Power Plant of the Cell,” via Discovery Institute.

Professor Behe was present at a “semi-secret” scientific gathering “whose theme was a specific controversial question: Did Darwinian evolution have any limitations?” ATP synthase (pictured above) is a fearfully and wonderfully made molecular machine, the “power plant of the cell.” John Walker [a British scientist who has studied ATP synthase for over 40 years] had the floor and was discussing his area of expertise. Behe explains:

ATP synthase is not simple. Comprising thousands of amino acid building blocks in about 10 kinds of protein chains, its intricate structure carefully directs a flow of acid particles, beginning from outside the cell, through deep channels in the machine’s organization, into the cell’s interior. Somehow, like the cascade of water over a hydroelectric dam that turns a turbine, the flow of acid through the channels rotates a central camshaft. The cams push against multiple discrete areas of a stationary region of the synthase, distorting their shapes. The distortion forces together two bound feed-chemicals, ADP and phosphate, provoking them to react to yield the energy-rich-yet-stable molecule ATP. As the camshaft completes a turn, the ATP is released into the cell, and the machine begins another cycle. Incredibly, the many copies of the machine in each person produce about 150 pounds of ATP molecules every day, but each is used rapidly as energy — in effect, recharging each cell like a reusable battery.

And Walker’s more recent studies — using the ­newest, most powerful iteration of microscopy, called “cryo-electron” microscopy — would reveal its mechanism in unprecedented detail.

A Snipe Hunt

But there was an obvious problem:

By now, the scientists assembled before Dr. John Walker had run out of patience. The man had just held forth for nearly an hour on this miracle of biological architecture. Elegant and complex, precision-engineered, multiplied daily in the billions across the biosphere and on which the entirety of life depends. Finally, during the Q&A period, a questioner asked him directly: How could a mindless Darwinian process produce such a stunning piece of work?

Walker’s entire reply (paraphrasing): “Slowly, through some sort of intermediate or other.”

Far out of earshot I muttered two simple words: “Game over.”

If a Nobel laureate who has worked on one of life’s most fundamental systems for four decades can’t give an account of how it supposedly arose through a series of lucky mutations and natural selection — despite knowing its innermost workings in spectacular detail — then it’s reasonable to conclude no such account exists, and the effort to find one is a snipe hunt. [Emphasis added.]

A snipe hunt is a “fool’s errand” because the so-called snipe in the metaphor is an imaginary animal. And indeed the game is over for Darwinian evolutionary theory: an unguided evolutionary explanation for what Behe calls irreducibly complex structures, including ATP synthase, will not be found. It remains for Darwin’s apologists, some of them rather vicious, to recognize this and permit the public to hear it, too. Read the rest of Behe’s essay for World here.

Full article at Evolution News.
Comments
It is telling that Behe publishes his anecdotal essay about this "semi-secret" conference in an overtly Christian, paywalled e-zine. That makes the likelihood of anyone in the scientific community seeing it close to nil. And, once again, just in case we missed it, ID is not religion dressed up as "science." And I am the king of Siam.....chuckdarwin
October 6, 2022
October
10
Oct
6
06
2022
05:12 AM
5
05
12
AM
PDT
Yet another nail in the coffin of Darwinism.,,, And, as with John Walker's talk on the 'stunning' molecular machine that is ATP, in a great number of instances, it is Darwinists themselves who are the ones driving the nails into the Darwinian coffin. https://f4.bcbits.com/img/a0096906383_16.jpgbornagain77
October 6, 2022
October
10
Oct
6
06
2022
03:27 AM
3
03
27
AM
PDT
How many nails in Darwin's coffin does this make? Sadly, rather than accept the lack of evidence for what it is, Darwinists will write it off without thought or consideration that they are wrong.BobRyan
October 6, 2022
October
10
Oct
6
06
2022
01:28 AM
1
01
28
AM
PDT
an unguided evolutionary explanation for what Behe calls irreducibly complex structures, including ATP synthase, will not be found.
let me add to the list: P H O T O S Y N T H E S I Smartin_r
October 5, 2022
October
10
Oct
5
05
2022
09:59 PM
9
09
59
PM
PDT
When we see any machinery in the world around us, we know immediately, without the slightest doubt, that the machine was designed and constructed with intelligence, forethought, and purpose. Our brains are constructed in such a way as to recognize such design intuitively without a second thought. The same is true when we observe biological machinery such as ATP synthase. We intuitively know it was designed and constructed with intelligence, forethought, and purpose. The molecules of the machine did not arrange themselves accidentally. To suggest such machinery could occur without great intelligence “Slowly, through some sort of intermediate or other” is willful refusal to admit what one intuitively already knows to be true. It is a choice one makes based not on science but on an irrational (unproven and unprovable) belief there is no God and therefore no intelligence in the universe greater than man's.Red Reader
October 5, 2022
October
10
Oct
5
05
2022
06:21 PM
6
06
21
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply